mander.xyz

Saeculum, to science_memes in Joy

Researchers need to afford to live, and that money comes from research grants. If this was even a problem, which it isn’t, the root cause is capitalism.

GreenTeaRedFlag, to science_memes in Vortex me daddy

I love labs were they are like “we use three tools. A toothpick you can get at any restaurant, a device invented in the middle ages that hasn’t changed and is still made by like 30 people tops, and the million dollar magic machine that we don’t really understand”

saltnotsugar, to science_memes in Vortex me daddy

Ah, but this one goes BEEP.

NoStressyJessie,
Krukenberg, to science_memes in C.R.E.A.M.
Malgas, to science_memes in C.R.E.A.M.

0.995 kg of gold and 5g of protium

Actually less than that because only around 10% of the gold created this way (assuming a natural distribution of Hg isotopes) would be stable, so you’d get a bunch of β particles too. I don’t even know how Au-201 would act, and it would comprise 30% of the output.

darcy, to science_memes in C.R.E.A.M.
@darcy@sh.itjust.works avatar

wait how has noone thought of this?

Aurenkin,

Yeah I think there were some folks who thought about splitting the atom right? I forget who.

Anyway, now I am become wealth, buyer of worlds.

StringTheory, to science_memes in Everything is a derivative of physics.

The ol’ “philosophy is just applied history, history is just applied psychology, psychology is just applied biology, biology is just applied chemistry, chemistry is just applied physics, physics is just applied mathematics, mathematics is just applied philosophy.”

Which I saw as graffiti in a university bathroom back in Ye Olden Days and has stuck with me ever since.

eestileib, to science_memes in Natural Malachite Stalactite (Origin: Arizona, United States)

For a non inconsiderable number of Hindus, this is roughly equivalent to a tortilla with blotches that look like Mary.

It’s a “natural lingam” and is an expression of the immanence of Shiva.

mayo_cider, to science_memes in Machine Learning is when machine learns, stupid.
@mayo_cider@hexbear.net avatar

The only areas of machine learning that I expect to live up to the hype are in areas, where somewhat noisy input and output doesn’t ruin the usability, like image and audio processing and generation, or where you have to validate the output anyway, like the automated copy-paste from stackexchange. Anything that requires actual specifity and factuality straight from the output, like the language models attempting to replace search engines (or worse, professional analysis), will for the foreseeable future be tainted with hallucinations and misinformation.

tryptaminev, to science_memes in Machine Learning is when machine learns, stupid.

Man i dont know. I had an introductery lecture into ML and we were told of some kernel stuff, where you look at a space that could be infinite dimensional and that you do some math to project into low dimensional feature space, where your seperation still works because of your kernel function.

That isnt some black box art form, that is clearly black magic.

breakfastburrito, to science_memes in This is my Vietnam.

A lot of those academic “printed on demand” books are like this, too. Very annoying. Yea they’re out of print and old library physical copies cost over $100, but the “new” ones always look like this but faded instead of over saturated.

Gork, to science_memes in This is my Vietnam.

EXPERIMENTAL

M.p.s are not corrected, Tottoli apparatus; IR spectra [ν/cm^-1^], Beckmann IR-20A spectrometer; UV spectra, _Carl Zeiss RPQ 20A/C or Pye Unicam SP 8-100 instruments (λmaxnm); Mass spectra (MS(EI)) at 70 eV, CEC 21-490 Bell-Howard spectrometer (m/e [amu](% base peak)); MS in chemical ionization mode (CH4, 1 Torr), GC-MS system HP 5980 A, Hewlett-Packard; ^1^H NMR spectra, Bruker WP 80 CW spectrometer: δ[ppm](multiplicity, apparent coupling constant J[Hz], number of protons, attribution [Eu(dpm), relative induced shift]), s, singlet; br, broad; d, doublet; t, triplet; qa, quartet; m, multiplet; δTMS = 0.0 ppm; ^13^C NMR spectra Bruker WP spectrometer (15.08 MHz, spectrum width: 3750 Hz, 4096 points, FT mode): δ[ppm](multiplicity, apparent ^1^L coupling constants [± 2 Hz]

Edit: corrections per ornery_chemist

Nakoichi, to memes in it's that time of year
@Nakoichi@hexbear.net avatar

I am a basic ass white dude and this is accurate.

nat_turner_overdrive,
@nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net avatar

as the small brewery industry developed I went from “fuck IPAs” to “hit me in the face with another pinecone please” and I’m not sorry

WarmSoda, to mildlyinteresting in This Seaworthy Guitar Boat

I wonder how well it plays on the water.
It looks like it’s a flat Boat.

( I’ll just see myself out)

bobs_monkey,

That’s a sharp pun there pal

HawlSera, to science_memes in 🐈‍⬛

This reminds me of all the generalizations RationalWiki jumps to when it wants to debunk something it doesn’t understand.

Mind you I’m not saying you can cure cancer with rocks unless those rocks are processed into the materials needed for chemotherapy

I’m saying this site is horrible at debunking things even when those things are easy to take part.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #