TheSanSabaSongbird

@TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

They take draconian measures because they’re held hostage by one of the world’s most powerful and effective crime families. One only needs to look at South Korea to see that it doesn’t have to be this way.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

It’s a problem because people don’t feel like stakeholders when they don’t have a say and can’t participate in their system of governance. This in turn means that they aren’t incentivized to willingly participate and have to be forced or indoctrinated, both of which are violations of human rights.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

It’s the final refuge for tankies. That and the old “social democracy only works by exploiting the global south” canard.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

There is a reason, it’s just not the one you think. Hint; it’s about empire, not communism.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

You still have the problem of misaligned incentives together with the fact that the only way to mitigate it is through coercion. This is why all communism inevitably leads to authoritarianism. The strength of capitalism is that it can absorb and indeed is designed to allow for the fact that humanity’s cooperative impulse --due to the fact that we evolved over hundreds of thousands of years to live in small bands of about 30 to 150 people-- cannot work at the level of the modern nation state.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

No one chooses to be a drug addict or an alcoholic, you cretin.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

My wife’s old iMac over here. It’s lightning fast too.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

Meanwhile, the problem with communism is that it relies on everyone having aligned incentives on a nation-state level, which is a pleasant fiction and can only be achieved through authoritarian coercion.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

Save yourself the trouble; free will as we normally conceive of it is entirely an illusion.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

There’s a blast from the past. I used Telnet as an undergrad back in the 90s.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

I’m in my 50s, but in my head I’m still 36.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

I miss the niche content. Lemmy isn’t big enough yet to have sorted into big “stupid” subs vs smaller niche subs that tend to attract smarter and more well-informed users. The result is that the signal-to-noise ratio on Lemmy still kind of sucks and any comment thread is likely to consist of three quarters banal gibberish and condescending idiocy and maybe one quarter actually intelligent, thoughtful and informed opinion.

I rarely make a comment on Lemmy without pissing off people on all sides of any given issue, which tells me that Lemmy’s users aren’t really good at nuance or complexity.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

Wait till you get a load of the accommodations in much of the developing world. I’ve had some real adventures during my travels over the years.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

I just leave the door open, that way everyone knows I’m in there. I even wave at the kids.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

I think it’s fair to criticize Israeli tactics and overall strategy, but most of the blanket condemnation you see on Lemmy is indicative of pure moral confusion and/or an unfamiliarity with historical and contemporary facts. That the outrage is so selective --it’s never applied to other similar and even unprovoked civilian massacres-- tells us everything we need to know about how well-thought-out it is.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

Nice! I’m a Telecaster man as well! Me and Jesus.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

In OP’s defense, is it possible that they were referencing the Xi as Winnie the Pooh meme? Pooh is in fact yellow and is ostensibly an animal.

I dunno, I wasn’t there for the larger context, but it seems at least possible that this is what happened.

I will take my downvotes now.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

Good plate armor was nowhere near as ungainly as many people imagine. A knight wearing a well-made suit would actually retain a surprising amount of agility and speed. The downside was that they obviously had to be custom made and were so expensive that only the wealthiest nobles could afford them.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

It’s also because Hamas has its origins in the Muslim Brotherhood which for obvious reasons means that Egypt is very leery of accepting Palestinians from Gaza.

I’m not defending their position, just explaining it; Egypt is basically a military dictatorship at this point and the Muslim Brotherhood is enemy number one for them.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

They did a little more than simply “fight back.” They also engaged in widespread and utterly gratuitous acts of violence and torture in ways that can only have been calculated to trigger an overreaction on the part of Israel. They knew exactly what they were doing and what would happen. They obviously don’t give a fuck about their own people.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

Also, even though it was set in Korea, it was really about Vietnam, which seems obvious now, but never occurred to me watching it as a kid.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

Terrorism is a tactic, so no, not all “freedom fighters” are terrorists. There are and have been throughout history many guerrilla groups that don’t use terrorism tactics but that could still be called “freedom fighters.”

TheSanSabaSongbird,

The selective outrage is also very telling. Palestinian civilians killed by indiscriminate bombing? Apoplectic red-faced spittle-flying fury!

Ukrainian civilians or even Syrian civilians killed by the same? Relative silence even though in both cases it was even less provoked. What’s really going on here? And I don’t mean that as a rhetorical question either; I honestly don’t know. I have a theory, but I’m not entirely confident in it just yet.

TheSanSabaSongbird,

Small scale hunting and gathering societies are universally egalitarian because it’s impossible for any one person to accumulate significant wealth or to control resources. The way members of such societies gain influence therefore is through virtue and personal merit. This is the social system that we evolved to live in over hundreds of thousands of years, and it’s why we still haven’t figured out an equally amenable replacement in the mere ten thousand years since we adopted agriculture.

That said, for better or worse, agriculture is a trap, and once we adopted it, there was never any going back, so we have no choice but to keep trying with what we have.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #