techcrunch.com

Plume, to news in Brave lays off 9% of its workforce | TechCrunch

Brave? You mean the privacy focused web browser which marketing’s is so awful I can’t get myself to trust it, due to how much of it looks like a malware crypto scam, who was made by an asshole who was outed from Mozilla for being a homophobic asshole? Yeah. Fuck Brave.

iamhazel, to news in Spotify spotted prepping a $19.99/mo 'Superpremium' service with lossless audio, AI playlists and more | TechCrunch
@iamhazel@beehaw.org avatar

Couple weeks ago I did a cleanse and found my subscriptions had ballooned to nearly $150/mo. They should not be able to charge on auto pay when they switch the terms and raise the prices.

explodicle,

I hope it eventually switches from “give out the secret number to take your money” to “use the secret number to spend your money”. Then I can use a script, a third party service, or whatever to handle recurring payments.

agegamon,

My rule for a while has been to limit myself to one major subscription at a time. It really curtails the rampant streaming costs.

I made an exception for spotify for a while (so I’d have spotify + one streaming service + maybe one small low-cost one) but with how expensive they’ve all gotten I’ve reverted to only spotify and low-cost stuff.

Right now I just have spotify and dropout TV so I can catch up on Dimension 20.

iamhazel,
@iamhazel@beehaw.org avatar

After a purge I’m left with YNAB, Microsoft 365, GitHub Copilot, and a YouTube membership to City Planner Plays (s/o).

I’m particularly annoyed with MS365 because of how intertwined with Windows it has become, making it harder to get rid of the subscription… and it is kinda nice to reinstall Windows, login, and everything is just … there. Just as it was 20 minutes ago.

techwithjake,

100% agree with you. It’s why I use Privacy.com and set a limit to what it can charge. Stuff gets more expensive without me noticing, welp. I gotta decide if it’s worth it to keep paying.

(Sorry, sounds like a shill. It’s just saved me multiple times in the past.)

iamhazel,
@iamhazel@beehaw.org avatar

Huh neat! Can you still get points on your credit card for purchases do you know?

toothpicks, to news in You can now react to messages on Gmail | TechCrunch

Can we not

SugarApplePie, to news in Spotify spotted prepping a $19.99/mo 'Superpremium' service with lossless audio, AI playlists and more | TechCrunch
@SugarApplePie@beehaw.org avatar

Wow if there’s one thing I really want to pay extra for is to have a computer randomly pick my music based off what I like. That’s way better than what Spotify has already been doing: randomly picking music based off what I like! True innovation. Will the service also come with some sort of slider or bar that I can use to change how loud or quiet a song is? Maybe some other buttons that can let me skip or go back to a song, even pause and play it to my liking?

anachronist,

They don’t think these features are compelling. The purpose of this is to create a new pricing tier so that later they can make it the (not-actually) ad-free tier and make the current (not-actually) ad-free tier have (more) ads.

JokeDeity, to news in Spotify spotted prepping a $19.99/mo 'Superpremium' service with lossless audio, AI playlists and more | TechCrunch

I’ll steal that too greedy bitches.

DarkThoughts, to news in You can now react to messages on Gmail | TechCrunch

😱

CosmoNova, to news in Spotify spotted prepping a $19.99/mo 'Superpremium' service with lossless audio, AI playlists and more | TechCrunch

Sounds like absolute garbage.

GunnarRunnar,

Since Spotify can’t even make a shuffle that works, I don’t see how AI playlists would be any good either.

SLaSZT, to news in You can now react to messages on Gmail | TechCrunch
@SLaSZT@kbin.social avatar

I'm struggling to think of a use case for this. Why not just reply and put an emoji in there?

GunnarRunnar,

Are you talking generally about emoji reactions or just when it comes to email?

rgb3x3,

I would think just email. Who uses email for anything other than formal communication anymore where it would be inappropriate to use emoji reactions?

Reactions are fine for casual messaging, but email just isn’t that kind of social platform.

bermuda,

I assume it’s to cut down on wasted space from “thumbs up” and “Okay” emails.

SLaSZT,
@SLaSZT@kbin.social avatar

I thought it would be obvious because of the article headline, but email reactions. It's undeniable that emoji are useful for communication, I'm just not convinced that this particular interaction with an email is anything that anyone asked for or needs.

The only use case I can imagine would be for school/work accounts, but this feature isn't supported for those types of accounts yet. I'd assume that's because it's not yet integrated into the Office 365 platform.

The question remains: who outside of a corporate environment needs this? Maybe large families who communicate through chain emails? I honestly don't know anyone who uses email to have group chats anymore, but I suppose those people must exist. Just seems like it would be a small number.

anothermember,

I thought you just reply with the letter “J” that’s the convention, right?

serial_crusher, to news in Spotify spotted prepping a $19.99/mo 'Superpremium' service with lossless audio, AI playlists and more | TechCrunch
@serial_crusher@lemmy.basedcount.com avatar

Their AI DJ feature keeps touting music I might love from my high school days, then playing country music, for some reason. No, I don’t like country music. Also Spotify didn’t even exist until I was like 28 years old.

adespoton, to news in Brave lays off 9% of its workforce | TechCrunch

Brave had a workforce? I thought it was one guy’s pet chromium/blockchain project….

macallik,

The owner is the guy who created JavaScript and is funded by controversial right-winger Peter Thiel

belated_frog_pants,

Also donates money to anti-lgbtq groups

Bitrot,
@Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

$1,000 to a campaign in 2008. A majority of Californians voted that way, btw. Good chance many of those millions of voters (and campaign donators) make your tech.

He’s done other things like his covid noise, continuing to use that one 15 years later shouldn’t sway many.

falsem,

What is this wikiless site?

macallik,

It's a free, open source alternative Wikipedia front-end focused on privacy.

https://github.com/Nangjing/wikiless

Basically you search wikipedia w/o tracking.

_MusicJunkie,

No JavaScript or ads. (…) Prevents Wikipedia getting your IP address.

Wikipedia is light on JavaScript and has never had ads. You prevent Wikipedia from getting your IP address but instead reveal it to some random third party, combined with letting them know everything you look up.

What the hell is the point of this. All this does it confuse people and decrease privacy.

macallik, (edited )

This is going increasingly off topic.

  1. Yes wikipedia does have ads every time they fundraise
  2. I use libredirect to complete privacy-focused searches across various front-ends, from YouTube to Reddit to Wikipedia, and my searches are distributed across various instances, so no, a single random third party is not getting all of my searches.
  3. 'The point' is to share an article on the guy who owns Brave. I've provided additional context about wikiless as requested, but if you need more context moving forward, please do a google search.
alfonsojon,
@alfonsojon@beehaw.org avatar

They have ads to fundraise. Wikipedia is one of the greatest archives of knowledge in history. Their clients and website are open source powered by MediaWiki. Of all the sites to use a privacy friendly frontend for, I’d have Wikipedia at the very bottom.

The_Terrible_Humbaba,
@The_Terrible_Humbaba@beehaw.org avatar

He created JavaScript?!?!

I can excuse controversial right-wing views and homophobia, but I draw the line at creating JavaScript!

AlexWIWA, to news in Spotify spotted prepping a $19.99/mo 'Superpremium' service with lossless audio, AI playlists and more | TechCrunch

Finally, lossless audio.

Overzeetop,

Good news: you now have access to streaming lossless audio

Bad news: Nearly every device people use now connects through Bluetooth, which doesn’t support lossless audio.

AlexWIWA,

Thankfully I am a Luddite with wires hanging off of every limb

shiveyarbles, to news in Spotify spotted prepping a $19.99/mo 'Superpremium' service with lossless audio, AI playlists and more | TechCrunch

All the subscription services going up in price constantly. This bullshit is hard to abide.

BarrierWithAshes, to news in Spotify spotted prepping a $19.99/mo 'Superpremium' service with lossless audio, AI playlists and more | TechCrunch
@BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social avatar

Pfft. If Spotify wants me to up the subscription they should give me the ability to directly download songs.

emptyother, to news in You can now react to messages on Gmail | TechCrunch

Eh… They chose to use the email protocol to send each emoji?! So external users or third-party clients (or school and work accounts for some reason) will be spammed. Won’t a bunch of gmails get marked as spammers then?

skullgiver,
@skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl avatar

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Chobbes,

    Which RFCs are you referring to?

    skullgiver,
    @skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl avatar

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Chobbes,

    Thanks :). I’ve actually been looking for the RSVP stuff and I wasn’t sure which RFC to look through (wasn’t sure if it was in the CalDAV one or the iCalendar one… and they’re weirdly huge). I appreciate you pointing me in the right direction!

    Also was curious how they were implementing reactions in e-mail. I actually think it’s a good feature, and it’s one that’s slowly been making it into XMPP and stuff. Emoji reactions and stuff sound kind of dumb and like a “whatever, who cares?” feature, but I find that on platforms like slack they’re actually a really good way to deal with quickly confirming something / finalizing decisions / quickly gauging the opinion of a group. I think a huge problem with e-mail and instant messaging is that they can be quite noisy, so having a “quiet” way to respond without having a thread explode is actually pretty welcome in my opinion.

    Semi-Hemi-Demigod, to news in Spotify spotted prepping a $19.99/mo 'Superpremium' service with lossless audio, AI playlists and more | TechCrunch
    @Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social avatar

    Hasn’t Pandora had “AI playlists” for like 15 years?

    Bitrot,
    @Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

    So has Spotify, and off and on the enable or disable easy access. In the past it was Spotify stations (standalone app), for a while you could create recommendation playlists based on artists, genres, or decades. Now they do it for you by making playlists like those themselves, “mix” playlists, “day list”, suggestions in shuffle, never ending playlists, and a bunch of other similar things that attempt to select things they think you’ll like.

    Every Noise at Once shows some of the linkages using a ton of their dynamically generated genre playlists: everynoise.com

    Overzeetop,

    Pandora’s entire reason for being was essentially a ML (/AI) exercise to fingerprint and associate music. It’s still pretty brilliant, really.

    Semi-Hemi-Demigod,
    @Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social avatar

    I've been a paying subscriber since 2007 and it's given me so much new music I'd never have heard of without it.

    Oddly enough, regardless of the station, it'll play me some Johnny Cash. Metal station? Johnny Cash. Punk station? Johnny Cash. Funk station? Believe it or not, Johnny Cash. I have the best Pandora in the world thanks to Johnny Cash.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #