@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

danielfgom

@danielfgom@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

You forgot to add different types of Terminals…

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Yes. My first one was the Z2. Coming from iPhone the Z2 was a revelation! So, so far ahead.

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

It would be nice for you to get a new Sony with better cameras and better life 😊

Ending support for Windows 10 could send 240 million computers to the landfill. Why not install Linux on them? (gadgettendency.com)

With support ending for Windows 10, the most popular desktop operating system in the world currently, possibly 240 million pcs may be sent to the landfill. This is mostly due to Windows 11’s exorbitant requirements. This will most likely result in many pcs being immediately outdated, and prone to viruses. GNU/Linux may be...

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

It’s 50/50. The last Enterprise I worked at they would NEVER agree to pay that. They’d rather get new machines

Is Ubuntu deserving the hate? (lemmy.ml)

Long story short, I have a desktop with Fedora, lovely, fast, sleek and surprisingly reliable for a near rolling distro (it failed me only once back around Fedora 34 or something where it nuked Grub). Tried to install on a 2012 i7 MacBook Air… what a slog!!! Surprisingly Ubuntu runs very smooth on it. I have been bothering all...

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Really? I wasn’t aware, or I’d forgotten. Can you go from non lts to lts in the same way?

Laptop not working after installing nimdow

I have installed nimdow window manager. I have auto-login enabled. Nimdow is the default option. The only options I have at boot are (from the bootloader): default, timeout, edit, resolution, print and help (help is not working). How am I supposed to go back to GNOME or disable auto-login? I tried accessing the recovery shell,...

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

If you’re data is backed up and you still have a live CD just nuke your install and start over.

Be sure not to do stupid things like “auto login”. Literally the worst thing you can do on any pc.

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

If your machines run X then TeamViewer, Rustdesk or Anydesk should work.

On Wayland I don’t think they will, but I’m not sure. I tried TeamViewer about a year ago and it wouldn’t run under Wayland.

In general, remote desktop is a pain on Linux.

Preparing to move from Ubuntu to Fedora

Hi! I’m seeking some advice and sanity check on hopping from Ubuntu to Fedora on my personal PC. I’ve been using Ubuntu LTS for almost two years now, switched from Windows and never looked back. But I cannot say I know Linux well. I use my PC for browsing, some gaming with Steam (I have AMD GPU), occasional video editing,...

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Misinformation my ass

Read. Then read again. Then read again until you get it.

From gnu.org “What is free software?”

“Free software” means software that respects users’ freedom and community. Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. Thus, “free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer.” We sometimes call it “libre software,” borrowing the French or Spanish word for “free” as in freedom, to show we do not mean the software is gratis.

You may have paid money to get copies of a free program, or you may have obtained copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to sell copies.

As you can see Free Software (and the GPL) says that the end user has the right to FREELY USE AND REDISTRIBUTE the software, AS IS.

In other words, I could get a copy of RHEL and without making a single change, could redistribute it or even sell it.

Yet Red Hat calls this “freeloading”. Yet that is PRECISELY what Free Software is about!

Rocky Linux, Alma Linux etc were well within their rights to rebrand and redistribute RHEL bug for bug to others. Red Hat had no right to shut them out. Yes they could have made them a customer and charged them for it, but they didn’t do that. And if I’m not mistaken they made the binaries available, not the source code. Meaning that Rocky and Alma would need to spend weeks compiling the code before they could even make it ready for distribution.

Now, someone could become a client of Red Hat, get the code and then host it on a server for anyone to download. But I have a feeling Red Hat would drop them as soon as they found out.

Basically RH now have a closed source mentality.

As for Fedora, stop being so naive. Were you born yesterday? I’m an IT Pro and I can tell your if my company set up a working group full of full time employees to work on a “community” distro which then gets directly absorbed into it company and used in our enterprise products, that working group is to all intents and purposes a part of my company since I’m freaking paying their salaries, and they are working on my freaking product!

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Literally the majority of the developers working there are full time Red Hat employees. It’s Red Hat disguised as community.

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Can you read? Have a read of what Richard Stallman says Free Software is:

“Free software” means software that respects users’ freedom and community. Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. Thus, “free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer.” We sometimes call it “libre software,” borrowing the French or Spanish word for “free” as in freedom, to show we do not mean the software is gratis.

You may have paid money to get copies of a free program, or you may have obtained copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to sell copies.

Read carefully. Several times if you don’t get it at first. Then go cry in a corner for being a jackass

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Ok, thanks, good to know. So perhaps for now we can give Fedora a free pass.

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

They shouldn’t have used Linux in that case because according to GNU, the FSF and Richard Stallman, if you use Free Software under the GPL you are agreeing to the following:

“Free software” means software that respects users’ freedom and community. Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. Thus, “free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer.” We sometimes call it “libre software,” borrowing the French or Spanish word for “free” as in freedom, to show we do not mean the software is gratis.

You may have paid money to get copies of a free program, or you may have obtained copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to sell copies.

As you can see, they are required by the principles of free software to let others distribute it, when without changing a single line of code… Don’t go calling us freeloaders when were practicing Free Software principles.

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

This is great. Just yesterday I was contemplating making a lemmy post asking for Linux channel recommendations.

Some of these mentioned were new to me and I look forward to watching them.

If there are anymore not mentioned please keep the suggestions coming 😊

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

No. You are too extreme. You don’t fight against your own people. It’s a recipe for disaster.

If you have disagreements you sit down, talk about it and find a COMPROMISE. That is democracy

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Linux Mint Debian Edition

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

I tried Artix once. It was very fast but I think there was some limitations due to no systemd with some apps that required the presence of systemd.

It sucks that some apps must have systemd on the OS to work. I wish Devs would do that because it would be nice to also have the option of running Linux with non-systemd inits sometimes.

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Beta testing is great. Just not when it’s for Red Hat(Fedora), Canonical, Microsoft (WSL) or any other Greedy Corp. when they are requesting this in the spirit of open source.

Rather beta test for Debian

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

I’m not saying it will be banned, you can still use it but I’m calling the community to return to community distros like Debian who are 100% libre and user freedom respecting… Plus there many dedicated developers and other volunteers who support this out of love for FOSS and the principles of free computing for all.

That’s not childish. It’s a call to get back to our roots. Use Community distros, volunteer your time if you have the skills they need, make a money donation to thank them and help the project keep going. That’s how FOSS is supposed to work.

By the Community, for the Community 💪

danielfgom, (edited )
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

I would like to quote for you from Gnu.org, Richard Stallman’s organization that invented the idea of free software. Here he explains what that means. I’ll link to the full webpage below.

“Actually, we encourage people who redistribute free software to charge as much as they wish or can.** If a license does not permit users to make copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license.** If this seems surprising to you, please read on.

The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer either to freedom or to price. When we speak of “free software,” we’re talking about freedom, not price. (Think of “free speech,” not “free beer.”) Specifically, it means that a user is free to run the program, study and change the program, and redistribute the program with or without changes.”

(Emphasis mine)

Source: www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html

As you can see, anyone who obtains the code CAN redistribute it unchanged, bug for bug…

I rest my case.

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Can you read? Read the full article.

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Agree 100%. And both are 100% Community. openSuse is privately owned and supported by a massive Community.

Debian is perfect for reliability (although opensuse is very reliable) who don’t need the latest and don’t like installing updates all the time. 100% Community based.

Two fantastic, shining examples of the power of Community supported software 💪

danielfgom,
@danielfgom@lemmy.world avatar

Well Red Hat put up a paywall so that only those who they choose, can get the code. That’s the issue. Then they justified it by calling users who want the code “free loaders”. That’s typical proprietary speak, it has no place in open source.

Ubuntu is downstream of Debian. But canonical have taken it, forced snaps on users, forced opt out telemetry in users and removed default flatpak support. All very user hostile moves.

Hence I’m calling the community to show these corps we don’t need them and community distros have everything we need while protecting user freedom.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #