amzd, 1 year ago Your argument is called the nirvana fallacy; “World peace would be ideal; this peace treaty fails to completely achieve world peace; therefore this peace treaty is not worth doing.” And I do not accept that.
Your argument is called the nirvana fallacy;
“World peace would be ideal; this peace treaty fails to completely achieve world peace; therefore this peace treaty is not worth doing.”
And I do not accept that.