Does wind power cause visual pollution in your opinion?

I remember reading somewhere (probably my high school textbook) that one of the reasons people don’t like wind power being built is they cause visual pollution.

In my opinion, I think it would be pretty cool to just look out my window and see a giant windmill there, the opposite of visual pollution.

OscarRobin,

Well they look farrr better than coal mines and plants and smoke plumes. Even beyond that I think they just look plain nice though, like when I rarely get to see some it makes me happy.

Pietson,

Yes, but not much more than any other man-made construction. I can see windmills from my appartement and they have never even bothered me a little. However if my view was a beautiful tolkienesque landscape they probably would stand out like a sore thumb.

GissaMittJobb,

I think they look dope as hell.

orcrist,

Please define “visible pollution”. I think you mean something like “ugly”. So there’s not really much of a discussion to have, because it is opinion. Of course some people feel that way.

But anyway, since you asked, I’d rather look at wind turbines than the smog around, let’s say, Chicago or Los Angeles. But still that’s opinion.

zxqwas,

Yes. I would not want a row of them in my way looking out over the wilderness that I live next to.

Looking out over the town or farmland I don’t really care.

unrelatedkeg,

Just try to look at the sky at night. Most places in the world you won’t see the stars and yet no one complains too much about the visual pollution

Bytemeister,

Yes, in the form of dead birds and bats.

Personally, I think wind turbines look cool.

empireOfLove2, (edited )
@empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_pollution

the visible deterioration and negative aesthetic quality of the natural and human-made landscapes around people

All human activity creates “visual pollution” of all kinds. It is completely unavoidable. By the textbook definition, farmland, barns, barbed wire fences for livestock, all could qualify as visual pollution.

Wind turbines are no different. They could technically be defined as visual pollution, but they are quite benign in the grand scheme of things. They are typically designed with smooth edges and sweeping curves, and don’t give off a cluttered look, and as such do not really “interrupt” one’s environment. They do move, which can be a bit distracting, I guess.
They’re certainly much nicer to look at compared to the average nuclear/coal/nat.gas power plant

Rakonat,

I don’t mind them and lived in the midst of two wind “farms”. They aren’t usually clumped tightly together so you don’t see many until you’re out on the road.

Personally found them kind of calming to look at as part of the backdrop when it was nice outside and I could go out and listen to music or radio and just unplug. Personal opinions vary wildly and some people will hate them just for existing just as some people will find a mural or new building an eyesore, they don’t have a tangible reason and usually they just don’t want change, ontop of there being no shortage of easily disproveable conspiracy theories about turbines they cling to because someone said they were bad once and they can’t be bothered to fact check anything that doesn’t already support their opinion.

So ultimately I don’t mind them anymore than a water tower or grain bin/silo, they are just part of my skyline now and it didn’t take long to get used to them.

lemmie689, (edited )
@lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • asklemmy@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #