Showroom7561,

You want to attack the metaphysical for its belief system yet you completely miss when you make the same logical leaps for yours.

I want to challenge baseless claims. My sarcasm in response to baseless claims is intended to show how completely useless “logical leaps” actually are. I’m surprised you haven’t caught on.

How can insurance companies prove something?

Interviews, dash camera footage, police reports, etc. Evidence of what happened is gathered.

If a court makes a decision, is that the correct one?

If they are applying the law fairly and without prejudice, then it is often correct.

But in a court, you at least have the opportunity for both a plaintiff and defendant to present evidence of their position.

If you had someone in court say that “god told me to do it”, they had better have some strong evidence supporting that, no? In those cases, that person’s lawyer may try to argue that their client is insane, and rightfully so.

Only you can’t use logic or anything that comes from logical systems because, based on your attacks on religion, you’re not allowed to use the faith to prove the faith.

Faith = the belief in something without evidence. Faith itself is not evidence for anything.

If religion is going to use faith to “prove” all their claims, they will be challenged.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • asklemmy@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #