PeriodicallyPedantic

@PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

What is religion, if not conjecture about the origin of mankind (and by extension the universe) that people believe without evidence?

I don’t think that religion is predicated on the answering of prayers, or in a Creator who takes a special interest in some particular human.

Also, I don’t think that either of those go against simulation theory; what if you’re a sim in some alien version of The Sims, and they’re going around fuckin with your life, removing ladders from your pools, etc.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

Some religions don’t either, and ST doesn’t preclude it.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

That’s an exceptionally narrow view of religion. There are plenty of religions that don’t threaten damnation for disbelief. They do what ST does and explain why humans exist (in this case because a simulation was set up such that they’d be created, intentionally or not).

And why can’t ST be used to scam people from money, like religion is?

This has the flavor of a true scottsman.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

What the fuck

PeriodicallyPedantic,

But how you’re describing ST isn’t incompatible with religion, only some religions. Nothing about religion itself says that the creators or some higher power need to be an active participant in the human experience.

And how doesn’t simulation theory allow for the simulation creator/admin to interfere with the simulation? You don’t have scientific equipment recording data on everything, everywhere, for everyone, and people claim to see wild shit all the time. But even ignoring the wild shit, it could be as simple as tripping someone, moving their keys, giving them some disease or disorder, or any of a million things that we can’t accurately predict even when explicitly looking for it.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

I feel like we mostly agree with each other, we just don’t agree about the extent to which FOSS is helpful.

I agree, although perhaps less dramatically, that closed source is harmful, and that you can’t trust it. I agree that FOSS makes trusting software easier (although not trivial, critical vulns can still exist for years), and FOSS helps democratize whatever the software is used for (although in the current capitalist hellscape, software tooling is a relatively small hurdle).

To me, you don’t need FOSS to build a (literal) guillotine, and you don’t need FOSS to spread flyers. It’s not necessary for a revolution, and recent history seems to show it doesn’t really move us closer to a revolution. I don’t understand the basis for your claims otherwise. Communication benefits from software, and FOSS means that we can trust our tools of communication more, but in the end we still largely depend on ISPs and corporate hardware. People don’t have open source hardware phones, running mobile distros of Linux, loaded with radical app repos, running a massive adhoc p2p communication network.

I see FOSS as a goal. I want to live in a world where FOSS is the natural state of things, collaborating instead of competing. That is the end state I want to achieve, but it is not itself the solution for achieving that state.

FOSS is the solution (in microcosm) in the sense that it is a good replacement for capitalism, but not the solution in the sense of doing the work to achieve the end goal.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

Making it FOSS wouldn’t solve the problem, because FOSS tools can still be used by capitalists to displace workers and erode worker bargaining power.

This is true of pretty much EVERY tool, but never has a tool had the potential to negatively impact so many in such a diversity of roles.

So again, the problem isn’t closed source, the problem is capitalism. If you fixed the problems of capitalism, then all software tools would naturally be FOSS, but that’s a product of fixing the problems, not the mechanism to fix the problems.

PeriodicallyPedantic,
PeriodicallyPedantic,

Cute little moving of the goalposts, there. Im not sure what you think I’m “adamant against”, but sure.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

Free Open Source Software. Do you even know what capitalism is?

PeriodicallyPedantic,

Lol does such vacuous psudointelligent talk get you much success in your circles?

I am adamant against capitalism, and I’m pro-FOSS. but I’m not delusional about the ability of FOSS to fix capitalist issues, I’m pro-FOSS because it’s a more-ethical way to make software.

You read like a teenager who just learned about FOSS and think it’s going to change the world all by itself.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

If you think FOSS can solve capitalism’s issues, you either don’t know what FOSS is or you don’t know what capitalism’s problems are.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

By “this” you’ve been doing FOSS for a decade and a half? And yet you’re unable to provide even a hint of a shred of evidence that FOSS would meaningfully solve or even alleviate the issues with modern capitalism? Paint me skeptical.

I haven’t been working on FOSS projects the whole time, but I’ve been doing software development for over 15 years, not including my time in university, so I’m not unfamiliar with the subject.

The burden of proof is on you. You’re the one making the claim, and I’ve also mentioned the patently obvious fact that capitalists use FOSS products to “improve efficiency” (reduce headcount) just to get the ball rolling.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

The idiotic catch-22 of credit, you need to use credit you don’t need in order to prove that you can pay back credit you do need.

Eg good luck getting a car loan or a mortgage at a reasonable rate if you don’t have credit history.

Ironically OP could probably absolutely qualify for a loan despite barely being able to pay off debts, because lenders want to make money off of you more than they want you to pay back their loans on time. Late fees and interest 🤑

PeriodicallyPedantic,

sort of

But I do think there is a legitimate ACAB angle here, to slice it by power dynamics instead: All political leaders are bastards.

It’s not just one nation vs another, it’s also civilians vs the political elite. So while I agree it’s wrong to say “both sides are equally to blame”, there are other useful perspectives. I think.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

Sure. But buying and storing fresh fruit just to juice occasionally seems… Bougie AF. Like meal planning 🤣

PeriodicallyPedantic, (edited )

My hope is to stumble into some role that is common today but will be niche in the future, like cobolt devs today. I’ll be some kind of java streams expert in 30 years or something lol

PeriodicallyPedantic,

They also borrowed the money from each other too, so each has a $25 card and a $25 debt. The debt will never be paid, and they’ll acrue interest with each other. They’ll all use the growing debt as a justification to cut social services.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

The sound of one ham clamping is an unpleasant twist.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

Don’t do really strong edibles and do pretty much anything that requires any kind of commitment.

You have to move? No. You have to not move? Forget about it. You need to focus? Good luck. You need to not focus on a specific thing? Impossible.

PeriodicallyPedantic,

drip is good. But dressing as an evil person is just screaming

I never thought leopards would eat MY face

PeriodicallyPedantic,

Generally you don’t want your leader to dress up as a villain unless it’s blindingly self deprecating. At least that’s how I see it.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #