MooseBoys,

Just read both Al Jazeera and The Jerusalem Post and take the average.

magnetosphere,
@magnetosphere@kbin.social avatar

If you find a reliable source, let us know

SulaymanF,

Good question. It’s unfortunately difficult because it requires some knowledge of history and since there’s a cycle of back and forth violence (which most media only reports the latest episode and not what prompted it), it’s hard to follow the big picture.

baduhai,

Nowhere.

schnurrito,

Neutrality isn’t a thing. Everything written about something as contentious as this is propaganda.

For attempts to be neutral, try Western mainstream media or Wikipedia (which mostly just summarizes Western mainstream media anyway).

For one sided propaganda for Israel, try elderofziyon.blogspot.com

For one sided propaganda for Palestine, try mondoweiss.net

Read all those and choose for yourself what parts of which sides you want to believe. Or don’t. You can also live in peace and happiness knowing that the conflict exists without thinking about it too much because in the end it doesn’t really matter what you think about it anyway.

amio,

That's the neat part - you don't.

The idea that there could be a truly neutral source is not really realistic, human minds do not work that way and there are many other reasons why it's even harder than that.

As long as you stay away from the blatant extremes, partisans, people with some other stake in the game, etc., all you can do is evaluate relative bias, and try to adjust for it. It is inevitable that your take isn't going to be unbiased, either, but this way you'll have had a decent shot at minimizing wrongness.

nicman24,

noncredibledefense lol

twinnie,

I think BBC is pretty neutral, considering each side is accusing them of being biased towards the other.

1rre,

BBC historically have shown bias based on what they do and don’t report on, however what they do report on is generally a gold standard for neutrality

Jackthelad,

The BBC literally had to apologise a week ago for parroting Hamas propaganda about the missile hitting the hospital.

They then had the audacity to lecture people on how to avoid “misinformation”.

iforgotmyinstance,

So far nowhere. You have to read multiple takes and glean the truth within.

Candelestine,

Not a great idea to try. It’s theoretically possible but fraught with peril. Instead, it’s much more feasible to pick two news sources, one pro-whatever and one against, and check both.

There’s aggregators like (our sponsor,) ground news (!) that let you sort by stance and affiliation, that can make it more convenient.

If you must go with a shortcut, pick a country that is interested in the conflict, but not particularly on one side or the other, and read how its being reported there. India for instance, has been fairly neutral on this conflict, to the dismay of both sides, as they have economic ties to both Israel and the Arab world. They’re being critical of more or less everyone, and especially the British. lol Still not unbiased though, y’know?

So, it’s better to just check both sides regularly.

xkforce,

Reuters and AP are about the most neutral, reputable news sources youll find.

shinigamiookamiryuu,

There is no middle ground between their two conflicting narratives, so neutrality would be impossible unless you found a source that was criticizing every last individual who happened to be in the conflict. The closest you’d get is maybe a Bahai source, and I only say that as a tragically creative solution because Bahais don’t believe in discussing politics while being forced to talk about this because their leadership has been caught in the crossfire of the attacks, having shared a promised land with the Jews and being headquartered there.

donuts,
@donuts@kbin.social avatar

Probably nowhere, to be honest.

Today's Israeli-Palestinian conflict dates back thousands of years and combines politics, religion, race, war, and territory all in one.

If you really want to understand this from a non- biased point of view, your best bet is probably wikipedia, where different people with different viewpoints can debate the facts and non-biased writing is somewhat enforced.

The truth is that it's a very complex conflict with innocent people and some very shitty people, on both sides.

corship,

Just read the news from both sides and ask yourself what’s the most logical explanation when you combine those two sources.

It’s the closest you’ll get to an objective truth as there is one in a conflict older that any other conflict I am currently aware of.

SexyTimeSasquatch,

Just remember as you read news, these are inherently biased sources. Basically all of them are. Look at who they are citing to understand how bias might affect the information being relayed to you. For example, if Hamas or Gaza Authorities are saying something, it is probably coming from a pro Hamas perspective, if IDF or Israeli authorities are saying something, probably comes with some bias too. This is true of all news, all the time. The spin is real. Anyone claiming a lack of spin are probably the biggest spinners of bullshit. It sucks that to be well informed you have to be able to be literate not only in the language but also how to read journalism itself. But that’s the reality.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • asklemmy@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #