Comments

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

atzanteol, (edited ) to linux in New Linux user here. Is this really how I'm supposed to install apps on Linux?

the “year of the Linux computer” will never happen.

It won’t, that’s fine. People who don’t want to lean anything about computers use iOS and Android now. And that’s fine. I never want Linux distros to become like that.

atzanteol, to linux in KDE's Nate Graham On X11 Being A Bad Platform & The Wayland Future

Lol. Learn your history.

Don’t be shitty.

atzanteol, to linux in KDE's Nate Graham On X11 Being A Bad Platform & The Wayland Future

Neat.

atzanteol, to linux in KDE's Nate Graham On X11 Being A Bad Platform & The Wayland Future

I don’t see a problem.

I didn’t say there was a problem. I’m saying it’s pretty disingenuous to act like Wayland isn’t intended as a replacement for X11. All of which you seem to agree with. As you say “nobody forces Wayland onto anyone yet” (emphasis mine).

Also - I just love how your comment is written like a politician would have written it. “Sure you can use the dirty old X11 if you really want to, or you can use the nice new God-fearing Wayland”.

atzanteol, to linux in What is the point of dbus?

Wouldn’t this also be possible with plain sockets tho?

You keep using this phrase. Given time and money anything is possible. Technically we don’t need to use http - every server could implement their own standard using raw sockets. You then could download a simple client library for every site!

With a well defined dbus interface your application can talk to any number of applications that implement that interface. Even those you didn’t know about it at time of development. It provides a structure for ipc other than “go fetch libblah” and also “libblarg” and “libfloob” and read all of their docs and implement each one separately.

atzanteol, to linux in KDE's Nate Graham On X11 Being A Bad Platform & The Wayland Future

Yes. And it’s a bad analogy. Nobody is expecting you to be able to take a barge on railways. But existing linux applications are being expected to run on Wayland. As I said - railways didn’t replace canals - they’re different types of things.

atzanteol, to linux in KDE's Nate Graham On X11 Being A Bad Platform & The Wayland Future

Railways are not a “replacement” for canals.

atzanteol, to linux in KDE's Nate Graham On X11 Being A Bad Platform & The Wayland Future

It’s not intended as a drop in replacement.

… Which is why it “breaks everything”

atzanteol, to linux in Which distro in your opinion is the best for virtualization (Windows 10 on either KVM or VMware), stability, and speed?

Frequent updates? Are you on an lts version?

atzanteol, to linux in KDE's Nate Graham On X11 Being A Bad Platform & The Wayland Future

Nate Graham acknowledges current gaps in Wayland support but on the matter of “Wayland breaks everything” isn’t really the right perspective

That’s rather disingenuous. It’s meant to be a replacement for X11. So it does break things.

atzanteol, to selfhosted in Could someone explain how to set up a lemmy instance with ansible for an absolute beginner

I agree completely with self hosting lemmy for a beginner. But disagree completely about ansible.

Learning to script your environment is extremely useful for stability, maintainability, and security.

atzanteol, to linux in Looking for input regarding finding an IDE (spoilers: involves Emacs and Vim)

This is true. The ctrl+a, ctrl+e and ctrl+l stuff is very emacs-like.

You can actually set bash to use a vi mode as well (set -o vi). Though I’ve found it to be annoying for use on the CLI for some reason.

atzanteol, to linux in Looking for input regarding finding an IDE (spoilers: involves Emacs and Vim)

Modal editors were neat when required, but then we got full keyboards and control keys.

Have you ever seen old Unix keyboards?

atzanteol, to linux in Looking for input regarding finding an IDE (spoilers: involves Emacs and Vim)

My comment on Emacs is a bit flip - but it’s based on what I’ve seen and from my biased vi-using POV. Almost every IDE or developer-focused app I use has some sort of Vi keybinding either available as a plugin or built-in. And they’re often pretty good. Even joplin which is a note-taking app has Vi keybindings built in (though to be fair it also supports emacs keybinds).

If anything Vi keybindings have become more popular over time not less. “back in the day” getting any sort of Vi keybindings working with IDEs was either impossible or painful and limited. These days it’s a checkbox. The nice thing is I can take a good sub-set of the Vi bindings between many editors and IDEs. Ideavim’s implementation is quite good and even supports vim macros which are amazing once you get the hang of them.

atzanteol, to linux in Looking for input regarding finding an IDE (spoilers: involves Emacs and Vim)

As a long-time Vi user I would highly recommend giving it a shot for a solid month to see if it clicks for you. It’s genuinely an excellent way to edit text beyond “just typing words” - it’s a huge productivity boost once you’re competent with even some of the basic commands. There are just soo many combineable short-cuts at your fingertips that once you get a few of them under your belt you’ll go nuts without them. And the simple macros you can write can allow you to do mass manipulation of multiple lines in ways that are just so simple (e.g. “add quotes around every line and a comma at the end”).

Dive in beyond the basic “hjkl:q” though.

Which version of vi you use won’t largely matter. As a bonus most IDEs support a good subset of vi commands so your skills become transferable. I use PyCharm and other Jet Brains IDEs all the time and ideavim is “good enough” for what I do.

Emacs is dead near as I can tell.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #