wincing_nucleus073,

i assume that the official telegram client uses FCM. but the Telegram FOSS client on Fdroid and its forks use a background service.

potemkinhr,
@potemkinhr@lemmy.ml avatar

I’ve noticed notifications are working sporadically now for quite some time (at least half a year now) for both Android (both Play store version and APK) and iOS from my experience. Only on the deskptop version of it are notifications instant, hope they will fix it at some point

LWD, (edited )

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • rdri, (edited )

    I’ve been using Telegram enough to understand that such allegations are useless. The first link is literally not about Telegram but about its 3rd party fork that original developers can’t do anything about. The second link is about piracy, and any app owner would handle any data they could in similar situations.

    Telegram is not just a messaging app but a public platform with channels and public chats. Any app with these properties will eventually have the same issues. If you don’t want to risk, you just use it as a personal messaging app and that’s it - in this way it’s not much different from other “secure” messaging apps.

    The way for apps like Signal to remain “truly secure” in “careful” users’ eyes is avoiding the introduction of the public communication part, which could lead to all the same problems some people don’t like Telegram for.

    That said, Telegram actually has a history of being a “bad actor” if you want to call it so. Namely:

    • At first it was possible to steal someone’s account by faking a SIM card (any government can do this). Later Telegram introduced cloud password that helped to prevent such cases.
    • At various points Telegram wrongfully banned and marked as “fake” various channels and bots used by opposition in Russia.

    But I can’t agree that either of that makes Telegram an insecure messaging platform. It’s either about bad management decisions in specific situations (e.g. Durov being worried about Telegram getting banned) or technical aspects of how user reports are handled (basically any channel can get marked “fake” if enough user reports are received).

    wincing_nucleus073, (edited )

    yeah funny how the oh-so-private and amazing signal allows bad actors to take over your account with sim access, and telegram does not.

    toastal,

    Criticism of Telegram isn’t endorsement for Signal. They are both garbage in different ways.

    FarLine99,
    @FarLine99@lemmy.world avatar

    I know and use Signal to communicate with family/friend. but everyone at work uses telegram, I can’t give them all an ultimatum to switch to Signal

    Gooey0210,

    If you’re ready to put on tinfoil, signal is not the way to go too

    Phone number requirement is a big no-no in privacy community, plus signal wants to centralize more and more, when they could actually make it possible to selfhost signal

    FarLine99,
    @FarLine99@lemmy.world avatar

    I don’t agree with you. so far Signal is the most mature and feature-rich messenger of the rest. yes, it provides privacy, not anonymity. but all new people are used to the algorithm of adding people, unlike SimpleX, Matrix, etc.

    miss_brainfart,
    @miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml avatar

    Phone numbers harm anonymity, not privacy.

    Kissaki,
    @Kissaki@feddit.de avatar

    Your first link:

    42 million user IDs and phone numbers for a third-party version of Telegram were exposed online without a password. The accounts belong to users in Iran, where the official Telegram app is blocked.

    How is that a state exploit of Telegram? It’s not even about Telegram. It’s a third party app.

    AnEilifintChorcra,

    Telegram uses Google services like Signal for notifications - telegra.ph/Notifications-FIX its the first point under the Android section

    core.telegram.org/api/push-updates these are the docs for building your own Telegram app, specifically the push notifications section and again it mentions using APNS for iOS or FCM for Android but they also offer Simple push which would work with Unifiedpush and would be one way to bypass FCM but I don’t know if they offer that in their official app or if there are any other Telegram apps that have implemented it

    FarLine99, (edited )
    @FarLine99@lemmy.world avatar

    “Signal only uses FCM to wake up the Android app if there are new messages waiting on the Signal server and the app isn’t connected to it. Signal does not include any information in these notifications, encrypted or otherwise, so Google can only infer that your device has something queued on Signal’s servers.” I was wondering if a similar system has been implemented in telegram?

    Gooey0210,

    It’s still metadata, ditch google play services all at once

    FarLine99,
    @FarLine99@lemmy.world avatar

    Too radical a solution for me, I used microG for a long time, but the notification problems made me go back to Google services. i’ve banned them from accessing camera/microphone/geolocation via App Ops (put them on ignore mode), so I’m pretty calm. but notifications are still a problem).

    Gooey0210,

    They are priv apps, I believe it’s the same as root

    Most of the privacy apps don’t require you to have gapps and their notifications

    poVoq,
    @poVoq@slrpnk.net avatar

    The Telegram client available on F-droid does not use FCM for push notifications.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #