@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

helenslunch

@helenslunch@feddit.nl

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

Because Windows blows.

Saved you a click.

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

I’m not moving the goal posts, you just ignored one of them.

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

Yeah no shit. I didn’t remove anything. Just added it. The part you ignored is still there.

Go ahead and honor your promise to be “out”.

helenslunch, (edited )
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

Of course the pi 4 is still part of the product range. It’s still being actively manufactured and sold.

Its a 5-year old product. With 5 year old specs.

As far as memory size, that wasn’t part of your original complaint.

Yes I also didn’t specify a clock speed, storage size, network speed, etc. What I meant was a modern version of an old product with similarly modern specs.

$35 in 2012 is $47 today

And yet the Pi5 starts at $60.

You’re also missing the other half of this conversation where other SBCs have come way down in price.

Le Potato, Orange Pi, Zima products, Rockchip, not to mention all the X86 mini PCs, old office PCs, etc.

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

That’s nice. Let me know when they’re $30 again.

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

Biggest benefit of those things is that they come with SATA ports so you can use them to build a <$100 2-bay NAS which is about half the price of popular competitors but with way more power.

helenslunch, (edited )
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

I don’t expect it either, which is why these things don’t make sense anymore, and why I actually recently passed them up for an X86 competitor. Prices of RPi’s have inflated, supply has gone down to nothing, and all the while all sorts of competition has entered the SBC scene that provides a much better value.

Don’t get me wrong, I love the RPi and I feel like a real cool nerd with bare PCBs sitting around my house, but they’re just too expensive now.

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

Can’t do much with 1GB. And the Pi4 isn’t part of a “product range”, it’s the previous generation product.

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

Findroid keeps saying it’s not supported on my Pixel 7 for some reason

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

Specifically, the plug-ins are using our services in an unauthorized manner

By plug-ins, you mean your customers?

helenslunch, (edited )
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

This is the great thing about FOSS. Someone else will just take the code and reupload it. If they want it removed from GitHub, they can deal with Microsoft. At which point it’ll just be re-uploaded again. There’s nothing illegal about it.

So Haier suffers the Streisand effect and the people who want to simply continue using it.

Is it possible to use Google Drive reliably?

I’ve been using Google Drive in Windows for about a decade and have a good workflow. I recently transitioned to Linux but cannot seem to reliably connect my drive to the filesystem. My work provides unlimited Drive space and since it’s for work I have shared directories with coworkers that I need access to every day. Hence,...

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

When I pointed out that that makes no difference…then you switched to another reason.

It’s not another reason. It’s the same reason.

If it wasn’t encrypted it would be trivial to spin up a local integration like Google or MS already have.

Since it is encrypted, it makes it significantly more complicated to develop. While this development may make sense on MS or Mac, it doesn’t on Linux, because it requires more resources and serves a much much smaller number of users.

I’ve already explained all of this in the previous comments.

My Proton Vpn on linux install works

“Works” is right. Like I said, it’s extremely basic compared to it’s MS and Mac counterparts.

the e-mail bridge works

Notice how MS and Mac get fully-featured desktop clients and all Linux gets is a “bridge” to connect to an inbox client developed by someone else.

helenslunch, (edited )
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

Dev is slow because they release a good User experience, rather than buggy junk

The reason is irrelevant. It wasn’t a criticism, just an observation.

Linux seems to be 3rd on their list but it comes eventually.

No, they have almost no Linux support. Most things have to be done in the browser. When there is Linux support, it is extremely basic.

Per the link you can use Windows or Mac sync now.

Cool. Doesn’t help Linux users.

Don’t forget google had a long head start and almost unlimited devs.

See point 1.

There was a long podcast interview with the CEO where he basically said Linux is and will continue to be looked over due to increased development costs and very low adoption.

helenslunch, (edited )
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

No, I’ve just been a customer for several years. Development is slow and things like this are simply not a priority. They’re not even a little close to matching Google.

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

Actually their pages say it is hard to find Linux devs for desktop, and that is why it is slow.

Again, the reason is irrelevant. The point is, it ain’t happening.

And as far as critisim you said specifically not as good as google, so I provide a reason why. you can’t then change you tact and say it wasn’t critism

That’s not “changing tact”. It’s not as good as Google from a user perspective. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t have it’s own merits. I pay for a Proton subscription rather than use a free, much more fully-featured Google one, so I obviously understand the value proposition. I also understand it’s shortcomings.

You seem to keep moving goal posts here so have a good rest of your week.

I don’t suppose you want to elaborate on what goal posts I’ve supposedly moved?

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

No but they won’t

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

Not gonna happen since Proton is all encrypted.

helenslunch, (edited )
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

As per usual, the explanation is corporate shitfuckery.

Video explanation

tl;dr the company Taylor manufactures the ice cream machines to fail without any explanation or diagnosis process, then charge wildly exorbitant fees to fix them, and cut McD’s in on the profit. Some franchises found ways around this and McD’s just ordered them to stop. So the franchises just leave them broken as often as possible.

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

I didn’t say anything about backdoors…

Intel mobile chips just blow and have for several years now

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

No I’m just referring to the horrible inefficiency

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

Not stupid, just greedy.

They’re gonna make money from selling whatever data they can mine from your mobile device and likely selling you monthly subscriptions.

helenslunch,
@helenslunch@feddit.nl avatar

If they were lazy they would have just not done anything and let the HA users carry on.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #