oce

@oce@jlai.lu

I try to contribute to things getting better, sometimes through polite rational skepticism.
Disagreeing with your comment ≠ supporting the opposite side, I support rationality.
Let’s discuss to refine the arguments that make things better sustainably.
Always happy to question our beliefs.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

oce,

I’d replace scientist to something more precise like physicist because usually people consider mathematicians as scientists even if it depends on definitions.

oce,

It’s a classic French speaker mistake because physicist is “physicien” and physician is “médecin”, very different.

oce,

Thank you, I feel free now. Go get those other hostages now!

oce,

Historians are scientists imo. Is that a reference I don’t have?

oce,

Yes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.

oce,

Same for me, failed to get a PhD scholarship, was not going to look for another one, switched to IT, have good life.

oce,

The git based AI he was secretly programming will take over and anyone who can’t use git submodules without looking up the commands will die.

oce,

Same happened to me with my own record of a 19th century guitar piece. They lifted it after my appeal but it’s so annoying to be presumed guilty.

oce,

He does neutrosynthesis kinda like plants do photosynthesis but different.

oce,

If you walk with the sun in your back, it is unwarranted.

oce,

My favorite part of Arch is that my install from 5 years ago still works perfectly and I didn’t have to do any major version upgrade that breaks everything.

oce,

That’s so accurate.

oce,

I’m afraid I only eat alive food it’s important for my internal vibration and helps me meditate more intensively to find my true self.

oce,

You just have to eat enough for it to slide back in easily again.

oce,

To let the bunny out of the box.

oce,

I don’t think he’s saying it’s not a big deal for us, but for the planet.

oce,

I even think humanity will survive fine as many icy places will become habitable and we’re good at adapting to extreme climates. Overall it’s rather our current civilisations with the bad but also the good in them that are the most endangered.

oce,

I also don’t think the person is unemotional, it’s more about having the correct idea of what’s actually going to happen if we don’t do anything. I also think ecology needs more rationality, otherwise we get people closing nuclear plants to restart coal plants.

oce,

I guess people didn’t understand my point. If we don’t curb our carbon emissions, we’re certainly going to have a climate that we never lived and it will kill a lot of people. But it’s not unlimited, at some point we will not be able emit more carbon, because there’s no more or we lost the ability to do so. So while fewer than today, there will probably still be habitable places like Nothern Canada and Russia. I think humanity would be able to survive there, although much smaller and the centuries of disasters would have destroyed our civilisations as we know them.

People probably thought I’m denying the urgency to do an ecological transition, but I’m not. I’m trying to comment on what would actually happen, similarly to previous comment saying that the planet itself is not going to die.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #