historyporn

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

HotsauceHurricane, in WW1 experimental camouflage sniper's suit using the concept of "dazzle."

SNIPERS! Give em the dazzle dazzle!

someguy3, in WW1 experimental camouflage sniper's suit using the concept of "dazzle."

So how well did it work? I can’t imagine it working well when it’s on land, distances are less, you know the size of humans, speed and heading are not factors, anything else?

Coreidan, in WW1 French Rifleman Behind Mobile Armored Shield

Mobile as fuck. Can take that bitch grocery shopping at Walmart

earmuff, in WW1 French Rifleman Behind Mobile Armored Shield

Fun fact: those things can only move backwards.

thefluffiest, (edited ) in WW1 French Rifleman Behind Mobile Armored Shield

A WW1 soldier out in the open? Must have been really early 1914 or late 1918. Judging by the helmet and uniform, probably the latter. Or it’s just propaganda material.

WaterWaiver, (edited ) in Color photo of a man and woman in Dagestan, 1904

@PugJesus do you have the source for this image? I’d love to find out more.

This version has been noticeably digitally altered, someone has used a clone or heal tool in the corners:

https://aussie.zone/pictrs/image/93327081-b8f8-4081-ac3d-2bebeff6ba34.jpeg

I assume the original photo or film must have holes or marks on it, they would be interesting to see.

I also have an (unconfirmed) suspicion that this image may have been a black and white photo that has been digitally colourised. It can’t have been fully AI colourised as the flowers on the lady’s dress are too perfectly coloured (even where they are hidden in folds or shadow). Alas the chroma of the flowers is shaped in perfect circles of pink, even overlapping black areas of the dress (where it’s otherwise coloured slightly blue), making me suspect a round brush tool in an image editor:

https://aussie.zone/pictrs/image/a21a605e-832c-484c-9113-8a5ddd01473e.png

I can’t be 100% certain, there might be some other explanation for this chroma patterning. It’s not JPEG (that quantises in square blocks, not circles). Might be some weird optical effects or multiple layers of JPEG on top of each other causing gaussian filtering (if you apply box filters repetitively at different offsets then you eventually approximate a gaussian). Not to mention that the version I downloaded is a .webp (and I have no experience with that format), I suspect Lemmy might have converted it upon upload.

PugJesus,
@PugJesus@kbin.social avatar
WaterWaiver, (edited )

Thankyou muchly :) Looking now. They have unaltered originals too!

There are 3 separate glass slides for the different colour channels. Ooh. (is it healthy to get excited about this?)

EDIT: This collage of the 3 coloured slides is itself an edited version, but it shows answers to my questions:

https://aussie.zone/pictrs/image/06016e55-ba98-4219-9740-9b581c059c9f.jpeg

They edited the left side with a clone tool to hide the fact some of the coloured slides/layers are a bit faded at the edges. This also explains why the left of the image is yellowish and the bottom reddish. Perhaps those slides were like that their entire life, uneven due to manufacture or developing issues?

Across the entire image are tiny coloured blips and scratches. Most of them were edited out.

The rounded shape of the chroma on the flowers isn’t as evident in this version, but it still looks blurry. It’s plausible that the super-round shape in OP’s version of the image is an artefact from multiple lossy image encodings POSSIBLY combined with the red channel (glass slide) having worse resolution than the other colours in these areas (?).

kersploosh,
@kersploosh@sh.itjust.works avatar

This is the kind of quality content we need more of!

jaybone, in Color photo of a man and woman in Dagestan, 1904

That woman has some man hands.

What is that little tower thing in the background?

It’s funny to me that they would take some chairs outside to sit and pose, why not just stand?

ArcaneSlime,

1904 in Dagestan, did they still have the old “5min exposure” cameras?

jaybone,

Yeah that occurred to me. Still funny to see these chairs in these old photographs, in places which must have seemed even to them at the time as out of place.

ArcaneSlime,

I guess I kinda just always figure the house is just off camera, like behind the camera man or 30ft to the right. It does look silly though lol.

Track_Shovel, in Color photo of a man and woman in Dagestan, 1904
@Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net avatar

This photo sent me down a rabbit hole. I ended up learning about the conquest of the Cacusus and the genocide that occurred during it.

Dazza,

Link for the lazy?

JustMy2c,

I got banned from reddit by linking that turkish genocide… I admit it was in a Turkish sub… And I mentioned that turks in Europe get more kids as Europeans (which according to reddit is similar to genocide)

Tier1BuildABear, in Color photo of a man and woman in Dagestan, 1904
@Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world avatar

One of his eyes ain’t lookin at me

hemko,

And she has the eyes of George W. Bush

Odo, in A 5MB Hard Drive, 1956

Pics like this remind me of the Elliott 405 vs Raspberry Pi Zero tweet: https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/b84965d6-da59-4138-9ffb-9e61d47c2748.png

JadenSmith, in A 5MB Hard Drive, 1956

The bald person at the bottom’s head looks like a penis.

zzzz, in A 5MB Hard Drive, 1956

Dude in the white shirt is jacked!

rhacer, in A 5MB Hard Drive, 1956

The first two hardrives I had experience were not that big, but still required to people to get into the cabinet. A Fujitsu Eagle and a CDC I can’t remember which model that had 5MB fixed and 5MB removable.

sir_pronoun, in A divorced couple divides their Beanie Baby collection in court, 1999

This seems fantastically sad. Maybe it wasn’t that big of an emotional deal for them, but it triggers something.

Hackerman_uwu,

Often, to gaze upon the bewildered is to gaze into the void.

HubertManne, in A divorced couple divides their Beanie Baby collection in court, 1999
@HubertManne@kbin.social avatar

you split I pick!

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

I wonder if this principle could be applied to voting districts.

HubertManne,
@HubertManne@kbin.social avatar

unfortunately it sorta is in that we have just two options.

drolex,

As per the ancient rule of brothers/prisoners

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • historyporn@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #