Looking at the two big news publishers in my country. One isnāt reporting about the current bombings at all, while the other one is phrasing their words mostly anti-Palestinian....
Iām aware of that, and some of the current claims are probably subject to change in the future. I just browsed through reuters, and they seem unbiased. While my local news refers to hamas as āradical islamic terror organisation Hamasā, reuters just uses āhamasā.
While this might be true, itās all about the context. They make it seem like the Israelis are targeting the ābad guysā and should be allowed to do so. But they donāt mention the unrightful suffering and death of Palestinian civilians at all.
You now what I mean? If they call the Hamas a radical islamic terror organization (which Iām fine with), why donāt they also call the Israelis a radical zionist terror organization?
What I want to read is, if the Hamas fucked up, then let me know about it, also, if the Israelis fucked up, I want to know about that too.
But havenāt they oppressed the Palestinians for the past decades. Didnāt they evidently commit crimes that fall under the umbrella of āterrorā?
At some point, itās unavoidable for organisations to arise, that donāt play by the rules anymore.
Where can I NEUTRALLY keep up to date about the Palestina/Israel situation?
Looking at the two big news publishers in my country. One isnāt reporting about the current bombings at all, while the other one is phrasing their words mostly anti-Palestinian....