privacy

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

niisyth, in Simple Mobile Tools apps

FFS, I moved from Quickpic for the same reason and now Simple Gallery Pro.

Ugh

e_mc2,

Yeah, exactly the same here. Oh well, time to switch again.

Predator,
@Predator@feddit.uk avatar

FWIW, QuickPic Pro ad-free is available by Cheetah Mobile the company who bought it. Also a modded fork of the last verion before it was bundled with ads is available from github.

niisyth,

Cheetah Mobile aren’t exactly well known for their business ethics. Partly why a lot of folks bailed.

ragica,
@ragica@lemmy.ml avatar

Aves is really good. Used Simple Gallery Pro for years and it was great. But switching to Aves is painless for me.

jman6495, in Signal Facing Collapse After CIA Cuts Funding

This article sounds extremely fishy and borderline conspiracy-like to me.

Imho the only guarantee of privacy I need is the source code.

Tum, in Two minutes of DuckDuckGo rearranging & dropping results for the same search; Bing, Startpage, & DDG all unreliable vs. Google :(

I am not a search engine engineer.

Here are some things it might be though:

It could be that the results you see first are cached on their servers, and expiring from that cache between your searches. however usually when something requested is pulled from a cache, the items lifespan in the cache is usually refreshed so it lives a bit longer.

It could be that certain they are NOT cached at all, and certain sites are rate limiting the DDG crawler hitting them and returning info to you, so DDG takes them out of the results as they cannot confirm the site is alive. I noticed reddit disappeared from the results and we all know about Reddit and their APIs here.

It could also be their ranking algorithm for results is not as deterministic as they want it to be, it could also be that way by design. Page ranking is a closely guarded trade secret, especially at big places like Google. DDG results will never match 1:1 with Google. Personally, I prefer DDGs results to Google.

brbposting,

Excellent analysis. Caching came to mind for me as well. Thank you for the interesting speculation!

ShroOmeric, in Simple Mobile Tools apps

Israeli, why I’m not surprised?

Darkassassin07,
@Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca avatar

Because you seek to inject politicized drama into every aspect of your life?

ShroOmeric,

Or bacause I actually read the news

Darkassassin07,
@Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca avatar

Lmao, like any of us can avoid this topic, particularly online…

Illecors, in Two minutes of DuckDuckGo rearranging & dropping results for the same search; Bing, Startpage, & DDG all unreliable vs. Google :(

I get the same issue all the time lately. Search, click link, go back - clicked link gone, different results shown.

akilou,

I get this but never clicked link gone. Rearranged or added results.

Squizzy,

Yep same here

Akasazh, (edited )
@Akasazh@feddit.nl avatar

I always use mousewheeldown click nowadays, it opens the link in a new tab.

Also mwd on the tabs themselves close the tab (without needing to hit the tiny cross).

Changed the way I browse

Illecors,

That’s what I do on the desktop, but on mobile there’s no quick way to open a new tab.

Ferk, (edited )
@Ferk@kbin.social avatar

Would it help turning on the setting to have the links always open in a new tab?
It's been a long time since I used ddg, but I believe they have the option in their settings page, most search engines do.

Illecors,

While this is not a bad shout, I hate that this rearranging logic has made it to production in the first place. Ddg should really know better.

LWD, (edited ) in Simple Mobile Tools apps

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • dsemy,

    They did not ditch WebKit for Blink, they ditched it for Gecko (Firefox), which is a good thing IMO.

    jvrava9, in Two minutes of DuckDuckGo rearranging & dropping results for the same search; Bing, Startpage, & DDG all unreliable vs. Google :(
    @jvrava9@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    I settled on SearXNG

    vengefulpunk,
    @vengefulpunk@supernova.place avatar

    I am going to give SearXNG a try myself. It looks promising. I hadn’t heard of it before today, but I am setting up a container for it now.

    Rootiest,
    @Rootiest@lemmy.world avatar

    I LOVE searxng!

    I will never go back to any basic old search engine again.

    Facebones,

    I’m going to have to look into spinning a container later, sounds cool.

    lautan,

    Are you hosting it yourself?

    jvrava9,
    @jvrava9@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    Did not get to doing that yet, here’s a tutorial if you want to.

    lautan,

    I think setting up a docker container would be easier no?

    Rootiest, (edited )
    @Rootiest@lemmy.world avatar
    lautan,

    Are you running this through docker?

    Jaysyn, in Two minutes of DuckDuckGo rearranging & dropping results for the same search; Bing, Startpage, & DDG all unreliable vs. Google :(
    @Jaysyn@kbin.social avatar

    No issue here.

    Cyberbatman, (edited )

    Same… it’s probably OP’s📱 phone

    brbposting,

    Is this to mean you believe DDG was presenting identical results with each refresh/new search, while my browser failed to properly display what was returned?

    Or perhaps something else?

    (I’m not an engineer, just doing my best heh - thanks)

    Cyberbatman, (edited )

    I did see DDG doing different search but all within the three 1st searches. In the meantime the results on Yandex after refreshing were all the Same … Hope that helps you

    brbposting,

    Thank you!

    brbposting,

    Thanks for testing. What did you try? Any of the same refreshing + intermixing completely clearing cache/cookies/history?

    My environment: iPhone 14 Pro using Firefox Focus 120.0. Saw the same rearranging behavior in Orion on iOS as well.

    Three users here (besides the hundred upvotes) noticed something similar: infosec.pub/comment/4407136

    phoneymouse, in Signal Facing Collapse After CIA Cuts Funding

    The bit about Tor is interesting

    knfrmity,

    Yeah, I got called an idiot for pointing out that connection here a few weeks ago.

    cypherpunks, in Signal Facing Collapse After CIA Cuts Funding
    @cypherpunks@lemmy.ml avatar

    I have mixed feelings about this article. It gets some stuff right, but also some stuff wrong and it misses some important details.

    • I don’t think Signal has actually received money from OTF (Radio Free Asia) since 2015 or so; if it needed any today it would likely get it from one of the less transparent US government internet freedom funding vehicles. There is no indication they are “facing collapse” beyond a blog post talking about their expenses and soliciting donations.
    • This article mentions “over a billion” people repeatedly, but doesn’t explain that number is actually referring to WhatsApp (which uses the encryption protocol developed by Signal). Signal says they have 40 million active users.
    • It doesn’t mention that Brian Acton (billionaire WhatsApp founder) gave them a $50M interest-free loan when he co-founded the Signal Foundation with Moxie in 2018, and became its “executive chairman” or whatever. That “loan” had increased to over $100M by the end of 2018, and is presumably much larger today.
    • It doesn’t mention that Signal Foundation president Meredith Whittaker worked at Google for over a decade, and co-founded a department there that worked alongside OTF on various internet freedom projects (and was later on the OTF advisory board herself)
    • it doesn’t mention the salient properties of Signal which actually make it particularly beneficial to US interests (keeping the communications of privacy-desiring people associated with their phone numbers while concentrating their metadata on Amazon servers)
    pdt8, in Signal Facing Collapse After CIA Cuts Funding

    Test

    Lemmchen, (edited ) in Eleutheria, for more enjoyable private, and secure communication

    I’ve used Jami recently to show my desktop to a family member that only had access to an Android TV. Worked surprisingly well.

    Melody, in Self-hosted rotating proxy

    Obligatory disclaimer here; I strongly recommend you do not do what you are planning to do with only rotating proxies. Tor is much safer and more private about this sort of thing; you will be de-anonymized easily if you do not use Tor.

    Now that the obligatory “privacy community” disclaimers are out of the way; I can say that I do understand what you’re trying to do. Frequently many websites ban the ever loving crap out of Tor Exit nodes and simply will refuse you any service if they even sniff a hint of The Onion Router on your packets. This is, unfortunately, an intentional design decision of Tor Project. You see; they understand the massive potential for abuse of Tor.

    Unfortunately…this probably leaves you, the reader, in a situation. You end up being required to choose to either trust or do without. In today’s world; that’s just absolutely freaking impractical even in the best of cases.

    Unfortunately the same websites who block Tor are also the same kind of websites with the kind of kinks in their panties that also motivate them to block Proxies as well! Seriously; if your packets come in smelling like they came fresh off a SOCKS5 tunnel; the remote website can often tell. Sometimes the website will be nice and wave this on through; but only if you include headers like X-Forwarded-For: in your request…which defeats the entire purpose of the damn proxy; as that header is for putting your original IP address in.

    So in the end your traffic will still ‘stink’; either of Onions or of SOCKS. Sure, you could buy a VPN; but now you’re coming from an obvious VPN proxy and websites that already hate Onions or Socks also hate VPNs; because they can’t see who might be abusing their service.

    Now you can try all three ideas and see which one the site will accept. Your mileage may vary and some websites indeed will block all three; Cloudflare, which is a CDN that also services many other websites and protects their edges from DDoS attacks is notorious for doing this.

    Best of luck. All I can recommend is a paid VPN plan, pay more than $0 and ideally less than you would spend on a week of coffee; and make sure that the provider not only does not log; but make sure that the provider also is verified by third parties who aren’t shady…to actually be a no-log VPN service. This will take lots of research but it’s worth knowing who in the VPN space are shysters and who arent.

    No, I won’t recommend a particular service; I’d rather you did your own homework and risk analysis anyways

    If a Paid VPN is out of the question; using Tor may be your only option. If you have multiple proxies you’re probably paying for them anyways and could afford a VPN.

    wincing_nucleus073,

    useless info for me and my aims sorry

    Melody,

    Yeah; without more information about your threat landscape, aims and needs; you probably won’t get more specific information.

    jherazob, in Simple Mobile Tools to be bought by ZipoApps
    @jherazob@beehaw.org avatar

    The good thing is that unlike the old QuickPic fiasco, here the apps are GPLv3, so these are 100% gonna be forked, still gonna see if i don’t keep all the eggs on a single basket

    Imprint9816,

    A fork has already been created by the other developer - github.com/FossifyX

    Gutless2615, in Signal Facing Collapse After CIA Cuts Funding

    Second day in a row this spam fud has been posted.

    tavu, (edited )

    Sorry everyone, I did try searching the lemmyverse for any previous postings of this article using “signal” in the search feature on my instance, but it turned up nothing at the time.

    Lemmy.world seems to have a handle on all the cross posts: lemmy.world/post/9121235

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #