atomkarinca

@atomkarinca@lemmygrad.ml

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

"Must Try" distros and DEs?

Hey folks! I’m getting a fresh laptop for the first time in about a decade (Framework 16) in a couple of months and am looking forward to doing some low-level tinkering both on the OS and hardware. I’m planning to convert into a “cyberdeck” with quick-release hinges for the screen since I usually use an HMD, built-in...

atomkarinca,

if you’re looking for an original distro, you should try void. it’s super lightweight. i used to keep away from gentoo because it was a source only distro, i would otherwise go fulltime on it, but now that it also has binary compatibility you should check that out, too.

as for wm, i love wayfire as a floating wm, and sway as a tiling wm.

atomkarinca,

which was made possible thanks to public funding.

What is a small .EPUB reader that is easy to install for my small Puppy remaster?

My question is basically the title. I’m making my own Puppy Linux remaster and it already has a .PDF reader for it that is very small. I think it’s called Evince? It has a native GTK UI and starts in a second, uses very little RAM and CPU. Now I need a .EPUB reader. I’ve seen a couple different .EPUB reader apps out there...

atomkarinca,

zathura is amazingly lightweight and does the job right. i even use that on my phone (which is not that powerful).

atomkarinca,

the other day i asked my coworkers that “doesn’t that bother you that some of your apps are always listening to you?” they said “i’m not saying anything illegal and when i see a product that i was talking about, it’s almost like a reminder, otherwise i would forget all abou it”.

i gave up.

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • atomkarinca,

    alpine and void linux are pretty lightweight.

    atomkarinca,

    he chatgpt, finish this construction robot.

    atomkarinca,

    i have a t420 and running up-to-date void linux perfectly fine.

    atomkarinca,

    i guess it’s from 2011.

    atomkarinca,

    the colonial occupation means a continuous state of war, so it makes it a war crime. maybe you should stop being a debatebro.

    atomkarinca,

    “Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions;”

    www.un.org/en/…/war-crimes.shtml

    2/b/xxv

    atomkarinca,

    no, the ottomans were the occupiers, so thats just not my logic.

    and the same goes for the rest.

    this discussion turned into a loop, so i guess good day to you.

    atomkarinca,

    how are they similar atrocities?

    did hamas lock 2.5 million people in the worlds most dense open air prison?

    did hamas systematically crushed their buildings and not let concrete inside?

    did hamas shoot little kids just for throwing rocks?

    did hamas systematically murdered press, medics on the field?

    did hamas control israelis food intake?

    did hamas very deliberately snipe the knees of people peacefully protesting?

    did hamas cut electricity, water, food?

    did hamas bombed places that palestinian prisoners stayed?

    did hamas tell people to leave the city and bomb the only way out?

    what did hamas do? the only thing left to do when you do all of those things to a people.

    atomkarinca,

    no im not saying that, youre saying that. you are equating what israel has done for 75 years to mere reaction to that. you may not believe that hamas is not killing civilians on purpose and i cannot change that, but that does not change reality.

    we have seen just war crimes over war crimes from israel just for the past few days. this is on top of decades of apartheid.

    i could accept death for myself, too. but not for my daughter.

    atomkarinca,

    you would have the ability? how?

    atomkarinca,

    “2. Reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for their independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial domination, apartheid and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle;” www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-184195/

    war crimes:

    • Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly;
    • Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated;
    • Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which are not military objectives;
    • The transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies, or the deportation or transfer of all or parts of the population of the occupied territory within or outside this territory;
    • Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives;
    • Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions; www.un.org/en/…/war-crimes.shtml

    these are the ones that were committed in just few days.

    atomkarinca,

    i have been saying the same thing from the beginning, but i think your perspective of the situation is holding you back from understanding what im saying.

    you can put innocent people anywhere in the world and they dont stop being innocent. but that does not change the fact that they are in someone elses home illegally.

    if they did not want to be in someone elses home then it is the fault of the government, if they did want to be in someome elses home then it is their fault.

    atomkarinca,

    your assumption is wrong.

    israel displaced millions of palestinians and replaced them with settlers. the blood is on israel government not hamas. they could easily not replace millions of people and we would not be here today.

    atomkarinca,

    ok then look at the demographic between 1917~1948, you will see how the land was not bought but stolen, not from the ottomans but the british.

    when you illegally occupy a land long enough, it does not make the occupation go away. its still an occupied territory.

    atomkarinca,

    so tell me then, how would you behave if you were a palestinian? just accept death?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #