linux

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

heleos, in What has been your experience with Flatpak?

I had heroic games launcher as a flatpak and my FPS was 33% lower than a native install of heroic

sir_reginald, in 8 Websites Linux Users Should Have bookmarked
@sir_reginald@lemmy.world avatar

this is just low quality content trying to grab a few clicks. it should be removed.

kirk781,

That website has always been like this. They occasionally publish articles and I sometimes visit them for curiosity but more often than not, many articles are sheer garbage.

Oh, it seems like they also started their own membership thing. Wow!

metaStatic,

with Anita in the thumbnail I'd be surprised if it gets double digit clicks

_cnt0, in 8 Websites Linux Users Should Have bookmarked

No.

taanegl, in 8 Websites Linux Users Should Have bookmarked

-1 for recommending r/Linux

+1 for recommending DistroWatch

MonkderZweite, in What devices run with free firmware?
two_wheel2, in 8 Websites Linux Users Should Have bookmarked

Add in regexr as well

Kata1yst,
@Kata1yst@kbin.social avatar

regex101 also excellent

SNFi,

That’s a cool website, but maybe more for programmers or hackers (I don’t mean evil people, just people that likes to use scripts).

two_wheel2,

Totally fair, and largely what I use it for, but it’s also helpful in the term at times to just get out a weird regex for a weirder file operation you don’t want to dork

SNFi,

Yeah right, it’s worth to learn regex for those moments when you need to rename many files with weird and unstructured names.

iHUNTcriminals, in CapyPDF 0.6.0 is out

You can cross post this to the capybara community.

just_another_person, in 8 Websites Linux Users Should Have bookmarked

www.omgubuntu.co.uk has some decent new and app update news here and there, and other generalized release news for various other distros aside from Ubuntu.

BoneALisa, in What has been your experience with Flatpak?
@BoneALisa@lemm.ee avatar

I just had to switch my work computer from Arch to Ubuntu becusse they want MDM on all computers now, and flatpaks are litetally the only reason i can tolerate it.

I now prioritise getting stuff from flatpaks, then the repos, and if they dont exist i use Distrobox to export any app thats only on the AUR for example.

mfat, (edited ) in How to choose a computer/laptop/device that is better compatible with linux? Are there certain things to look out for when shopping?

As a genera rule avoid Nvidia. Also google the fingerprint sensor and wifi model before buying. General advice like “Thinkpads are fully linux compatible” is rubbish. Take your time to Google all idiosyncrasies of your desired model.

Macaroni9538,

Im just most concerned about it being linux user friendly and fairly durable, as I tend to mess things up and wipe my drive sorts often lol hey, i’m learning! don’t game so don’t need Nvidia, check. don’t need a fingerprint sensor, check. so what is it that actually makes linux more compatible with some computers but not others? does it boil down to the cpu???

mfat,

Focus on what you’re going to use the laptop for and choose your hardware accordinly. Linux will work great as long as your hardware is not unsupported. So don’t worry about that at all.

winterayars, in OpenELA makes Enterprise Linux source available

CIQ, Oracle, and Suse huh? One of these things is not like the other.

It’s a testament to how badly Red Hat fucked up that Oracle, of all companies, is getting good press out of this.

ShitOnABrick, in 10 REASONS why Linux Mint is the desktop OS to beat in 2023
@ShitOnABrick@lemmy.world avatar

Linux mint at least in my experience seems to be one of those shit just works distros

miss_brainfart,
@miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml avatar

A lot of distros work really well on my laptop, but Mint has always been the only one that works perfectly

CalicoJack,

I don’t use it myself, but it’s been my main recommendation for newbies for years for that reason. No complaints yet, even from the less tech-literate.

ricecake, in Are older, but Linux compatible computers capable of running the newest kernel/version of various distros?

In general you should be fine. Might have some issues if you want 32 bit.

Most likely difficulty is if you get something with “weird” peripherals that has gone from support.

A laptop with touch sensitive buttons that was only made by Dell for one model in 2008 is something where you might have difficulty finding support.

squaresinger,

Old laptops can often be a pain if they don’t have mainstream hardware.

I have a laptop with a touchpad made by Elan. I couldn’t even find a website for them, but the laptop’s support page has a Windows driver that works well.

I put Linux on there maybe 5 years ago, and there just is no driver for this touchpad on Linux, so it works in PS2 mouse modus and nothing else. No multitouch, no gestures, no way to change any slightly more advanced settings like sensitivity.

probablyaCat,

Ha I had this issue once upon a time too! And the one above with the wifi driver b43-fwcutter. Apparently not great laptop choices. The touchpad situation was awful, because the sensitivity was always insane. IIRC I had a way to slow it down, but then it was so so slow that I had to go over it like 30 times to get across the diagonal. Good times.

squaresinger,

I vividly remember that time when I tried to get Linux running on my old laptop in the mid-2000s. There was no wifi driver for that card in the repo, but the manufacturer provided a driver to download. But it was in C++ source code that failed to compile because it was so outdated.

So there I was as a teenager who barely knew a little C at that time, porting the driver from outdated C++ to the then-modern version. It wasn’t easy but I managed to.

I am so happy it’s not 2005 anymore, when it comes to Linux.

CorrodedCranium,
@CorrodedCranium@leminal.space avatar

Yeah kind of a similar story but on my iBook G4 I had trouble getting wireless internet working with modern distros because b43-fwcutter (I think) was unavailable. I ended up installing Yellow Dog Linux to get around it

Macaroni9538,

So I really only care about the RAM for speed. dont care about ssd size, dont care about fingerprint readers, I just want a solid machine that makes it easy to run linux and also easy to fix; something sturdy. there’s nothing “special” i should be noting while shopping? is it just all personal preference with the specs and such?

ricecake,

For the most part, yeah. If you’re looking for a laptop the older you go, the more “boring” you’ll want.
Plain form factors and the like.

Sometimes, very rarely, weird laptop keyboards need special drivers that don’t always get baked into Linux, so it can be a pain. Same for older “premium” sound stuff in an older laptop.
Doesn’t mean that it will have problems, just that you’re more likely to.
Old midrange Lenovo or Dell laptops tend to be a staple for Linux. They also contribute to Linux, so their stuff tends to just work. Contrast with apple, where getting it to work with Linux is a hard-mode hobby for some people.

Base hardware stuff is essentially all compatible.

a.co/d/1exYlgM

That’s basically an example of a standard laptop you might try to put Linux on and expect effortless success. (It’s newer because that’s what came up, but it’s an example of the trend).
Note the lack of anything that makes you go “ah, a marketable feature to highlight or differentiate”.

a.co/d/iRv02YV

This one probably works fine, but I’d have some concerns about that touch screen and things not playing well with any sensors that make the folding action turn off the screen.
It might work fine, but it’s the type of thing that can take a bit of fiddling to get working, or just doesn’t because people don’t care to port the functionality over.

mfat, in What has been your experience with Flatpak?

I’m a fan of anything that would make it easier for developers to bring their apps to linux.

notthebees, (edited ) in Are older, but Linux compatible computers capable of running the newest kernel/version of various distros?

Probably yes. As long as it’s 64 bit, it will run without issue, hardware dependant. For 32 bit machines, you have to be more careful. The 32 bit core duo and pentium m CPUs don’t support pae.

Edit: First Gen Pentium M don’t show pae support as a flag but they do.support it. You have to set forcepae for some distros. I read the page incorrectly. Pentium M laptops that have 5 in their model number, like the 735 are second gen Pentium M

https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/eb8304a8-d5b6-494c-9fd0-96c03ab06766.png

ipsirc,

The 32 bit core duo and pentium m CPUs DO support pae, as every intel compatible 32-bit CPUs since Pentium Pro.

notthebees,

They don’t show pae support so some OSes have issues. This is specifically for the first generation. I have a Pentium M 735 laptop which shouldn’t have this issue but for whatever reason PAE enabled OSes such as 32 bit Ubuntu won’t boot. I probably screwed something up. It currently runs bunsenlabs helium as it doesn’t require PAE. I’ll amend my previous comment

https://reddthat.com/pictrs/image/66f30a3b-6d43-411b-b181-f0e924027da3.png

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #