CaptainBasculin, (edited )

on a related note, help I’m too used to my i3wm config and now I cant switch to wayland at all, what do I do when xorg gets fully depreciated

NotSteve_,

I’ve heard sway is a drop in replacement of i3 for wayland. Only going off what I’ve heard though since I haven’t tried it myself

rescue_toaster,

Sway is basically the wayland version of i3. I’ve switched to wayland on my new laptop and learning sway after using i3 for years has been relatively easy.

z3rOR0ne, (edited )
@z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml avatar

Yeah, the config syntax is exactly the same. The major difference is the wayland version of various programs can be hard to figure out with out some decent google-fu.

I’m on BSPWM on X11, but have been trying river wm and that is a much less friendly conversion than i3 to sway. I’d convert entirely were it not for certain applications still not quite working on wayland without considerable configuration (wacom tablet drivers don’t work, screenshottung and eyedropper tools are available but still need more work to be feature comparable with equivalent tools on X11).

And I’m using proprietary NVIDIA drivers which are currently stuttering real bad on the wlroots protocol since driver update to 545 (sway/river both stutter bad whenever lots of movement on the screen, I’ve tried many tweaks to my environment variables to no avail).

So…just gonna wait for app, wayland, nvidia devs to eventually make the migrate worth while.

darganon,

Wayland being so Nvidia hostile while Nvidia is the only name for AI is kind of a kick in the balls

Shameless,

I’m still not fully across Linux because my job requires me to use Windows everyday. That said I’ve been using Pop_OS! On my personal machine for over two years now and its been flawless, requires little upkeep and minimal use of the terminal, the times I’ve needed to install stuff using the terminal has also been flawless which gives me extra confidence.

Whatever gives the least complicated experience and just works with little extra work is what will win out in the end for the day to day user. People generally just want to get on their machine, use the programs they want and not be interrupted by anything else from the computer, barring updates, we have all come to understand the importance of updates as routine maintenance.

ryannathans,

I RDP to a windows machine to work, from Pop_OS!. It’s nice because all the little stuff like web browsing can be done in my linux environment

pewgar_seemsimandroid,

ask your manager to allow you to use linux

Mango,

Well sure. My approach for looking for a distro was usually “which ones have KDE and pacman” and after that I start comparing.

Octopus1348,
@Octopus1348@lemy.lol avatar

And for me, AUR.

idefix,

Which distribs have pacman but not AUR?

Octopus1348,
@Octopus1348@lemy.lol avatar

I just wanted to mention that if a distro (somehow) had AUR but not pacman, I wouldn’t care.

send_me_your_ink, (edited )

Linux users fall into three categories. People who want stability over everything else, people who want everything to be bleeding edge, and people who don’t use desktop environments.

The most important thing for a new user is understand which of those three they are.

lamabop,

I just want to get away from the future hell that will be AI-controlled Win 12

send_me_your_ink,

I’ll be honest, unless you have been using Linux for…a long time, of your job requires you to manage servers, your probably not that last category.

If you enrolled in the windows insider/test doohickey then you might want look into the rolling release distros. If not, something with a standard release cadence will be better.

I my self? All of the servers I manage have no desktop environment (core infrastructure does not need graphics). But if I am on a workstation? LMDE - Because I care about the graphics getting out of my way so I can do my job.

jayemar,

I don’t disagree, but it’s so much easier to change environment: just logout and login with the new environment.

Trail,

Well if you really want it, you don’t even need to logout, but that is not the point…

SquishyPandaDev,
@SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net avatar

Too a certain point. I’ll give you that this applies to the Debian and Ubuntu distro. Gentoo, on the other hand, is a completely different animal and will have a far greater impact on user experience than the DE.

eldain,

You look at your DE all day and your distro holds everything together. Op didn’t say distro is unimportant and I agree it makes sense for new users to look at images and videos of different desktops first, maybe try a live cd, and then choosing the backend that suits their willingness to interact with.

If your electricity and time are cheap, you want to learn and your pc-system is your playground not a productivity tool, Gentoo is a valid option. In this case, your choice of DE impacts your compile time massively and knowing alternatives beforehand gives you options.

Ascend910, (edited )

I use i3wm btw

normalexit,

I feel like the window manager is important, but for newbies I also consider the package manager and overall installation process to be very important.

I’ve had pretty distros that are basically busted after a package fails to install or video drivers are mucked with. An advanced user could fix most of these issues, but this is usually where a new user may go running back to their previous OS.

A good computing experience for me is all my hardware working with minimal fuss and all the software I expect to be available being a few terminal commands away (e.g. steam, developer tools, etc.)

TwoBeeSan,

I use xfce btw

Vaniljkram,

And for new users choosing a distro with big user base (thus having a better support system) should be a top priority. Instead newbies are often advised to use an obscure distro that in theory might be a good fit, but isn’t. Probably those who do the recommendations are Linux testers (using VZ) rather than Linux users and mostly evaluate a distro based on install process and out of the box usage.

Configuring a big distro to your needs is much better than choosing a nishe distro.

yetAnotherUser,

I understand the argument being made, but I kind of disagree. Yes, picking a DE in which you’ll be comfortable is really important (and often an undervalued aspect of using Linux for the first time), but I think that the time you need to spend self-maintaining your distro is more important, and is also prone to make-or-break your first-time Linux experience. That’s the most important factor on whether a new user says “I love Linux and want to continue using it” or “I fricking hate Linux, it’s filled with a bunch of problems, I’d rather just use Windows instead”. And that’s why it’s important to recommend beginner-friendly distros, as to avoid frustration of newcomers, because those are more manageable (unless those newcomers want the frustration of managing something that they don’t quite understand :)

Does it matter which one in specific? No, and it’s probably at this point that the DE and visual looks should kick in.

SpaceCowboy,
@SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca avatar

I’ll go one further and say choosing applications is more important than choosing a Desktop Environment.

I’m typing this message on Firefox. I installed it (and updated it) with Debian’s package management system. I clicked on a button on an XFCE panel to open it. But in terms of the time spent interacting with things on my computer I’m using the applications far more than anything else.

m3t00,
@m3t00@lemmy.world avatar

nice to have choices. new users are better off with a polished install so they can get back to scrolling. takes work to do some desktops. ran a minimal thing for years at work. forget the name.

Acters,

While many can agree with a desktop environments importance, the desktop environment is rn closely tied to the distro’s philosophy. Many who venture outside the major distros will need to set up their own environment.

JayDee, (edited )

Just hopped back over to linux mint again after years of making due with Windows

  • Went with cinnamon cuz pretty.
  • switched to CobiWindowList so I could see all windows on either of my monitor menu bars.
  • switched to CinnVIIStarkMenu for a more familiar menu system.

Not much change, I can lean on the habits I’ve gotten from windows, and now my switch is pretty much unnoticeable to me.

Funny enough, Lutris has made it alot easier for me to access games I usually would just have downloaded, like my itch.io library. Proton has tackled all my other games fine. Hell, I even got Tarkov running smoothly, even though you can only do offline raids on Linux ATM.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linuxmemes@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #