mander.xyz

charonn0, to science_memes in how is pragent formed?
@charonn0@startrek.website avatar

How is babby formed?

ken_cleanairsystems,
@ken_cleanairsystems@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

They need to do way instain mother who kill their babby

Damaskox, to science_memes in how is pragent formed?
@Damaskox@kbin.social avatar

A YouTube video about this thing (I believe)

edinbruh, to science_memes in gatekeeping

U

driving_crooner,
@driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br avatar

Ω

Collatz_problem,

UΩU

driving_crooner,
@driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br avatar

UωU

ivanafterall, to science_memes in gatekeeping
@ivanafterall@kbin.social avatar

Nope, you fell for the classic sibling blunder:

What about INFINITY PLUS ONE!?

Yondoza, (edited )

It’s Infinity! Infinity -1? also infinity! Well what about infinity times infinity? Believe it or not, infinity! ♾️

rockerface,

Infinity gangsta when aleph null walks in

lemmington_steele,

assuming the interval includes all of the real numbers, then it is definitely larger than aleph null (the size of all countable infinities)

ApexHunter,

What about infinity times zero?

rockerface,

For that one we’re going to call my good friend L’Hôpital. That guy rules!

fallingcats, (edited )
Kase,

Oh yeah? What’s infinity divided by zero?

callyral, to science_memes in gatekeeping
@callyral@pawb.social avatar
Abracadaniel, (edited ) to science_memes in OCB
@Abracadaniel@hexbear.net avatar

I believe the hexagonal tiling maximizes area while minimizing perimeter, right?

ryathal,

It’s just what happens when wax deforms from pressure. You can do the same thing with plastic straws, if you pack them tightly, or compress them with your hands.

Abraxiel,

A circle should have the greatest area per perimeter and I can’t think of a regular polygon with more sides that tessellates.

shiveyarbles, to science_memes in how is pragent formed?

Ummm you’re just fat

Bizarroland, to science_memes in gatekeeping
@Bizarroland@kbin.social avatar

You also have to remember to put the +C at the end

LordGimp, to science_memes in poggers

… am I the only one who learned 1+100, 2+99… to make 101 times 50 pairs? Lmao feels like it’s much easier. 101 × 50 = 5050

nova_ad_vitum,

Sorry if this is stupid but how to deal with sums to odd numbers ? Won’t you have a number left over after pairing all the others?

0x0,

Nope, because what you’re doing is copying the entire sequence, reversing it, and pairing up each element left to right. There’s no way to have any leftovers because the original sequence and the new reversed sequence have the same number of elements.

A perhaps less intuitive way of thinking of it is you start with a sequence of 1 up to N, which contains exactly N elements. The sequence from 1 to N and its reverse together contain 2N elements, which is by definition an even number, regardless of whether N is even or odd. Because it’s even we can break it into pairs without leftovers.

LordGimp,

Add the last number onto the end. So the sum of all numbers between 1 and 101 is 50 pairs of 101 plus one extra 101 and the end. It’d end up being 5050 + 101 or 51x101 or 5151

stolid_agnostic,

This is my first time seeing this problem. Interesting that they taught it in school.

LordGimp,

Had a statistics and probability class in hs instead of the standard precalc. I feel it’s more applicable for students now than precalc anyways. It felt pretty cool to sit down in class and figure out the odds of winning on a lotto ticket and when the odds indicate you should buy a ticket.

stolid_agnostic, (edited )

Yeah pre-calc is pretty much remedial math nowadays. You don’t even get 100 level math until you’re at intermediate algebra!

Thinking of it in terms of statistics makes a lot of sense, I can see how this problem would help develop intuitions.

0ops,

The math is the same, you just wrote it more “casually”. For me it was 0+100, 1+99, 2+98 … 49+51 -> 100 x 50 = 5000, then add the 50 that was missed from the middle for 5050. But yeah I remember coming up with that when I was really young.

wrath_of_grunge, to science_memes in poggers
@wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social avatar

I never made it far enough in math to understand this.

Fal,
@Fal@yiffit.net avatar

Addition?

veganpizza69,
@veganpizza69@lemmy.world avatar

There’s a nice book about this: www.goodreads.com/…/57007645-thinking-better so you can learn.

I… haven’t read it yet, but it’s on my list. I’ve only listened to some interviews with the author about it.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ce88f835-e2d3-4d79-ac81-74b930b558b7.png

Mothra, to science_memes in OCB
@Mothra@mander.xyz avatar

Obsessive Compulsive Beesorder?

fossilesque,
@fossilesque@mander.xyz avatar

Yes, this is how I relate to bees.

768, to science_memes in gatekeeping

I cast set theory?

Adalast,

I was thinking the same thing.

768,

Thanks.

CarbonIceDragon, to science_memes in gatekeeping
@CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social avatar

Last time I saw this kind of challenge it was on reddit and I just replied with ℝ, but people brought up that this leaves out complex numbers. I’ll now contend, however, that any number not included in that isn’t real.

vsh,
@vsh@lemm.ee avatar

I prefer $

FooBarrington,

Complex numbers? That sounds imaginary.

BigDanishGuy,

Just like birds, complex numbers aren’t real!

Screw you sqrt(-1), you aren’t even a real number, you poser!

fossilesque,
@fossilesque@mander.xyz avatar
zzx,

This image goes so hard

morrowind,
@morrowind@lemmy.ml avatar

You could use ℂ

eestileib,

Quaternions hello?

Toldry,
@Toldry@lemmy.world avatar

That leaves out quaternions

hernanca,

What about quaternions and octonions and …

yetAnotherUser,

{x | x is a number}

gravitas_deficiency, to science_memes in OCB

Hexagons are the bestagons

mvilain, to science_memes in poggers
@mvilain@kbin.social avatar

I thought it was Euler that did this. But I can imagine Gauss doing it too.

mexicancartel,

Ahh because Euler did everything

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #