Comments

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Tar_alcaran, to lemmyshitpost in Community note pointing out fake news once again 🫡

Unfortunately, the rest of the tweet also isn’t true.

Tar_alcaran, (edited ) to historyporn in South African diamond miner being x-rayed at the end of his shift to prevent theft, 1954

You might be thinking that getting an x-ray every day is bad for the miners, but this is a ye-olde look through machine. Yes it’s bad for the miners, but the guy looking at it is putting his face and uppee body right in the beam here. And I’m guessing he does hundreds of these a day.

Then again, old timey x-ray machines were pretty soft, so (edit) AND the miner is getting big dose of alpha and beta radiation too. And at least the technician isn’t breathing coal dust, so it’s probably a toss up who gets cancers first.

Tar_alcaran, to science_memes in On bats.

Traffic deaths in Thailand are 60 per 100.000 vehicles. In the Netherlands is 6. It’s 10 times a deadly…

Tar_alcaran, to science_memes in Spot On - Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal

They do, but the scientific phrasing is “ritual purposes”.

Tar_alcaran, to memes in 'political cartoons ARE NOT MEMES!!!' lmao

Yes. Or rather, it was flashlight photography, as opposed to “old fashioned” photography where you had to hold perfectly still for several seconds. Of course, flash powder existed before, but it was messy, dangerous, flammable and left a layer of white ash everywhere. Most people today would only recognise the pan full of magnesium flash powder from cartoons, but you can probably guess it wasn’t popular at parties or with hobbyists.

In the 1920s, flash bulbs were the awesome new thing, meaning you could take split second photos, and those could be action shots, and not staged and posed portraits. Taking a flashlight was doable quickly and easily, and of course as we all know, most random photos by random people aren’t great.

The name photograph was already used for the old thing, so “flashlight” became the obvious abbreviation.

Tar_alcaran, to science_memes in On bats.

I think that says a lot about Mississippi

Tar_alcaran, to lemmyshitpost in The world in 2024

Ukraine has wheat, UK has guns and missiles. I say let them use that EU independence to broker some trade deals.

Tar_alcaran, to asklemmy in Seeking Perspectives: Trans Athletes in Women's Sports

biologically male trans individuals

The preferred term is either “assigned male at birth”, or simply “trans woman”.

Tar_alcaran, to science_memes in help

Good news! You’ve got the longest side 100% of the time.

Tar_alcaran, to historyporn in South African diamond miner being x-rayed at the end of his shift to prevent theft, 1954

100% accuracy with enough attempts!

Tar_alcaran, to lemmyshitpost in How do you like this, sexists?

Ugh, women hogging all the talent, with their training and their skills, making the rest of us look like shit just cause we’re lazy and don’t do shit.

Tar_alcaran, to movies in Why is everything a sequel, reboot or remake?

Shawshank Redemption was a book. The Godfather was a book. Lord of the Rings, Forrest Gump, Fight Club, Goodfellas, Silence of the Lambs… That’s just from the first 25 of IMDB’S top 250.

From the top 10, only Pulp Fiction is original and not a sequel. If you go to the top 20, you can add Inception, The Matrix and Se7en. That’s 4 out of 20 (or 1 out of 10). There’s a lot more original material beyond the top 25 though, but your point that every great movie is a “ripoff” very much stands.

Tar_alcaran, to asklemmy in Ancient wisdom often sounds like common sense now that it is commomly taught. What is some ancient wisdom that we no longer teach because it was wrong?

illegal to wash your car out on the street because it pollutes the ground.

If you have a rainwater sewer, you’re basically pouring soap and oil straight into the nearest river or lake.

Tar_alcaran, (edited ) to science_memes in Slap a "quantum" on it = Instant flux capacitor

The big problem isn’t that the math is hard, or that’s often impossible to visualise. The problem is that a whole bunch of charlatans intentionally misinterpret what “observing” is in QM, to make money off of gullible victims.

Tar_alcaran, to science_memes in Remove all barriers in the way of science

Also, we need barriers related to quality, otherwise you get shit like Andrew Wakefield trying to sell his alternative vaccine, and in the process creating the modern antivax movement

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #