privacy

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

mateomaui, in Cover Your Tracks: Test how well your browser protect you from tracking:

Using Firefox on iPhone

edit: Nvm previous result, I got the same result OP did with Firefox and Safari, I realized I was testing on my wifi with a pihole… switched to mobile network only and protection dropped to partial.

edit2: but Firefox Focus still has strong protection:

https://i.imgur.com/qeeuHKJ.jpg

auf, in Cover Your Tracks: Test how well your browser protect you from tracking:

Here’s my result (Tested on Safari on iPad)

https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/6bf2fe5c-8039-4a74-b9fb-e9888c488f84.jpeg

mateomaui,

While everyone’s at it, you may want to check for leaks with Mullvad VPN’s service, it picked up a DNS leak for me that got past a few other sites:

edit: also ipleak.net, which tests a few other things, like torrent ips

mp3, in BandCamp, SoundClound, what to use ?
@mp3@lemmy.ca avatar

If you own the music copyright, you could self-host it on Funkwhale if you want to go that way. It shouldn’t need a lot of resources too. It’s a federated platform, and relies on ActivityPub.

You want to share it with friends? Good. You want to share it with everyone? Up to you.

otter, in How Google, Facebook and others use our most personal secrets against us

Alternate link because this is worth sharing with others (who might not understand what this frontend is): www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyqNYGCmkQU

BroBot9000,
@BroBot9000@lemmy.world avatar

Video is set to private. Do you have another link?

mindbleach, in AI Generated CSAM Is Out of Control

There is no such thing.

God dammit, the entire point of calling it CSAM is to distinguish photographic evidence of child rape from made-up images that make people feel icky.

If you want them treated the same, legally - go nuts. Have that argument. But stop treating the two as the same thing, and fucking up clear discussion of the worst thing on the internet.

You can’t generate assault. It is impossible to abuse children who do not exist.

m0darn,

Did nobody in this comment section read the video at all?

The only case mentioned by this video is a case where highschool students distributed (counterfeit) sexually explicit images of their classmates which had been generated by an AI model.

I don’t know if it meets the definition of CSAM because the events depicted in the images are fictional, but the subjects are real.

These children do exist, some have doubtlessly been traumatized by this. This crime has victims.

daydrinkingchickadee, in AI Generated CSAM Is Out of Control

Didn’t watch the video, but I don’t care about AI CSAM. Even if it looks completely lifelike, it’s not real.

Neato,
@Neato@kbin.social avatar

Prove it's fake when some of it of your daughter is making it's way around school.

You've missed the point. Fake or not it does damage to people. And eventually it won't be possible to determine if it's real or not.

andrew_bidlaw, in AI Generated CSAM Is Out of Control
@andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works avatar

Creating, collecting and sharing CSAM is in the law already. There are orgs and agencies for tracking and prosecuting these violations.

It’s like fighting against 3d printers because you can make yourself a diy gun, a thing that have never being possible before because we got all pipes banned from hardware stores. The means to produce fictional CSAM always existed and would exist, the problem is with people who use a LMM, a camera, a fanfic to create and share that content. Or a Lemmy community that was a problem in recent months.

It’s better to ensure the existing means of fighting such content are effective and society is educated about this danger, know how to avoid and report it.

Vendetta9076, in AI Generated CSAM Is Out of Control
@Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works avatar

While lolicon is absolutely disgusting, its not actually csam. Legislation won’t work either and is honestly a waste of time. Any effort spent protecting digital children should instead be spent protecting real ones.

Outtatime, in Who's winning here, exactly?
@Outtatime@sh.itjust.works avatar

The future? Integrating AI in a way that spies on us even more than we’ve ever imagined.

Scary_le_Poo, in Who's winning here, exactly?
@Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org avatar

Windows 12 is not going subscription. This was a bad take by a worse source (who apologized).

Stop spreading this shit!

1984,
@1984@lemmy.today avatar

They want to and it’s coming in the future.

deegeese, in Chrome not proceeding with Web Integrity API deemed by many to be DRM

Today “only WebViews embedded in apps”

Tomorrow “YouTube requires an app”

Facebones, in Who's winning here, exactly?

I think decentralization is the key, but not necessarily these new fangled takes like the fediverse which have their own problems.

Just everyone build a damn site for yourself and if I want to know what Jeff Poff is up to I can go to jeffpoff.com and otherwise set up an rss feed for everyone I wanna keep up with. Community sites can cover needs for communities but otherwise why tf do I need Facebook for you to show me you went on vacation last month?

RovingFox, in Who's winning here, exactly?
@RovingFox@infosec.pub avatar

I am seeing it as a net positive. Especially because of the Windows 12 bit, the more Windows is an inconvenience, the more will jump ship, and some will land on linux.

poVoq, in Matrix vs. XMPP, Security, Privacy, Apps, Efficiency ?
@poVoq@slrpnk.net avatar

XMPP is much more popular for private messaging, so you don’t have many large public group chats like on Discord (and lesser extend Matrix). It can do it, but clients are not really optimized for that to be honest.

You can btw learn more on joinjabber.org

As for the specific questions on e2ee: OMEMO as it is currently implemented in most clients is very similar to Signal in security, but like Signal it does not encrypt metadata. There is an updated OMEMO standard that does encrypt metadata as well, but it hasn’t been adopted by any popular XMPP clients yet. However both versions are significantly more secure than Matrix’s MegOLM, which has chosen to sacrifice a lot of security for user convenience IMHO.

XMPP is actively developed, but it doesn’t have much funding for the open-source efforts, so it lacks PR and some things don’t develop as quickly as what you might be used from VC funded for-profit companies like Element/matrix.

I like the Movim webclient, but most current users seem to prefer the native clients for XMPP.

XMPP uses way less resources because it was designed to scale to billions of users for chat, instead of being some over-engineered failed experiment to use a DACS for chat, which really isn’t a good idea and never was.

Cwilliams, in Comparison of Android ROMs

I didn’t realize custom roms didn’t support android auto. The things you have to give up for privacy 😢

shym3q,
@shym3q@programming.dev avatar

Btw, modern cars are often nightmare for privacy. Mozilla has recently posted about it.

However, I saw on github that someone made android auto work with microg!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #