30p87

@30p87@feddit.de

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

30p87, (edited )

ich = me
iel = im echten leben = in real life

so ich_iel = me_irl

30p87,

Well to be fair, you did. And he’s the perfect answer to your question, as an example to why some people are racist: They’re simply dumb.

30p87,

And if you do ask someone, your grammar is on point.

30p87,

Ofc, you would not want your own computer to have a virus, would you?

Joke, I’m jealous of you and your Government. Germany is doing something, but not nearly enough to push Linux.

30p87, (edited )

This is literally comedy lmao.

Most points are just complaining that tools specifically designed for X don’t work on Wayland. That’s like hanging onto your childhood pants and complaining they don’t fit anymore.

30p87,

And I had exactly zero crashes of Wayland in my life, on any device.

30p87,

Does your Windows do this? doesn’t crash

But seriously, yesterday I cloned my main partition to a new laptop into an LVM volume on LUKS. Because I did not have any way of putting the new NVMe and old SATA SSD into one machine, I just used netcat over an ad hoc network.


<span style="color:#323232;">nc -l 10000 > /dev/main/root
</span>

on the new Laptop and


<span style="color:#323232;">cat /dev/sda3 | nc 10.31.69.1 10000 -q 0
</span>

on the old one. Worked perfectly. Now do that on Windows with builtin tools in live boots.

30p87,

The rate was around 100MB/s. So I think the bottleneck was probably the read/write speeds of the SSDs, considering I have ~900Mbit/s down from speedtest.net, and this setup removed every hop except the old and new Laptops Gigabit Lan Port and the Gigabit patch cable between them. But with larger files/partitions over the internet this would probably help

30p87,

The only problems with my Arch install were

  • /etc/fstab, which I forgot about because I didn’t read the whole install article again
  • custom configs (notable conky) because i8k is not available and all interfaces changed
30p87,

At least e621 isn’t an obvious name

30p87, (edited )

I’m much happier to install one of the dozens of adblock addons, than to disable the built in one and still install an addon. Cuz that would mean bloat. I want to have the options to choose the adblock I have installed, and not only which one I use.
Builtin adblockers of other browsers, especially more commercial ones, have proven to be buyable by ad companies. They also fail, and have failed, on YouTube, where some addons still succeed.
One could argue Mozilla could encourage the users to actively choose an adblocker, but that would mean annoying popups and basically ads for adblockers.

Default FF with a few settings and addons is fine.

deleted_by_moderator

  • Loading...
  • 30p87,

    They’re probably not buying but making fun of it. Which is the best approach, probably.

    30p87,

    Note that it is not blind. It can still see you.

    30p87,

    To be fair, someone not using GNU would not be as unlikely here.

    30p87,

    They aren’t as addicting but still crunch, that’s why.

    30p87,

    I see, you did not have mirrors or water in your childhood then? /s

    30p87,

    *Microsoft devs

    Now, seriously. Microsoft’s devs literally only do something if their boss tells them to, and the boss only cares about money. The support teams only know chkdsk and reboot.

    30p87, (edited )

    Especially in the US. First of all because they exist there, I haven’t seen one in Germany, and second because guns.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #