Unless I’m mistaken but correlation isn’t causation. Meaning that an increase in tax revenue from cigarettes around the time some new subs were ordered doesn’t mean that one is paying for the other.
Is it unreasonable to make the assumption that the extra tax revenue in fact goes into public health to combat the effects of smoking on an aging population?
18+ Shitpost (lemmy.world)
Fortnite has changed (startrek.website)
"Piracy is a service issue.." (Image is a real story btw, link in post) (lemmy.ml)
Image comes from the monstrous work the Asahi Linux team did to get Netflix working on Linux on ARM Macbooks: asahilinux.org/2024/01/fedora-asahi-new/
fr fr ong (startrek.website)
Appreciate all the content though (programming.dev)
And I will die on this hill. (lemmy.world)
When your kids misbehave (sh.itjust.works)
Love and support (startrek.website)
Never change Lemmy (lemmy.world)
Source: lemmy.world/comment/5668411
Glad it's almost over (lemmy.world)
I'll just be a quick 3h (sh.itjust.works)
Yeah, yeah, yeah... (lemmy.ca)