@sorghum@sh.itjust.works
@sorghum@sh.itjust.works avatar

sorghum

@sorghum@sh.itjust.works

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

sorghum, (edited )
@sorghum@sh.itjust.works avatar

Courtney Love already did this

[QUESTION] looking for sandwich bread recipe

I’m looking for a sandwich bread recipe with ingredients measured by weight. I have bread flour and whole wheat flour and both pizza and regular Fleischmann’s yeast on hand, but no AP flour until I go shopping at the end of the week. If you have a good recipe, I’d really appreciate y’all sharing.

sorghum,
@sorghum@sh.itjust.works avatar

Citation needed

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33620844/

sorghum,
@sorghum@sh.itjust.works avatar

This one goes to the embryo

www.britannica.com/…/Basic-form-and-development

But at far as from conception goes, it has DNA distinct from both parents and starts developing until stopped. Even if not developed to whatever your standard is, it’s like a picture developed from film. The picture (or in this case, the human) is still there, it just needs to be developed.

I see justifying violence on certain humans as opening the door for society to justify violence on other humans. We look back on times when slavery or genocide was condoned and abhor that time and the humans that gave their approval to it. I truly believe that will be the way humanity will see society as it is now when medical technology advances enough to not need a human womb to develop a human to birth. That in and of itself begs the question, when a human is viable outside of the womb from no matter what stage of development, does that change how you view its rights from the earliest stages of its life?

sorghum,
@sorghum@sh.itjust.works avatar

There no caveat or exception. Don’t fuck with other people.

sorghum, (edited )
@sorghum@sh.itjust.works avatar

Your last paragraph is why I want nothing to do with killing humans just for convenience. Also look at my last comment with wantd. I posed a question about when a human is viable outside of the womb at any stage of development. Would it change how you view its rights?

Although I don’t agree with expanding government, I do agree with extending rights and protections to humans at all stages of development. I do consider that a different debate though mostly in line with who should pave roads, how police should work, and who should deliver mail (once again libertarian, not authoritarian Republican)

Also don’t worry about down votes. This topic is highly contentious and both sides generally see it the other side as a direct assault on their beliefs.

sorghum, (edited )
@sorghum@sh.itjust.works avatar

Derail the trolley.

youtu.be/aBS51qz0uYg

sorghum,
@sorghum@sh.itjust.works avatar

Some libertarians are minarchist meaning as little government as possible, some are anarcho-capitalists. Pro-life minarchists would be fine having punishment of abortion be treated like any other killing of a human. Anarcho-capitalists would rather not have government have a monopoly on violence.

If the NAP could be easily dismissed by just reclassifying who is and isn’t a human, then yes some form of law setting clarifying what a human is would be necessary. You bring up THE most interesting debate though in libertarian circles IMHO. Tom Woods did an interview with Gerard Casey about this topic. I highly recommend listening to the interview and giving Casey’s book a read.

tomwoods.com/libertarian-anarchy-against-the-stat…

sorghum,
@sorghum@sh.itjust.works avatar

You already have my answer: try to derail tram in order to save both. If I fail, I fail. Knowing that I tried to save 101 people is all that matters because in the end the tram operator will be the one sued to make the family(ies) whole.

sorghum,
@sorghum@sh.itjust.works avatar

There is no real trolley

Then there is no real answer.

Instead of focusing on who to save with a magic lever, I would instead focus on how to save both groups. I’m not sorry you don’t like that answer.

sorghum,
@sorghum@sh.itjust.works avatar

Not really what your criteria is being that I’m a pro life libertarian as far as ideals I align with most on what you’re looking for.

Even though I am religious, my argument against abortion is firstly a scientific one then on moral principal second. On the science side it’s a human from the moment of conception. On the moral side it’s that I believe all humans deserve human rights no matter at what stage of development there are. Just as soon as you make exceptions to kill for one type or subset of humankind you open the door to others. Usually this is done by labeling a certain group as not human to justify oppression of said group. Terms usually used to justify acts of violence against other humans are property, subhuman, animals, savages, clump of cells, parasite, etc. Usually for libertarians it boils down to having a code called the non-aggression principal which is essentially don’t fuck with other people. This is also why I’m anti capital punishment.

I hope that helps. Also, good luck at your family get togethers, lol. It feels like you’re looking for ammunition for debates.

Be honest, do you still use reddit?

I used to check the front page at least once every day, and occassionally check specific subreddits. Now I don’t look at reddit unless theres some drama, like mods getting purged, then I’d go there and enjoy the drama. Occasionally there will be questions that only reddit has the answer to so I have to reluctantly use it. I...

sorghum,
@sorghum@sh.itjust.works avatar

I only do when something spicy happens like all mods get demodded and see if they post a sticky to a new community like dndmemes did

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • localhost
  • All magazines
    •
    Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #