MaximilianKohler, 1 year ago It isn’t, and a random website isn’t a source So you clearly don’t understand how citations work. You shouldn’t even be engaging in discussions like this until you do. If you have an article from a medical journal, or a study with a sample size of over 1,000 diverse participants I’ll happily read that. Once again proving that you didn’t read anything you’re arguing about. You need to reassess your behavior. Antibiotics save lives. Vaccines save lives. They are good things. False dichotomy, further demonstrating your cluelessness.
It isn’t, and a random website isn’t a source
So you clearly don’t understand how citations work. You shouldn’t even be engaging in discussions like this until you do.
If you have an article from a medical journal, or a study with a sample size of over 1,000 diverse participants I’ll happily read that.
Once again proving that you didn’t read anything you’re arguing about. You need to reassess your behavior.
Antibiotics save lives. Vaccines save lives. They are good things.
False dichotomy, further demonstrating your cluelessness.