@pozbo@lemmy.world avatar

pozbo

@pozbo@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

pozbo,
@pozbo@lemmy.world avatar

We can conclude your environment has no point, only semantic debate.

pozbo,
@pozbo@lemmy.world avatar

No, sadly it was much later than that. It’s like saying “shaq can dunk but this stupid fucking infant over there can’t even dribble the ball”. Yes, great point I am so enlightened.

pozbo,
@pozbo@lemmy.world avatar

Better to leave it with just the environmental changes we made without intent right?

pozbo,
@pozbo@lemmy.world avatar

I agree on the first part of what you said.

But we aren’t fixing the problem either way so what’s really at stake?

pozbo,
@pozbo@lemmy.world avatar

K

pozbo,
@pozbo@lemmy.world avatar

Yup.

pozbo, (edited )
@pozbo@lemmy.world avatar

Again, not my assertion but go on about my ignorance. Of course not all scientific papers agree. That’s why we have field testing and peer review.

I aquaculture cnidaria and get paid for algae abatement so maybe you could trust me a bit.

pozbo,
@pozbo@lemmy.world avatar

It appears they’ve already united and amassed their forces on that poor woman’s face.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #