linux

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

TheAnonymouseJoker, in File transfer to USB drive fails after 4.3 gb
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

exFAT filesystem is what you need, and FAT32 is what you have. Windows (natively) and Linux (via Terminal) both allow to format it and change filesystem. You can use GParted GUI on Linux for ease.

GenderNeutralBro,

MacOS also supports exfat out of the box. So do most Android phones, TVs, consoles, etc.

It’s only viable choice for cross-platform use, AFAIK. Not the best fs out there by any means but I still use it on my all my USBs because I need them to work everywhere.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

It is one of the best, while also being the most viable for cross platform use. While journaling types and the more niche Linux filesystems are better, they are quite exclusive. My external HDD and USB sticks are formatted as exFAT and it helps when I use them across both Linux and Windows on my computer.

anothermember, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?

One that might be controversial: OpenSUSE Tumbleweed. I still have a lot of respect for this distro and I really wanted to like it but it’s just not for me. It’s the fact that major updates could occur any day of the week, which could be time-consuming to install or they could change the features of the OS. It always presented a dilemma of whether to hold back updates which might include holding back critical updates.

So rolling distros aren’t for me, everyone expects to run in to some occasional issues with Arch, but TW puts a lot of emphasis on testing and reliability, so I thought it might be for me. But the reality is I much prefer the release cycle and philosophy of Fedora, I think that strikes the best balance.

BCsven,

Slo Roll is tumbleweed with a slower cycle

anothermember,

That didn’t exist when I tried TW, but that’s something I’ll at least try out on a second machine at some point.

tkk13909, in I feel like breaking my windows install was a rite of passage

I too screwed up a duel boot which led to me simply wiping Windows! I’m glad it worked out for you.

cetvrti_magi, in I feel like breaking my windows install was a rite of passage
@cetvrti_magi@lemmy.world avatar

This reminds me of my first time installing Linux. I tried to install most recent version of Ubuntu at the time but for some reason it couldn’t install and it wiped out Windows partition. Fortunetely, I was able to install LTS version in first try.

I’m glad you are enjoying Linux. Welcome to the penguin land.

bizdelnick, in What would be the best way for me to recover data from my old laptop's hard drive, which seems to have a bad superblock?

Try testdisk. It can copy files from damaged filesystem without touching it. But only if you are lucky enough and the filesystem is not so heavily damaged that testdisk will be unable to find it.

vortexal,
@vortexal@lemmy.ml avatar

Assuming I’m using it correctly, it doesn’t seem to be working for me. It sees the partitions but then it says that they can’t be recovered. But it’s weird because it’s for some reason saying that there is two unreadable partitions called “ms data”, which unless it’s referring to some partitions that were deleted when I install Ubuntu, I have no idea what they are supposed to be.

bizdelnick,

Yes, it could find partitions removed long time ago if filesystem headers were not overriden.

EddoWagt,

I have had great results with testdisk. At one point my dad’s external hard drive was so messed up that a local IT company couldn’t fix it. Mind you all our family and vacation pictures where on there, so it was kind of important. I think it took me a couple of hours, but with testdisk I was able to recover everything

hardcoreufo, (edited ) in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?

Ubuntu - Loved it in 2006-2012ish but I jumped ship when Amazon appeared in search. Great place to start my Linux journey at the time.

Manjaro - Only distro to ever break entirely on me. I didn’t care enough to try and figure out why.

Tried endeavor and stock arch but they weren’t my cup of tea. No real issues with them though.

Fedora - I liked for a few years but abandoned after the RHEL drama this summer. Seems to be going the way of Ubuntu. Maybe that’s just my opinion.

I use and like Solus a lot but they didn’t update anything for 2 years until this summer. I use it on my gaming PC and an old laptop for web browsing but nothing important. It’s always been solid for me, I just worry about it going extinct. They do have an updated road map and seem re-energized though. I also think it’s a good beginner distro because you don’t have to dive into terminal much, and a good distro if you are a pro, but kind of bad if you are an intermediate user because there aren’t a ton of resources on it that bigger distros have.

I mostly use Debian these days. Stable on my server. Testing on everything else. I don’t see me abandoning it anytime soon.

Aman9das, in I feel like breaking my windows install was a rite of passage

Pretty cool

SnotFlickerman, in I feel like breaking my windows install was a rite of passage
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

rite* of passage

Telodzrum,

Which is not to be confused with the “Right to Dressage” from the 9th Amendment.

Draconic_NEO, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?
@Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

Ubuntu, because snaps break shit and don’t work right a lot of the time, also they left people hanging with 32 bit support which isn’t great (for being a Legacy OS for weak computers it’s not a great look for them, or all the Linux distros that followed them).

There were a lot of problems with Fedora and CentOS, none of them as bad as Ubuntu though. Most were either instability or software availability due to lacking RPM versions of the software I needed.

Arch itself hasn’t given me many problems but it is ideologically problematic for a lot of reasons (mainly the elitism) and it is also a rolling release which isn’t great if you don’t like being a guinea pig and getting software before all the bugs have been ironed out.

mlg, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?
@mlg@lemmy.world avatar

Arch: Arch

Ubuntu (and downstreams): Canonical

Enjoying Fedora. Find Debian (and downstreams) pretty solid as well.

TheAnonymouseJoker,
@TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml avatar

You find Canonical worse than Red Hat?

arjache, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?

NixOS. If I’m going to invest that much effort to configure a system I don’t want to have to put up with systemd.

Aman9das, (edited )

Same here. I really wanted to use it but it doesn’t offer much over Universal Blue

If i really need reproducibility I’ll use nix on my home

brian,

I’ve found nixos is perfect for me since I like how precisely I can configure it.

Oddly enough, I’ve had a decent chunk of my only barely technical friend group switch to it for the opposite reason. They all just copypaste snippets of config between each other, and if something breaks they just go back a revision. I doubt any of them spend much time configuring anything. It really is the perfect idiot proof distro and I don’t normally see people talking about that side of it

coolin,

Yeah, I think Nix is a good concept but I feel like 99% of the config work could be managed by the OS itself and a GUI to change everything else. I also feel like flakes should be the default, not this weird multiple systems thing they have. I also wish most apps would have a sandbox built in, because nix apps would then rival flatpak and, if ported to Windows, become a universal package manager. Overall good concept but not there yet.

oresafa, (edited ) in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?

Ubuntu Reason : Canonical

RiderExMachina, in I feel like breaking my windows install was a rite of passage

Linux is great about providing that feeling of discovery. New tools, new processes, new paradigm… It’s the best way to breathe new life into an old piece of hardware.

If this is your first major step, congratulations! If you’re a regular, great job, keep it up; eventually you’ll be a grey beard with the rest of us.

banazir, in I feel like breaking my windows install was a rite of passage
@banazir@lemmy.ml avatar

I’m happy you’re having fun computing and all, but I’m going to be that guy: It’s rite of passage.

TigrisMorte,

I think it is a left at Albaquarkie.

signofzeta,

All right, OP’s in the club!

Mio, in Why do you use the terminal?

Because there is no native gui. For most things to configure in Linux there is a webui but not a simple Gui built in. Configuration files like squid.conf smb.conf nginx.com… then we have logs but here I think I never checked for a Gui, does it work for remote ssh easily? Can you restart service easy?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #