yote_zip,
@yote_zip@pawb.social avatar

One potential advantage is that many private trackers are meticulously-curated. The more people that are on a tracker, the harder it is to quality control every single upload. Most of the top-tier trackers aren’t just a dumping ground for data, they have tons of categories and slots for each potential piece of data to go, and if a better piece of data can fit in that slot then the previous one needs to be reviewed, deleted, and replaced.

Another reason is that private trackers often have many rules to facilitate the overall health of the tracker and its swarms, e.g. minimum quality for uploads, minimum seed times, required ratios etc. If anyone could get an account they could break the rules over and over after being banned.

Sharpiemarker,

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • vilibix535, (edited )

    Why and how does my account’s age matter? This is pretty much the equivalent of digging a person’s old tweets to find dirt about them.

    snooggums,
    @snooggums@kbin.social avatar

    Yes, it is like that if the lack of tweets indicated that you might be hiding something. It sucks if you never participated before, but the idea is that they want to interact with reliable accounts and time and activity are used for that since that us pretty much all they have to work with.

    It does suck, but there really isn't a good alternate.

    NeryK,
    @NeryK@sh.itjust.works avatar

    I would say it is more of a practical consideration. Private trackers generally enforce upload/download ratios. This ensures the health of the sharing pool stays good.

    alvvayson, (edited )

    Also, they curate the collection so that it doesn’t get filled with low quality garbage.

    Part of preserving and sharing knowledge is doing quality control.

    vilibix535,

    Do they ensure that each torrent is seeded? Do they have a problem of dead torrents?

    yote_zip,
    @yote_zip@pawb.social avatar

    Usually torrents remain seeded because private tracker users are encouraged to seed everything forever. In addition, often if a private tracker has a bonus system they will offer extra bonus points for seeding low-seed torrents, and some even automatically mark torrents as freeleech if they’re below ~5 seeds, encouraging people to revive its seed count in a targeted manner.

    Bear_with_a_hammer, (edited )

    Don’t know what are you talking about, I was seeding on Rutracker, NNMClub for 5 years, giving 10-15GB day sometimes, I’ve seen many profiles who share 6-10-15 TBs a day, just a couple days ago a guy was asking on qBittorrent discussion how he could improve his 18Tb home seedbox, he had to open different instances of qBittorrent Enhanced, because at 10-15k torrents it was bugging out.

    Their moderators contribute relentlessly, there are annual topics with competitions for best drawn picture, sang song, written poem, word games etc…

    There’s a thing called Torrentovka, when people from Rutracker meet and camp, telling stories, many couples were found and married this way, Rutracker is basically a family forum.

    Hell, my girlfriend uses NNMClub, we were both seeding Kaleo once at the same time :)

    Health comes with morality, it shouldn’t be mandatory.

    lukas, (edited )
    @lukas@lemmy.haigner.me avatar

    They’re talking about the good seeder to leecher ratio on private trackers, compared to the poor seeder to leecher ratio on public trackers. You and a couple of others might be good seeders on public trackers, but the majority aren’t. Private trackers try to filter out leechers.

    plague_sapiens, (edited )
    @plague_sapiens@lemmy.world avatar

    I think there’s lot less potential abuse, if you control your tracker and the peers. If I remember correctly, you usually have to seed till a specific ratio is reached. I doubt that any copyright-infringment-abuse-company tries to get acces to those trackers, if they have to upload stuff at first.

    lukas,
    @lukas@lemmy.haigner.me avatar

    Copyright alliances try to get access to private trackers, but only the database that tracks everything to arrest big uploaders. They don’t need anything else. Private trackers, as the name implies, track everything, a treasure trove of incriminating evidence.

    Krafting,
    @Krafting@lemmy.world avatar

    Often, ISP spy on public tracker to see if you download stuff but way less on privates one. I guess it’s just a way of staying more private.

    pedroparamo,

    I would also add that in public trackers you can download your file and close your torrent client and not share it back and therefore be selfish in just getting what you want tihiut sharing back to the pirate community

    weedwhacking,

    Leechy leaches

    Krafting,
    @Krafting@lemmy.world avatar

    I seed more on public than on provate tbh, why? Because there are way more leechers on public than on private or even semi private, the number of time I keep a torrent to seed and it stays at a ratio of 0 because it’s a dark things that probably get downloaded once a year… So I use some fake seed software because otherwise I’m not able to see it anyway… it’s sad and don’t make me happy, but sometime it’s the only way…

    plague_sapiens, (edited )
    @plague_sapiens@lemmy.world avatar

    That’s why I have abandoned private trackers. I only use public ones with a seed ratio of 2, because I like giving back. Everything else is downloaded with Real-Debrid and jDownloader2 (mostly OCHs or sometimes torrents, when there aren’t much/any seeders and the speed is unacceptably slow).

    SchizoDenji,

    Most trackers have minimum time after which you can stop seeding, and reseed request system where you are notified if anyone wants a dead torrent to be reseeded.

    lukas,
    @lukas@lemmy.haigner.me avatar

    ISPs only forward copyright notices they receive for your IP address. They don’t track public trackers.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #