techcrunch.com

HootinNHollerin, (edited ) to privacyguides in Signal details costs of keeping its private messaging service alive | TechCrunch
@HootinNHollerin@sh.itjust.works avatar

I’ve been donating at $5/ month for a couple years to help keep it going but I feel I can do that down a bit

gilbert31, to privacyguides in Signal details costs of keeping its private messaging service alive | TechCrunch

It’s a very interesting read, this is the second year in a row that I donate to the project. I encourage you to do it as well.

iamhazel, to news in Spotify spotted prepping a $19.99/mo 'Superpremium' service with lossless audio, AI playlists and more | TechCrunch
@iamhazel@beehaw.org avatar

Couple weeks ago I did a cleanse and found my subscriptions had ballooned to nearly $150/mo. They should not be able to charge on auto pay when they switch the terms and raise the prices.

explodicle,

I hope it eventually switches from “give out the secret number to take your money” to “use the secret number to spend your money”. Then I can use a script, a third party service, or whatever to handle recurring payments.

agegamon,

My rule for a while has been to limit myself to one major subscription at a time. It really curtails the rampant streaming costs.

I made an exception for spotify for a while (so I’d have spotify + one streaming service + maybe one small low-cost one) but with how expensive they’ve all gotten I’ve reverted to only spotify and low-cost stuff.

Right now I just have spotify and dropout TV so I can catch up on Dimension 20.

iamhazel,
@iamhazel@beehaw.org avatar

After a purge I’m left with YNAB, Microsoft 365, GitHub Copilot, and a YouTube membership to City Planner Plays (s/o).

I’m particularly annoyed with MS365 because of how intertwined with Windows it has become, making it harder to get rid of the subscription… and it is kinda nice to reinstall Windows, login, and everything is just … there. Just as it was 20 minutes ago.

techwithjake,

100% agree with you. It’s why I use Privacy.com and set a limit to what it can charge. Stuff gets more expensive without me noticing, welp. I gotta decide if it’s worth it to keep paying.

(Sorry, sounds like a shill. It’s just saved me multiple times in the past.)

iamhazel,
@iamhazel@beehaw.org avatar

Huh neat! Can you still get points on your credit card for purchases do you know?

Moonrise2473, to news in Blue checks aren't protecting sex workers from X's porn crackdown | TechCrunch

News: obvious scam revealed to be obvious scam

dark_stang, to news in Israel’s startup ecosystem: Down but not out | TechCrunch
@dark_stang@beehaw.org avatar

“There’s a new war going on, is this affecting my investments?!” - some capitalists I assume.

ericjmorey, to news in Telegram CEO says app will continue to host 'war-related content' after coming under fire for Hamas videos | TechCrunch

In his Telegram post today, Durov — borrowing some of the more “high-level” language that other social media executives have used — said that “Telegram’s moderators and AI tools remove millions of obviously harmful content from our public platform,” but he also swiftly moved on to defending the app continuing to allow sensitive content under the category of “war-related coverage.”

“Tackling war-related coverage is seldom obvious.” (He does not define what the line is between “obviously harmful” and “war-related coverage.”)

“While it would be easy for us to destroy this source of information, doing so risks exacerbating an already dire situation,” he continued, citing how, he said, Hamas used Telegram to warn civilians in Ashkelon to leave the area ahead of missile strikes. “Would shutting down their channel help save lives — or would it endanger more lives?” he asked in his post today.

SenorBolsa,
@SenorBolsa@beehaw.org avatar

Yeah I feel that. Not an easy decision to make.

SNFi, to news in Telegram CEO says app will continue to host 'war-related content' after coming under fire for Hamas videos | TechCrunch

Well, after watching all those videos, it was hard for me to keep working on my daily… I think if people realize what is a war and what they are doing… they would be more interested to resolve this conflict. But we live like in a bubble, and you need to work tomorrow and be productive.

admin, to news in Threads is rolling out an edit button, and it's not locked behind a paywall | TechCrunch
@admin@beehaw.org avatar

This doesn’t belong in World News. Post again in /c/technology, please.

awwwyissss, to news in Threads is rolling out an edit button, and it's not locked behind a paywall | TechCrunch

Don’t care, don’t want to hear about Threads.

potterman28wxcv, (edited ) to news in Threads is rolling out an edit button, and it's not locked behind a paywall | TechCrunch

This is such a basic functionality. It does not deserve advertisements, it should have been there from the start.

and it’s not locked behind a paywall

Are we supposed to cheer?

jonne,

The bar has been lowered significantly after the Twitter takeover.

TheDeepState,

I think that last part is mostly meant as a criticism to Twitter, or x, and not necessarily to make us cheer. Either way, you won’t catch me cheering about any meta product.

GunnarRunnar, to news in After warning, the EU opens investigation into X over alleged disinformation | TechCrunch

Never has the word “alleged” felt so meaningless.

jabathekek, to news in Threads is rolling out an edit button, and it's not locked behind a paywall | TechCrunch
@jabathekek@sopuli.xyz avatar

Okay?

Conyak, to news in ChatGPT's mobile app hit record $4.58M in revenue last month, but growth is slowing | TechCrunch

And we all know that growth must continue exponentially or there is no point. Fuck capitalism!

Sina,

The problem is not capitalism, but rather venture capitalism.

enitoni,
@enitoni@beehaw.org avatar

The problem is capitalism.

Critical_Insight,

You probably mean infinite growth. I haven’t heard even the most avid capitalists advocating for exponential growth.

zerfuffle, to news in ChatGPT's mobile app hit record $4.58M in revenue last month, but growth is slowing | TechCrunch

Do people not know how to use the API? $20/month is obscene.

otter, to news in You can now react to messages on Gmail | TechCrunch

Why though

detectivemittens,

This is giving me “how do you do, fellow kids” vibes.

liv,

Yes, it’s a massive level of cringe.

Gmail is convenient, but if it’s about to be filled with 😊 and 👍 then I’ve got to stop using it for any serious communication.

megopie,

Because innovation is their passion, and clearly e-mail needed to be innovated on.

falsem,

I work at a large company so get a lot of emails. This could conceivably cutdown on the amount of "Nice job!" type emails that don't really have much substance.

otter,

Oh that’s a good point, it could help in professional settings

theforkofdamocles,

If it cuts down the Reply to All good job chains, I’m for it.

SteveTech,

Outlook has had this for a while, and I use it a fair bit to acknowledge that I’ve read the email, but without actually replying.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #