t3rmit3

@t3rmit3@beehaw.org

He / They

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

t3rmit3, (edited )

How I hate the lazy deflection and caping for Israel in your comments.

The Gaza Health Ministry is considered to be reliable for casualty reporting due to independent verification by groups that monitor the conflict like Human Rights Watch and the UN. They release specific casualty data including names, ages, and ID numbers.

The only argument that Israel or their allies have used against their released casualty numbers is that they’re run by Hamas (the Gaza government), but oddly those people, yourself included, never seem to dispute Israeli numbers for the same reason.

But keep up your propaganda, bro.

t3rmit3,

Got any examples?

t3rmit3, (edited )

You continuously link to conspiracy sites and random parties social media posts. Your evidence is a joke.

Show me an actual source from an organization that works in Gaza, saying the numbers are falsified, not another Israel apologist cooking numbers on Twitter.

You make a claim, that the Health Ministry is including the Al-Shifa numbers in their data currently, without citation, and use that claim to extrapolate that any numbers must all be false.

And again, your only argument is, “it’s Hamas and you’re eating it up!”.

Israel has released plenty of numbers of persons killed throughout the conflict, both on their and on Hamas’ sides.

t3rmit3, (edited )

The top one on that list is a comment condemning Israel, and the mods removed it. Several others, too.

It’s not censorship when they’re removing posts by both sides.

It mostly looks like the same 2-3 trolls posting inflammatory content that is getting removed.

t3rmit3, (edited )

If you read who I was responding to, they are asserting that this is political censorship of pro-Israel content. It may be censorship, but not towards a certain political viewpoint, just towards assholes.

t3rmit3, (edited )

Not attributing the particular mass shooting, but attributing mass shootings as a phenomenon, yes.

Don’t try to play dumb about your choice to call it a “lifestyle”. No one calls stabbing attacks “the British Lifestyle”, or anti-Muslim legislation “the French Lifestyle”, despite those things being common to those places, and them being infamous for them.

Lifestyle implies an affinity for something.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #