LemmysMum

@LemmysMum@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

LemmysMum, (edited )

The word you’re looking for is omnivore, not carnist.

How many house plants have you killed not for the purpose of your own survival? Nobody can disregard life like a militant vegan.

LemmysMum,

I’m going to assume you can’t defend your position so you’re going to curl up in your ego to keep warm. Enjoy!

LemmysMum, (edited )

Consuming for survival is not unneccesary harm. All complex life takes life to continue living.

LemmysMum, (edited )

I’m sad for the fish because if they’re gone I can’t eat them, and they can’t eat the tasty little fish, and they miss out on all that lovely tasty phytoplankton…

LemmysMum, (edited )

Vegans just casually creating a class system to value one life above others.

We have a name for the class of animals that eat grass, stay in packs for safety, and lack the individual skills necessary for individal survival. And even they are smart enough to be opportunistic omnivores.

The only species of animal stupid enough to consume against their needs and instincts are humans.

LemmysMum,

Global catastrophy will never be as emotionally convincing as individual suffering. Why empathise with more when you can sympathise with less.

LemmysMum, (edited )

Disingenuous, ignorant, mentally deficient from years of choline deficiency. You’re right. If the shoe fits.

Eating keeps things alive, only a vegan would think taking something out of its natural environment and subjecting it to worse living conditions and a shortened lifespan without the purpose of benefitting another lifeforms ability to survive as being less harmful.

We kill for survival, you kill for pleasure and ego.

Classist vegans only care for sentience, not life.

LemmysMum,

Just because you can’t see behind the mountain doesn’t mean I don’t know what’s there.

LemmysMum, (edited )

If everyone has them it’s not a phobia, it’s a condition of consciousness. The phobia is being irrationally afraid of your perfectly normal condition. Which if you think you’re own thoughts are intruding on you, you may have.

LemmysMum,

Never claimed to be except in metaphore, I’m not trying to impose my thinking on anyone. Making statements is not persuasion, if you want your mind changed change it, but that doesn’t change the legitimacy of my point of view.

I’m not shying away despite the downvotes because they’re irrelevant, anyone who chooses to benefit themselves with what I provide will do so. No intelligent person has ever been without detractors, I’m aware of the value of the derogatory statements towards me, it’s zero. Because anyone lacking the capacity to see past their feelings for comprehension doesn’t have an opinion worth entertaining.

LemmysMum, (edited )

The lack of suffering I experience at the behest of my own thoughts is objective evidence it’s better.

whether anyone accepts that or not is strong evidence of your lack of maturity and life experience.

Come now, you can be better than that. I already told you the value of your derogatory statements, but if they make you feel more secure in your wilful ignorance then more power to you.

you are welcome to share what works FOR YOU

Apparently not since everyone insists on telling me to shut up. Like you. Right now. For doing exactly that.

You’re free to not engage with my opinions, it’s even easier than typing a reply but it requires the actual self control required to rein in your ego long enough to let go of me emotionally. But I understand if you can’t given the general sense of a lack of emotional control from people in this thread.

LemmysMum, (edited )

I understand it perfectly, this is a philosophical perspective not a medical one. My understanding of the term as used in medicine does not differ from yours.

The question is how does that change what a phobia is? Are you not aware how phobias work and are defined as according to medical literature? My statement is correct. If you have an issue with any of my other statements, reply to them directly.

LemmysMum, (edited )

I am a condescending pompous arse, an ego earned by being correct. I’m empathetic, but I’m not sympathetic to those who would ignore a way of thinking that is not afflicted by the same weakness as their own. And my apologies are entirely genuine and your disbelief has no bearing on that reality it just makes you look more the fool you choose to be if a little pomposity is all that’s required to keep you from knowledge and comprehension.

LemmysMum,

I wish it were so few.

LemmysMum, (edited )

I don’t disagree with any of that. But if someone wants to take steps to not being afflicted by their own thoughts you might think it appropriate to listen to those with the experience and skill to not be afflicted by their own thoughts.

No one here has any interest in changing their thinking to improve their capacity to enjoy life, they all want to bitch that I have no idea what I’m talking about, despite apparently being the only one here with a legitimate capacity to not be disturbed by my own internal monologue, and wallow in their shared failure to have emotional control over themselves.

LemmysMum,

Cool story, glad your shared experiences are the only valid ones because it involves suffering.

LemmysMum, (edited )

For it to be a complex my inference has to be incorrect and come from a place of lacking superiority. And yet not a single point I’ve made has been refuted. No, I’m just superior and have the ego to acknowledge that and the literary capacity to do it with airs.

You’ve also mistaken being empathetic with sympathetic and I’ve explained why I’m not the latter in several other messages including the one you just replied to. How can I not feel superior when every respondant has the reading comprehension of a 6 year old.

LemmysMum,

Yes. It’s basically a rephrasing of the OP which also intentionally didn’t use the words ‘intrusive thoughts’. I’m a master at being downvoted by people who have already agreed with what I’m saying, but lack the capacity to realise it.

LemmysMum,

Used to be every village had their idiot. Now every idiot has their village.

LemmysMum,

I had someone ruin this for me so now it’s time to share the love.

If John Mclane had stayed in his lane and left the situation to play out nobody would have died and a corporation would have been robbed.

LemmysMum,

Arguably the police would never have been alerted to the situation and the drastic measures would never have been required.

LemmysMum,

Ooh. Forgot about that. Seems I’m due a rewatch of everyone’s favourite Christmas movie.

LemmysMum,

Exactly, we might not have wealth, or support, or opportunity, or capacity, or willingness, or hope… but we have been imbued with the belligerence of life, so that won’t stop us!

LemmysMum,

“In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams, Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #