@queermunist@lemmy.world avatar

queermunist

@queermunist@lemmy.world

/u/outwrangle before everything went to shit in 2020, /u/emma_lazarus for a while after that, now I’m all queermunist!

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

queermunist,
@queermunist@lemmy.world avatar

Can you imagine having principles that are more important than profitability?

queermunist,
@queermunist@lemmy.world avatar

Actually! There was no website. It was all made up.

queermunist,
@queermunist@lemmy.world avatar

You don’t actually know that, though to be fair, an actually principled stance would be to refuse to serve all Republicans and not specifically Trump supporters. In some ways Trump is becoming the lesser evil of the Party when compared to some of the other monsters running against him.

queermunist,
@queermunist@lemmy.world avatar

I’m actually surprised, I thought the reason they were reluctant to endorse the so-called Independent State Legislature Theory because they didn’t want to erode their already fragile credibility in light of the seemingly endless corruption scandals. Then they go and basically ignore the entire concept of standing and make a ruling based on literally nothing! I think I need to reexamine how smart I think they are…

queermunist,
@queermunist@lemmy.world avatar

Well there’s still 3 liberals that could be replaced by the next Republican.

queermunist,
@queermunist@lemmy.world avatar

I guess? But like, if the Independent State Legislature of California decided to go along with the decision and become the People’s Republic of California then the Court could just say “no but not like that tho” and then ban California from doing that. They must still care somewhat about credibility/legitimacy, but I guess they just couldn’t help themselves when the chance to attack The Gays was available.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #