Comments

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

null, to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

That’s not relevant.

null, to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

Better luck next time.

null, to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

Your next line can be whatever you want. Including more lying about what you previously said.

Nobody’s going to believe it though.

null, to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

Yes you are.

null, to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

Nope, you’re pretty clearly lying to save face.

null, (edited ) to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

No I’m not. Your explanations do not align with what you quoted and stated in your initial replies. They’re poor attempts at retroactively making it seem like you were implying something you obviously weren’t.

null, (edited ) to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

No, that wasn’t the intention of your original reply. Makes no sense in the context of your original response. Just goalposts you’ve moved after the fact.

null, to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

It’s not false if the event changes the environment around it, which was my point.

No it wasn’t. That’s neither implied nor explicitly stated in your initial reply.

null, to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

And to recap, what you said is:

If an event lasts only a moment and leaves no visual cue, you will see that event happen using a binary search.

Which is, of course, false.

null, (edited ) to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

Nah, they’re just gonna say you can use AI or something, as a retroactive explanation for what they obviously weren’t talking about in their original comment. They’re a troll; they’re not going to budge.

Edit: Case in point. They’re now at the level of mental gymnastics that they’re saying part of their original response implied that they were talking about the capabilities of AI at some point in the future.

null, to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

Better luck next time!

null, to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

Yes to what?

null, (edited ) to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

If the event lasts only a moment and leaves no visual cue (e.g. an assault).

How?

null, to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

That doesn’t apply to the comment you replied to.

null, (edited ) to programmer_humor in Programmer tries to explain binary search to the police

But you will see the event happen though.

Not with a binary search.

Edit: just collapse this thread and move on. Cosmic Cleric is an obvious troll.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #