Comments

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

bogdugg, to piracy in OpenSubtitles.org is shutting down it's previous API. Now only authenticated access allowed.
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

If you’re looking for an alternative, I’ve had luck with subscene.com

I don’t really know what the best or most popular website is because this one has never really led me astray. That said, I don’t need to use them too often, so your mileage may vary.

bogdugg, to asklemmy in What's the best response to someone who believes in hard determinism but also uses this to deny responsibility for any immoral actions they commit?
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

I’m a fairly hardcore/radical determinist, and tend to agree that individuals shouldn’t be held morally responsible for actions, any more than a hammer is morally responsible for driving a nail. However, that does not mean people should be free from consequence. There are plenty of reasons - even as a hardcore determinist - to hold people to account for their actions, either as a social corrective mechanism, public safety, deterrent, or personal sanity.

As for getting their actions to align with your morals, that’s a more complicated question that depends on the type of person they are.

bogdugg, to asklemmy in What is your unpopular flim opinion
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

Gonna try to phrase this an inflammatory way:

People who like bad movies have been conditioned by consumerism to not appreciate art. They believe spectacle, humour, and a tight plot are ‘good enough’, and they don’t value thoughtfulness, novelty, beauty, or abrasiveness nearly enough. Film is more than a way to fill time and have fun. Film is more than an explosion, a laugh, and a happy ending.

On an unrelated note: Mad Max: Fury Road is one of my favourite movies.

bogdugg, to asklemmy in Current and Former (Fast) Food Service Workers - How do you handle requests like “All the fries you can give me”?
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

Nobody wants a burger that’s one 1/8th pound patty and 3 inches worth of solid lettuce.

Had regulars when I worked fast food that would order the kid size burger with a fuckton of lettuce and tomato. Just way too much.

bogdugg, to asklemmy in What is the point of small instances?
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

I think you’ve correctly identified a problem, but misidentified the solution.

It’s true that there are many redundant communities of which everyone would be better served if there were an easy way to group them together. The solution, however, is not to reduce the number of instances, but rather to provide more tools for instances to group communities together. You want communities to be spread across many instances because this maximizes user control - it’s kind of the entire point? But of course, the lack of grouping makes it very difficult to try to centralize discussion, which is important for the community to grow. This service is still a work in progress, so these kinds of things - I hope - will come in time, as both the technology and culture develops.

tl;dr: centralized control bad, centralized discussion good, the current system does a bad job of reconciling these two positions

bogdugg, to asklemmy in What reasons are there for being concerned about companies like google and meta etc collecting data and tracking me?
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

Things we need are higher on our priorities than things we want, and addiction convinces you that you need that thing. So anything that can monetize that addiction is going to be more effective and consistent than something you merely want.

bogdugg, to asklemmy in What reasons are there for being concerned about companies like google and meta etc collecting data and tracking me?
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

Here’s one example of how your data can be wielded against you: businessinsider.com/police-getting-help-social-me…

bogdugg, to asklemmy in What is your unpopular flim opinion
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

I added that to sort of admit my own hypocrisy; I tried to exaggerate my opinion a bit for the sake of spurring discussion. I mostly believe what I said, but my real thoughts are much messier and less well thought out.

bogdugg, to asklemmy in What is your unpopular flim opinion
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

Many Marvel films, for example, are actually competently written plot wise. I also believe lots of them have basically no value.

bogdugg, to piracy in OpenSubtitles.org is shutting down it's previous API. Now only authenticated access allowed.
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar
bogdugg, to asklemmy in What's the best response to someone who believes in hard determinism but also uses this to deny responsibility for any immoral actions they commit?
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

What drives the thing that drives the hammer? What drives the thing that drives the thing that drives the hammer? What drives the thing that drives the thing that drives the thing that drives the hammer?

Physical processes out of our control.

bogdugg, to asklemmy in What's the best response to someone who believes in hard determinism but also uses this to deny responsibility for any immoral actions they commit?
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

Doesn’t that imply that people have the ability to change their behavior?

My answer changes depending on your meaning but:

Of course. My brain is constantly updating and improving itself. I’m just not ultimately in control of how that process happens. Though that does not mean that I should stop living. I can still experience and enjoy my life, and ‘choose’ to improve it. It’s just that the I that made that choice is a consequence of my brain calculating optimal paths based on a myriad of factors: genetics, culture, circumstance, biological drives, personal history, drugs, etc.

bogdugg, to asklemmy in What's the best response to someone who believes in hard determinism but also uses this to deny responsibility for any immoral actions they commit?
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

By determined, I mean it follows a logical set of rules, not that it is set on a specific action. The idea would be that it was determined to make all those choices because everything else is also following the rules of the universe. Just as it was determined that they play in traffic, so was it determined for me to tell them to stop, just as it was determined for them to listen. They didn’t choose to change their mind, they were always going to change their mind.

bogdugg, to asklemmy in What's the best response to someone who believes in hard determinism but also uses this to deny responsibility for any immoral actions they commit?
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

We are constantly making and updating our choices in response to new information. Just because the brain decided upon one course of action at one point in time does not preclude it from changing course in the future. That’s just a new choice. All available information is taken into consideration at all points in time.

bogdugg, to asklemmy in What's the best response to someone who believes in hard determinism but also uses this to deny responsibility for any immoral actions they commit?
@bogdugg@sh.itjust.works avatar

I believe consciousness is a result of processes of the brain, and the brain is a very complex machine. It’s hard to say anything too concretely beyond that because I don’t really understand how it works. I live as though the brain and my consciousness are in perfect sync, but I’m unsure how true that is.

There are, for example, experiments where it can be shown that decisions are made before we are consciously aware that we have made them. Others show that severing a nerve between the hemispheres of our brain can result in two independent consciousnesses. Who can say where I end and my brain begins?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #