Yes as its just another link, but not that usable deployed alone.
For example, log in to unsubscribe. I had a few marketing emails does this.
However, when’s your last time clicking the unsubscribe link? I guess most people would mark it spam before unsubscribe, at least I do.
Most attackers will consider more eye catching, urgent, and time sensitive subjects like prizes win, exclusive discounts, or account security warning rather wait one clicking on the unsubscribe link. It is more resonable to add a malicious unsub link with all other links. Actually, all links should redirect the victim to the phishing page.
If your client or something leaks your IP it happens anyways, if you route it over one node or seven. All the extra energy is just wasted.
Yes. That’s how I see the problem.
And bittorrent puts even more strain on the TOR network the way it works. Probably making it slower for anybody else.
I understand and agree.
In the context of this question, I don’t really cares if the IP changes or if UDP supported or the network degraded. I’m asking a more fundamental one: when the data in the BT protocol contains sensitive information, then why VPN/I2P is acceptable but Tor (or other transport) are not? That sensitive info is still being transmitted. If that Tor blog is true, then no matter what we use, it is still bad for privacy.
I thought it is better as the focus is different: one is about “Is a blog post written 13 years ago still valid today”, the other one is “If BT protocol leaks information anyways, why VPN is acceptable but other’s not.” That’s the reasoning.
I don’t understand what the down votes are for. Disagreement? What’s wrong in hoping for improvements in a 13 years gap? I understand and agree that BT over Tor is bad, but two doesn’t conflict.
Will or can the HEVC_AMF encoder support Profile 10 or 10-Bit HEVC? I’ve installed the full version of ffmpeg into the ffmpeg Batch converter I use but can’t seem to get the two things together. I’m a little vauge on terminology but I think I’m asking the correct question. Thanks!
If you can’t find it, it’s very likely not supported. While AMF support HEVC encoding, its likely support the standard 8 bit, not the 10 bit profile.
It is hard to tell as AMD is quite vague on the encoder/decoder supported per model, unlike Nvidia. At least not within my 5 minute search.
Honestly, I would advice you get a second hand 1660S if you need hardware acceleration absolutely, like Plex/Jellyfin transcode. Otherwise, I will stick to CPU as that give better overall quality at the same size.
deleted_by_author
̶P̶r̶o̶t̶e̶c̶t̶ Obfuscate your content from bots and AIs (lemmy.ml)
Hey everyone, so for the past few month I have been working on this project and I’d love to have your feedback on it....
Hash matching proposals for the Online Safety Act’s implementation are dangerous | Proton (proton.me)
If BT over Tor is bad for privacy, why VPN is not?
This is an continuation of my last post, specifically a comment from @rufus:...
Is BT over Tor still not recommened? (blog.torproject.org)
It’s been 13 yesrs after this blog was written. Does the claim still holds true?
HEVC_AMF / 10-Bit HEVC
Will or can the HEVC_AMF encoder support Profile 10 or 10-Bit HEVC? I’ve installed the full version of ffmpeg into the ffmpeg Batch converter I use but can’t seem to get the two things together. I’m a little vauge on terminology but I think I’m asking the correct question. Thanks!