Comments

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

redballooon, to lemmyshitpost in What's wrong with 'eggs'?

That’s the spirit.

redballooon, to lemmyshitpost in What's wrong with 'eggs'?

Doesn’t sound appetizing enough.

redballooon, to lemmyshitpost in Onions are a violation of the terms of service.

It’s frustrating how many of these systems rely on hard coded word or even substring matching, and that in a world of large language models that can evaluate semantics.

redballooon, (edited ) to lemmyshitpost in Onions are a violation of the terms of service.

Or maybe it was the fuck

redballooon, to lemmyshitpost in Of the tens of thousands of lies told, I wish this one was true...

Do they have a foreigner ms armee? They should enlist him immediately.

redballooon, to comicstrips in Drinking in your 20s vs 30s [Sarah Anderson]

If you’re in your 20s

redballooon, (edited ) to lemmyshitpost in Work smarter, not harder

Disruptive technology doesn’t follow cost covering logic though. Covering costs is hardly interesting for investors. Netflix ran at loss to grow quickly and cement the market share.

Recent enshittification occurs because the market came to an understanding that the fight for the market share is over and now it’s time to satisfy investors.

But several things can be true at the same thing time. Infrastructure is expensive and investors want to maximize return of investment.

redballooon, to lemmyshitpost in Work smarter, not harder

People always underestimate the work power needed to keep automated things running. And even more to set them up in the first place.

Many things that look like fully automated still have people in the loop.

redballooon, to lemmyshitpost in A good deal of IT work, too

Oh yes. With that sort of thing better double check each time.

redballooon, to lemmyshitpost in A good deal of IT work, too

If it spits out the wrong syntax my compiler will tell me immediately.

redballooon, to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

Introducing regulations usually doesn’t mean complete and utter ban.

redballooon, to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

First of all, gun laws have been more or less the same for the past 100 years in the U.S., so how can they be the cause of the recent rise in mass shootings? Simple answer: they’re not.

So guns changed over the past 100 years, but the laws did not adjust. Sounds like a bad idea. How can a new technology a cause for a new problem? Did that ever happen???/s

Semi-automatic rifles were not overly widespread before the 1990, and when they became, in 1994 there was a time-limited ban for semi-automatic firearms, which then expired in 2004. And what are the major concerns for mass shootings in recent years? It is semi-automatic firearms.

If they were serious about curbing gun violence, their focus wouldn’t be on mass shootings so much as smaller-scale gun crime.

Why do you think they want to ban all guns? But when you’ve a gun proponents such as in the US you gotta get real about what you can achieve. So it is not hypocrisy to focus on assault weaponry.

That hobby thing can be said about many forbidden things, for example smoking cannabis.

redballooon, (edited ) to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

“Just ban guns” is the slogan for demonstrations. Any politician who is elected for doing that will obviously need to have a better plan. Usually such plans don’t fit on a poster.

redballooon, (edited ) to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

Civilian disarmamends happened in various countries, i.e. Australia in 1996/97, UK after the Dunblane school massacre in 1996, Japan post WW2, South Africa in 2000, Colombia in 2000 and 2016, New Zealand after Christchurch.

Strategies and success vary, but it’s not unheard of.

redballooon, to asklemmy in Non-religious Republicans of Lemmy, how do you reconcile your non-religious convictions with a party that bases a lot of its policies on religion?

Many liberals have terrible views about gun violence in general IMO, and a serious lack of comprehension of the problem.

Could you elaborate that a bit?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #