Comments

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

UndercoverUlrikHD, to privacy in Lemmy instance admin snooping at votes
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

I think the idea is to make it easier to detect trolling/spam from certain accounts. But honestly, there’s no reason upvotes and downvotes can’t just be public.

UndercoverUlrikHD, to lemmyshitpost in Learn something new every day
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar
UndercoverUlrikHD, to lemmyshitpost in Learn something new every day
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

Everyone are playing the game, people who don’t know about it are just better at it than everyone else. That’s the whole point of it.

UndercoverUlrikHD, to lemmyshitpost in Learn something new every day
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

*we

UndercoverUlrikHD, to lemmyshitpost in Learn something new every day
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

A game where the goal is to not think about the game. Which means reading “you/I lost the game” makes you think about the game, therefore losing.

UndercoverUlrikHD, to programmer_humor in Programming: The Horror Game
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

ಠ_ಠ

UndercoverUlrikHD, to programmer_humor in Programming: The Horror Game
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

How does ed work?

UndercoverUlrikHD, to memes in This is for something else.
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

What if you scare our common ancestor to run across the ground to safety and end up getting eaten by a predator that sees it running?

UndercoverUlrikHD, to memes in Playing an unsupported file
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

mpv is more effective. Worse user interface though

UndercoverUlrikHD, to memes in I will rue the day this inevitably happens.
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

If a game is on GOG, I’d rather buy it there than on steam. Steam is great and they do a lot of great stuff, but you don’t own the game if you buy it through steam.

UndercoverUlrikHD, to lemmyshitpost in R.I.P.
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

The world went crazy after 2016. The mayans were only off by 4 years.

UndercoverUlrikHD, to asklemmy in What is your favorite part of the day?
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

05:15-06:45 while I’m at the gym, quickly followed up by the worst part of the day, shower and breakfast.

UndercoverUlrikHD, to selfhosted in Comparing compression in AV1, x264, and x265
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

Frankly, for anything other than real-time encoding, I don’t actually consider encoding time to be a huge deal. None of my encodes were slower than 3fps on my 5800x3d, which is plenty for running on my media server as overnight job. For real-time encoding, I would just grab a Intel Arc card, and redo the whole thing since the bitrates will be different anyways.

Encoding speed heavily depends on your preset. Veryslow will give you better compression than medium or fast, but at a heavy expense of encoding speed. You’re not gonna re-encode a movie overnight on slow preset. GPU encoding will also give you worse result than CPU encode so that’s something one would have to take into consideration. It’s not a big deal when you’re streaming, but if it’s for video files, I’d much prefer using the CPU.

I consider the ‘good enough’ level to be, if I didn’t pixel peep, I couldn’t tell the difference. The visually lossless levels were the first crf levels where I couldn’t tell a quality difference even when pixel peeping with imgsli. I also included VAMF results, which say that the quality loss levels are all the same at a pixel level.

I was mostly talking about how you organised your table by using CRF values as the rows. It implies that one should compare the results in each row, however that wouldn’t be a comparison that makes much sense. E.g. looking at row “24” one might think that av1 is less effective than h264/5 due to greater file size, but the video quality is vastly different. A more “informative” way to present the data might have been to organise each row by their vmaf score.

Hopefully I don’t come across as too cross or argumentative, just want to give some feedback on how to present the data in clearer way for people who aren’t familiar with how encoding works.

UndercoverUlrikHD, to selfhosted in Comparing compression in AV1, x264, and x265
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

Feels like certain information is missing. You get very different results both in encoding time and file size depending what preset you use.

CRF value also can’t be translated 1:1 between codecs so comparing e.g. h265 CRF 21 to h264 CRF 21 doesn’t mean much.

UndercoverUlrikHD, to lemmyshitpost in Sophie's choice 70s edition
@UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev avatar

16 is pretty normal in both the US and Europe

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #