GlitzyArmrest,
@GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world avatar

The reason FOSS will always be better is because claims like that can actually be validated and audited. Any company can claim their stuff is E2E encrypted, but you’ll never know if that’s true for closed source software. Even if they do actually do E2E encryption, you’ll likely not know if they’re doing it properly and with strong encryption algorithms.

abuttifulpigeon,

I wasn’t asking if FOSS can be trusted, I was asking if Zello can be trusted. The general consensus judging by the comments so far is an astounding no, by nobody has really provided any good alternatives with similar functionality.

GlitzyArmrest,
@GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world avatar

I wasn’t talking about whether or not to trust FOSS, I was talking about Zello (since it’s closed source, which I originally mentioned). There might not be a FOSS alternative, I don’t know since I have never needed a walkie talkie app. That’s why I didn’t mention one and only answered the first part of your question. You’re right that it probably can’t be fully trusted (because it’s closed source).

abuttifulpigeon,

Oh, apologies for the misunderstanding.

ultratiem,
@ultratiem@lemmy.ca avatar

Their claims cannot be verified. So no, you can’t “trust” them on anything more than their claims. Which can’t be validated. So…

NabeGewell,
@NabeGewell@lemmy.world avatar

Yeah well I claim I’m Gabe Newell’s brother.

velox_vulnus,

When will Half-Life 4 be out?

NabeGewell,
@NabeGewell@lemmy.world avatar

april 12

kixik,

Why not looking for distributed mechanism, which don’t depend on trusting central servers or particular instances on decentralized mechanisms, like jami, or similar?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #