@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

leraje

@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar
  1. If you get kicked from an instance, upon joining a new instance, make your first post a furious comment on the admins/mods/hivemind of the instance that kicked you, completely forgetting we can all see the modlog.
leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Only in an American advert could a character come back from a major coffee producing region and think the shit in that tub is real coffee.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

You’re right, all any of us do, all day, non stop is gripe or insult American culture. Why only the other day, I was in the shop and when I got to the till to pay, all me and the cashier could talk about was America. “That’ll be £44.99 please love and did you see the latest data about gun deaths in America?” God, we’re so insecure.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I thought you people had stayed on Reddit. Y’know, the people who live to say shitty things to people and then sulk when they get edited/removed/banned and blame it all on ‘the hive mind’ or ‘group think’ or some other sneering put down when the reality is simply that most people don’t like shitty people saying shitty things.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

The Met are already using it - just not (yet) on bodycams.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

The Met are already using it - just not (yet) on bodycams.

The company behind it, who supply the data are called Facewatch. I’m not going to link to their site but they’re the ones supplying the tech and db. They did it by scraping social media sites as well as government documents and the plan is to add the UK Passport db data soon.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Most of the country are change hating small c conservatives who genuinely believe the state knows best and is totally trustworthy. They get their news from the Daily Mail or The Sun because Britain is the best country ever. Its the mindset that ensures we still have a class system, a monarchy and brexit.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Rishi Sunak, 10 Downing St London UK

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I totally applaud your efforts to find a solution to this issue but I don’t think this is practicable, at least in it’s current form. I get the underlying idea that changes to the extension will have to be continually adapted to by the scrapers but that’ll slow them down for a negligible amount of time.

I don’t mean to sound negative and I really do thank you for your efforts but I can’t see how this could be effective.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar
  • Like Reddit, KBin and Lemmy are 'link aggregators’
  • This means, in subject driven Communities (sub-reddits), people post links or images or their thoughts and others comment on them
  • Reddit is software that’s installed in one central location (server). This means it is owned and controlled by one single commercial entity.
  • Kbin and Lemmy are both software that are installed in multiple locations (servers), owned and controlled by multiple people and can be installed by anyone. This means no one can ever own or control the entirety of Lemmy.
  • Reddit, KBin and Lemmy can be accessed by users via websites or apps.
  • Reddit is centralised. If it disappeared tomorrow, it would be completely gone.
  • KBin and Lemmy are federated. If one instance (server) disappeared tomorrow, all the others would be unaffected and carry on as normal.
  • All instances of KBin and Lemmy can talk to all other instances of KBin and Lemmy, as long as they are federated.
  • Rule breaking and/or toxic instances/servers can be defederated by other servers/instances.
  • Reddit, KBin and Lemmy are all free to use. However, with Reddit you must contend with invasive privacy and advertising. The way to support KBin and Lemmy is to donate to the development team and the server/instance your account is on.
leraje, (edited )
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Well, Mastodon has been around since 2016 IIRC which is nearly 8 years and it’s still growing and expanding. There’s no reason to suppose Lemmy will be any different.

A large part of the issue of sustainability is intent. Meta, Twitter, Microsoft, Google etc are profit driven. By that standard, no fediverse software is sustainable because for-profits only care about continual growth leading to continual profit.

Lemmy is open source. No one who develops it or hosts an instance really cares about it being financially profitable so there’s not that motivation. The motivation is more akin to doing something positive for people and at the same time, indulge in a hobby/interest they have. If the people who benefit from it (you and me, the users) recognise that benefit I would hope they donate to its development and the instance they’re on. This in turn enables the users who can’t afford to donate to still be able to participate in a system where profit is not King.

So sustainability in the fediverse really means ‘can I afford to keep doing something I enjoy doing?’ As long as they can, it’s sustainable.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I wouldn’t have an issue with this either - within reason. But I suspect making an instance a de facto business from which an admin draws a wage would raise so many issues about a whole raft of things it probably wouldn’t be worth it.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Ask them when you can install the bug on their phoneline, open their mail and remove their bathroom door.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Been using it for over a year now. The clients were a bit ropey for awhile but they’re great now.

As for trust, only you can really answer that, but they tick all the right boxes for me - I can pay in a way that preserves my privacy, everythings open source and E2EE, they have good policies.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

“Your info won’t be used for ads”

But we’ll still be tracking everything you do and selling that on to everyone who wants it.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I have quite a lot of faith, but I think the majority of my faith is that whilst you’re right that abuses can happen because some people are cunts, there seems to be a groundswell of willingness to react to that possibility and tackle it.

The relatively recent CSAM attack on .world Communities is a prime example of that. Code was written and systems put into place (not by the lead developers it has to be said but by @db0 and others) to tackle that threat.

Privacy is not just an illusion; it’s a delusion

Privacy is not just an illusion; it’s a delusion. Things like privacy statements and permission to use cookies are little more than sophisticated propaganda. If you think for a moment the Overlords cannot prepare a dossier on you within minutes that would make your mother faint and your father die of shame, you’re living in...

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

The only way to live with this level of privacy evasion is to accept the reality of it

OK, Zuck.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I may be being overly pedantic here but that statement, whilst I don’t doubt its good intent, always reads to me like a bit of a get out of jail free card.

I’m not sure how much weight you can place on a recommendation when the full criteria isn’t know and can be changed on a whim. And yes, I’m aware I can browse the forum, ask and see for myself but I’m not sure your average user is going to feel confident enough to do that.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

A recent PG forum thread is discussing it. PG deemed it not secure enough almost three years ago, based on solid reasoning.

However, that was three years ago and the product has altered dramatically. I just don’t think it’s been resuggested/evaluated since then.

PG forum users (and PG itself) are pretty inconsistent with how they judge stuff. Not trusting one company (Filen) because there were issues three years ago (and are now, as I understand it, fully addressed) but totally trusting another company (Brave browser) despite repeated actions that erode trust is odd behaviour.

I’m a filen user myself, just in the interests of full disclosure.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

That’s the discussion that’s approaching 3 years old.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Disclaimer: not a security expert at all, just a working knowledge. However, what I read 18 months or so after reading that github thread was enough to reassure me.

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

How was that an ad? What exactly did you think was being advertised?

And some of us quite like tutorials as they tend explain not just what to do but why it’s being done.

Does the "Redirector" add-on affect your browser fingerprint in any way? (kbin.social)

I use it in my normal Firefox setup, but I've been playing with Mullvad browser and I've kept everything to the defaults so I have a good option when I want a little more anonymity without needing the nuclear option (Tor) for sensitive-ish-but-really-not-all-that-sensitive browsing....

leraje,
@leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I speak under correction, but I believe that whilst yes adding any add-on can potentially alter your fingerprint, it’s also true that a site has to test for the presence of that particular add-on you’ve added. I don’t believe there’s a way to test generally for the presence of add-ons and report back which add-ons a visitor is using.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #