@hark@lemmy.world avatar

hark

@hark@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

I shop at Aldi, buy only basic ingredients (as little prepared foods as possible), and eat less. Snacks are basically out, though I may get peanuts from time to time.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

I remember thinking the age of censorship was over with the death of television. Naive me didn’t realize it was advertisers who were the driving force behind that censorship. Not sure why it’s being censored here, other than censorship being so pervasive that people feel that’s just what they’re supposed to do.

What are the best steps to reduce the wealth of billionaires?

There are a myriad of news articles here on Lemmy that display the abhorrent influence billionaires have on our society (especially the US, where I reside). I consistently read comments where the posters appear hopeless and despondent of the situation, while others jokingly refer to the guillotine....

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

They will not stop if they determine that the cost is outweighed by the benefit, that’s what makes them greedy. They need to be suitably punished or they’re just going to continue their ways.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

Mostly because I’m horny but sometimes because I want an easier time going to sleep.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

These are the types that went on to work for wall street.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

I had one at my old workplace and it certainly served me better coffee than the mud I could get from the mcdonalds across the road.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

Any actual information on the spyware or nah?

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

Could you link to any source that talks about this spyware or are you just going to insult me for not knowing about every single thing that is going on? Clearly this is an important issue for you, so I would love to gain some knowledge from you on this subject.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

What sort of spyware do they employ?

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

You’re saying that choice isn’t good and that people need to choose better (perhaps choosing more like you?). Skip the pretense and only have one choice.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

The withdrawals are a pain, but they do eventually go away… until I have little a snack (as a treat) and the cravings come back something fierce. Still, my laziness not wanting to go to the store outweighs my cravings.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

I mostly drink instant coffee. I’m also a dirty Windows user who mainly uses WSL (with the Ubuntu distro on that) for my Linux needs.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

Yes, but what about upvotes and downvotes?

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

I’m old enough to remember when democrats pointed out how horrible george w bush was while he was president (and rightfully so), but have only sucked his dick since then. Sorry, I don’t trust democrats to save a goddamn thing. Your padded and fluffed up lists don’t change that. I’ll continue voting for democrats down the entire ballot every single election, but I’m not stupid enough to think it will change anything.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

newrepublic.com/…/democrats-keep-embracing-george…

www.youtube.com/watch?v=dojOO3VZ4Jc

As for your lists, all it takes is a glance to immediately see the padding and fluff. For example, there are multiple lines dedicated to student loan forgiveness which is hilarious, seeing as Biden was a key figure in creating the student loan crisis in the first place:

theguardian.com/…/joe-biden-student-loan-debt-200…

theintercept.com/2020/…/joe-biden-student-loans/

So while he can brag about a few billions here and there freed up by enforcing rules that already existed, the student loan problem is now around $1.7 trillion and none of his policies address the loans that are currently being taken nor the loans being taken out in the future. In other words, he’s not solving the problem, not even ones he helped create himself. That’s really democrats in a nutshell: play along with republicans to create problems and then present themselves as “the thin blue line” that protects us by providing minor relief. One step forward and five steps back means you’re still going backward.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

The example you gave doesn’t make sense. First off you confused public trading (company shares are available to the general public) with public ownership (owned by the government i.e. “the public” at large). Johnson and Johnson is publicly traded but the shares are held by private entities. If I buy a share of Johnson and Johnson’s stock, I privately own a piece of Johnson and Johnson.

As for drug patents (and patents in general), the idea is to secure timed exclusivity to sell in the market in exchange for public disclosure of method of invention. If we didn’t have patents, companies would instead treat drug formulations as trade secrets and so they’d hold onto that exclusivity as long as they can keep the formulation a secret or until another entity reinvents the same thing. There are issues with the patent process and especially with private companies benefiting from publicly-funded research while locking up exclusivity and jacking up prices, but those are still problems with capitalism, and they’re still better than just letting the free market completely monopolize the process.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

Do you not understand what the point of a public offering is? It’s to offer up shares of your company to others in order to raise funds so you can expand more rapidly. You throwing in the word “collective” is a poor game of word association. Are you trying to argue that publicly-traded companies are communist? You should really hit the books and straighten out your terminology because you’re using it all wrong and you’re only misleading others who don’t know any better.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

You’re either trolling or incredibly ignorant. Get educated, that’s all I’m going to say to you now.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

I never said public corporations are private companies. You’re confused and don’t seem to have a point to make. Do you think publicly-traded companies are not capitalist?

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

You’re saying it’s not capitalist because of government involvement, but the government has to be involved in order to enforce capitalism. A private entity can claim ownership over something, but what enforces that claim? I said “the less government control the better” as in better for the monopolistic companies who wouldn’t have regulators threatening to break up their monopoly or having to pay them off.

I didn’t say anything regarding what you advocate, I’m just pointing out that capitalism requires statement enforcement, so pretending that government involvement is not capitalist is wrong. I’m also pointing out that the situation would be worse without certain regulations such as anti-trust laws because capitalism naturally converges on monopolies.

hark,
@hark@lemmy.world avatar

Technology is deflationary, but you don’t see the tech industry crashing as people wait for steep discounts far exceeding 1% over a couple years or so. Deflation is made out to be a boogeyman because it means the peasants get a pay increase if they keep the same wage unlike the pay cuts they currently receive through inflation.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #