TheDarkKnight, Should be the default option
Delta_V, I hope that includes what other sites would call “strictly necessary”. No thanks, if your site won’t work without, then I don’t need to visit.
AngryCommieKender, (edited ) What’s the issue with “strictly necessary” cookies? Seems like that would keep me from seeing about 70% of the pages I visit, if I were to completely refuse SN cookies. I just turn off all extemporaneous cookies. If they want to remember me for the few weeks between a cookie purge, go right ahead.
Bransons404, (edited ) uBlock origin on Firefox blocks almost all tracking sites. You can enable cookies or disable them, it doesn’t matter because they aren’t sent anywhere. Unless the site has some homebrew tracking solution.
knobbysideup, ITT a horde of people who don’t know that http is stateless. Cookies are the easiest and least intrusive way to maintain your session.
shasta, And those are allowed under GDPR as necessary cookies
FierySpectre, No prompt needed even
Bransons404, Also an easy way to store needed variables between pages. For news sites without a sign up this isn’t necessary but for actual web apps that live across different subdomains it can be a nice to have.
Cysioland, Haha Consent-o-Matic go brrr
Valmond, Ghostery plugin gang rise up!
WereCat, Vivaldi has setting to block these.
Lunachocken, Use the I don’t care about cookies extension its wonderful. Using it on my desktop and android Firefox.
kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E, Minimal Viable Product?
chemicalwonka, Because your decline doesn’t matter to them. They will track you even if you explicitly say NO.
Add comment