The problem is that some opinions aren’t just a matter of opinion but incompatible with other opinions. Like everything in morals and ethics.
Some days ago there was an interesting discussion in a thread on Lemmy about whether or not certain moral axioms exist that are objective. Or if all moral standpoints are purely subjective.
On this meta level, we can’t even agree whether those discussions are concerning opinions or objective facts.
In that cases one side would think it’s a matter of difference in opinion while the other would think it’s a matter of someone being uneducated or ignorant, for example.
I believe in some situations the other person doesn’t really have a choice other than to keep arguing. For example when the person they are arguing with tries to deny them basic human rights.
I can’t “agree to disagree” if someone has the opinion that I shouldn’t live, shouldn’t be free, shouldn’t be allowed to voice my opinion, etc.
You will pay for this [Salo Comics] (startrek.website)
Sources for Salo Comics...
deleted_by_author