@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

Slowy

@Slowy@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Slowy, (edited )
@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

Why are you so focused on men vs. women? That kind of subtle (and often not so subtle) sexism that you frequently post isn’t really appreciated, or funny, it’s just shitty and boring. Just treat us like people…

Slowy,
@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

So did you you guys at least dip a cold chocolate bar in it? Was it good lol?

Slowy,
@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

pink sand beach with evergreen trees

Would the pink sand from eroding Canadian Shield type rocks be worth looking at? I think there are garnet and quartz around

Slowy, (edited )
@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

Ok I took some mediocre photos of the sand with this cheap digital microscope, it looks very nice. Can you tell anything about it?

magnifyed pink sand on a glass slidemagnifyed pink sand on a glass slide

Slowy, (edited )
@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

A good pair of tongs is gamechanger. But in a perfect world I would be able to use a dino head grabber

Slowy, (edited )
@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

I would think the cases of non-human animals committing suicide (mostly cetaceans) would be indicative that at least some of them can comprehend personal mortality on some level. It’s a bit different if an animal doesn’t eat due to stress or whatever and starves to death, I wouldn’t call that suicide. But whales occasionally just drown themselves, that’s pretty hard to rationalize any other way

Slowy,
@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/…/viewcontent.…

Nothing concrete of course, because it’s very difficult to study at a stage where we cannot communicate or directly observe the emotional states of animals, nor ethically design a study where one attempts to cause animals enough distress to engage in self harm or bring about their deaths (and simultaneously prove that was their intent).

It’s in no way a concluded topic, but it doesn’t make sense to reject outright either - and I definitely think there is enough evidence around for animals understanding of their peers mortality, why start with the assumption that they have an inability to recognize their own mortality in the first place? It’s good to be skeptical, but unproven anthropomorphism is just as illogical as the opposite assumption.

Slowy,
@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

The whole plant is edible it’s just not all palatable all the time

Slowy,
@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

What’s up with the scarring(?) on their chests?

Slowy,
@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

Thanks for the details, I assumed something cultural because of the consistent horizontal orientation - it would have to be an extremely specific whipping technique to create those. It’s a shame colonizers and slavers used that practice as reason to hurt them even more, though…

Slowy,
@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

What if a computer reviews the data and prints a readout? Is the program a consciousness for this purpose?

Slowy,
@Slowy@lemmy.world avatar

I don’t know which aspect is stronger for certain but emotions are a very base thing. Humans can definitely intellectualize our emotions way more and create a lot of emotional nuance that way. But it seems reasonable that pure emotional intensity, and probably sometimes emotional perception (with less nuance) as well, could be stronger in some other highly social animals.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #