brbposting

@brbposting@sh.itjust.works

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

What is Something Scientific that you just don't believe in at all?

EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something...

brbposting,

I think that’s an oversimplification. I get different results.

Wiki claims (with five sources I didn’t check):

DuckDuckGo’s results are a compilation of “over 400” sources according to itself, including Bing, Yahoo! Search BOSS, Wolfram Alpha, Yandex, and its own web crawler (the DuckDuckBot); but none from Google.

brbposting,

Was Yandex respecting your query there?

Added quotation marks for “terabox” as well, and it was fascinating across providers:

Yandex agreed with your Google search…

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/96a9e479-baf2-4627-b6fa-0b59b3d2167a.jpeg

…but not mine:

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/37340e40-85ab-4118-8cf7-792de3483a63.jpeg

DDG coming in with one result:

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/192e6a4a-ff3c-49fc-a978-5e66f9846f54.jpeg

Startpage, just one result?!

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/c2edbf55-e5af-421f-a79d-315d70f181b7.jpeg

…nope, not from the “mobile site”:

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/826eb071-b503-4ce8-9deb-19365c784583.jpeg

Bing didn’t care about those silly quotation marks, here are a thousand results:

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/c5401f64-a511-4be4-ae4a-d03eee1b4cef.jpeg

Good luck web devs (lemmy.world)

Alt text:Twitter post by Daniel Feldman (@d_feldman): Linux is the only major operating system to support diagonal mode (credit [Twitter] @xssfox). Image shows an untrawide monitor rotated about 45 degrees, with a horizontal IDE window taking up a bottom triangle. A web browser and settings menu above it are organized creating a...

brbposting,

No, Richard, it’s ‘Linux’, not ‘GNU/Linux’. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation.

Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ.

One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS – more on this later). He named it ‘Linux’ with a little help from his friends. Why doesn’t he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff – including the software I wrote using GCC – and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don’t want to be known as a nag, do you?

(An operating system) != (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies whereever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title ‘GNU/Linux’ (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example.

Next, even if we limit the GNU/Linux title to the GNU-based Linux distributions, we run into another obvious problem. XFree86 may well be more important to a particular Linux installation than the sum of all the GNU contributions. More properly, shouldn’t the distribution be called XFree86/Linux? Or, at a minimum, XFree86/GNU/Linux? Of course, it would be rather arbitrary to draw the line there when many other fine contributions go unlisted. Yes, I know you’ve heard this one before. Get used to it. You’ll keep hearing it until you can cleanly counter it.

You seem to like the lines-of-code metric. There are many lines of GNU code in a typical Linux distribution. You seem to suggest that (more LOC) == (more important). However, I submit to you that raw LOC numbers do not directly correlate with importance. I would suggest that clock cycles spent on code is a better metric. For example, if my system spends 90% of its time executing XFree86 code, XFree86 is probably the single most important collection of code on my system. Even if I loaded ten times as many lines of useless bloatware on my system and I never excuted that bloatware, it certainly isn’t more important code than XFree86. Obviously, this metric isn’t perfect either, but LOC really, really sucks. Please refrain from using it ever again in supporting any argument.

Last, I’d like to point out that we Linux and GNU users shouldn’t be fighting among ourselves over naming other people’s software. But what the heck, I’m in a bad mood now. I think I’m feeling sufficiently obnoxious to make the point that GCC is so very famous and, yes, so very useful only because Linux was developed. In a show of proper respect and gratitude, shouldn’t you and everyone refer to GCC as ‘the Linux compiler’? Or at least, ‘Linux GCC’? Seriously, where would your masterpiece be without Linux? Languishing with the HURD?

If there is a moral buried in this rant, maybe it is this:
Be grateful for your abilities and your incredible success and your considerable fame. Continue to use that success and fame for good, not evil. Also, be especially grateful for Linux’ huge contribution to that success. You, RMS, the Free Software Foundation, and GNU software have reached their current high profiles largely on the back of Linux. You have changed the world. Now, go forth and don’t be a nag.

Thanks for listening.

brbposting,

Why listen and risk even a slap on the wrist?

Recall Target:

As Pole’s computers crawled through the data, he was able to identify about 25 products that, when analyzed together, allowed him to assign each shopper a “pregnancy prediction” score. More important, he could also estimate her due date to within a small window, so Target could send coupons timed to very specific stages of her pregnancy.

One Target employee I spoke to provided a hypothetical example. Take a fictional Target shopper named Jenny Ward, who is 23, lives in Atlanta and in March bought cocoa-butter lotion, a purse large enough to double as a diaper bag, zinc and magnesium supplements and a bright blue rug. There’s, say, an 87 percent chance that she’s pregnant and that her delivery date is sometime in late August.

brbposting,

Wish the overly aggressive product placement were skippable, e.g. in Reacher:

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/76a709f7-8239-4aa5-beda-cb6b6cc8e90d.jpeg

I am down for hyper on-brand, clearly denoted, clever/humorous sponsored segments. StyroPyro was able to advertise a desk this way. So well integrated, honest, and relevant, I didn’t skip even though I don’t need a chemical-resistant adjustable standing desk.

brbposting,

Do you think Bloomberg could’ve won last time if he spent all his money?

With a net worth of $55.9 billion, 2020 candidate Michael Bloomberg is more than 17 times richer than Trump

brbposting,

I accept this as true for billions of people. How can those in destitute poverty do anything but survive?

But, say, upper-middle class westerners? Add in the most positive family dynamics and you seem to have an immense amount of free agency.

Curious if you agree or not :)

brbposting,

Good news, public urinators!

Everyone’s favorite website reports Europe is friendlier.

brbposting,
brbposting,

Well, here’s a video from Dr. Greenberg where you can see them more 3D (Piped link)

brbposting,

Oops, indeed, updated title from “Sand is beautiful under a microscope” since that wasn’t totally accurate. “Oops” because I had in fact suspected as much!

brbposting,

Something shareable that aims to inspire laughs, discourse, or thought, I’d say. Really broad, nowadays.

Term’s been around since 1972 per Wiki.

brbposting,

Memesis might be a new invention of yours :)

brbposting,

That’s too bad.

I hadn’t seen him before (heard his name though). After a month maybe .06% of the world will see a video he puts out - I’m surprised he has trouble meeting people who’ve never heard of him.

brbposting,

I think they were - site 404s.

Except their X-Twitter is faithfully posting I Can Has Cheezburger links a decade into it…

https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/7d306850-8d44-45ef-b5f5-b85d66eb7746.jpeg

In finding out what her meatloaf is made of (sexism), looks like Set Phasers To LOL became a Cheezburger Channel no longer worthy of being featured in their sidebar.

Thank you for joining me for antique meme lore.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #