The smd codes kind of suck. They’re used on devices where there isn’t room for the full PN. But they’re not standardized well. Are often unique per footprint, but even then, not a guarantee.
I looked up “CAZ” here: smd.yooneed.one/code4341.html and found a part that matches the footprint. Then googled around and found the LN61CC3002MR-G on lcsc.
It can be very hard to find a part on Google, or say Digikey, if it’s made by a Chinese company. LCSC can be helpful since they’re based in China.
I think that it is the same stuff, just will propellant added in the aerosol. A small squeezy bottle with a needle is better if you have live stuff nearby - but you can always fill one from an aerosol
In my opinion an oscillator always produces an AC sine wave. There is usually no need for a DC overlapped oscillator signal. The DC supply of an oscillator produces a AC sine wave relative to GND.
Where exactly did you measure a DC sine wave, relative to what, and what do you mean by “AC removes a DC component”?
True AC is sort of “balanced” in that it has just as much positive as negative. The positive area of the waveform is the same size as the negative area. For waveforms that are sort of symmetric across the 0V with a time offset, such as a sine or square wave, this means that it is centered along the 0V line. A DC source, on the other hand, never changes voltage.
The 0V to +10V source you have is actually a -5V to +5V square AC plus a +5V DC. The capacitor is getting rid of the DC component leaving just the AC, which happens to be the -5V to +5V AC that you are getting.
That’s why they call it a decoupling capacitor, cuz you usually just need AC (signal) at the out of a circuit, you don’t need the DC part of the signal.
pressfit connections usually are very reliable. if there is a poor connection i would presume that the barrel of the via is broken and a new pressfit connector will not help. maybe putting solder in would help. did you already test for poor connections?
Barrel of the via? I’m unfamiliar with that terminology – what is that? I did a continuity check from the very bottom to the very top and everything tested good. When the audio is out, twisting the header a bit would usually bring it back so I assume(d) it was just a poor connection somewhere despite the continuity check.
EDIT: Okay, some quick Googling got me understanding this better. As I mentioned, continuity is good, but I still suspect it’s something in this area. I suppose I could remove the connectors and install solder connectors, instead of press fit?
yes i think so, but u would have to make sure the solder will rise through the through-hole as mich as possible. maybe u can try to find the faulty pin with wiggling them separately
The standard way of looking at this is to consider a capacitor-resistor series combination going to ground. Connect a 10v (wrt ground) supply to the capacitor and the voltage across the resistor rises to +10v, then decays. Now connect that capacitor to ground and that same resistor gets -10v across it, which then decays. Whatever is connected to the capacitor “top” terminal has to be able to sink current as well as source it.
That’s what generators in simulators do - they have zero internal impedance (usually). They sink currents as well as source them.
The oscillator is creating both DC and AC. The DC component is the average value of the signal. In the case of your 0-10v square wave, that is 5v. The AC compnent is the part of the signal that changes. The effect of the capacitor is to block the DC component, leaving only the AC component. The waveform is shifted vertically to be centered around 0v.
I recommend EEVBlog’s OpAmp tutorial. His explanation is pretty simple to understand. Basically there are two rules (note these rules are ideal, but the exceptions can usually be ignored):
No current flows into the inverting and non-inverting inputs.
For negative and positive feedback circuits, the OpAmp wants to keep the inputs the same by changing its output, and will sink power to its positive or negative power rails to achieve this.
discuss.tchncs.de
Oldest