shapesandstuff

@shapesandstuff@feddit.de

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

shapesandstuff,

I haven’t done that, but when looking something up from a long text on paper, I get the same feeling I do when I hit ctrl+f. Like theres no keyboard obviously, but i feel ctrl+f

shapesandstuff,

Please don’t tell me you’re gonna bring up the stupid soy fields in the rain forest argument :'D

shapesandstuff, (edited )

Yes, some topical AB are available according to a quick online search

Some topical antibiotics can be purchased as over-the-counter (OTC) medicines.
However, it is always recommended that you consult a medical expert before purchasing and using any medication.
Topical antibiotics are used to treat skin wounds, scrapes, scratches, and minor burns.
They are available in ointment, cream, spray, or powder forms and are used to prevent infection in topical skin ailments.
Some over-the-counter topical antibiotics include: Bacitracin (Neosporin)
Polymyxin (Polysporin)
Neomycin (Neosporin Plus Pain Relief)
Pramoxine
Benzoyl peroxide (Proactiv)

shapesandstuff,

yep due to the meat industry keeping going regardless of a fairly small demographic quitting their products

shapesandstuff,

also what part of my comment prompted you to post that random response?

shapesandstuff,

exactly, because almost 100% of that soy is for meat production

shapesandstuff,

Thats why i didnt write what you claim i did.

“they have over the counter antiobiotics”

As in antibiotics exist there that are OTC.

Is that so absurd?

shapesandstuff,

Besides the topicals OTC that i outlined in here, US friends of mine “keep” their remaining prescription ABs for when they are sick again.

Like he got prescribed some for a COLD and then kept them to pop when he gets the next COLD :'D

Its nuts. Some OTC, others simply overprescribed.

Here you get a prescription if you have a severe infection, OR a substantial injury with high risk.

shapesandstuff,

It does, if enough people did it.

You’re so angry lol

shapesandstuff,

I mean if they make substantially less money with product x they scale back production. Just like with any other product.

Really not that complicated. Obviously they’re not tracking my personal consumption, nobody believes that.

shapesandstuff,

Are u saying if over night the entire customer base of meat as a whole stopped buying it would have zero effect? Certainly thats not whay youre saying right?

shapesandstuff,

Wheree do you get your numbers from?

statista.com/…/soy-production-end-uses-worldwide/

They seem off my guy.

Weird to not provide real numbers for someone calling me a liar

shapesandstuff,

Cuz youre lying about a very emotionally charged topic and calling me a liar. If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data.

shapesandstuff,

Are u moving goal posts to feel like you’re winning something or genuinely expect the comment section in an online forum to solve societal issues?

Less meat produced = better.

How much more better things could be a different wat is irrelevant; using that as an excuse to never do anything is actually damaging.

shapesandstuff,

Check again bro feddit.de/comment/4912410

shapesandstuff, (edited )

everything i’ve said is true

It aint. Literally. U pulled 85% out of your ass. Try 4% (industrial use) 77% livestock feed.

shapesandstuff,

Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser.

Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn’t mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I’m having trouble finding your quote.

Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water.

shapesandstuff,

Yeah, what does that have to do with veganism? Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew?

shapesandstuff,

Exactly. Thats the problem.

Global consumption and production are increasing

Do. You. Follow?

shapesandstuff,

You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it.

Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you’re so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term.

Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down.

Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore.

Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive.

shapesandstuff,

Funny how that works isn’t it

shapesandstuff,

I wholeheartedly agree.

shapesandstuff,

You still talking about the comment that I didn’t write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool.

shapesandstuff,

You’re hilarious. Nice try.

shapesandstuff,

This has been known and warned for probably decades now.

But still we continue to “preemptively” use it in vast quantities in the meat, milk and egg industry instead of using sustainable or even humane conditions for the animals in question.

Guess who gets to eat antibiotics evey day, increasing likelihood of multi resistant germs?

Meat eaters. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565197/

Nothing will be done about it until its too late. As is tradition. Profits are more important than world wide disaster. Again.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #