theguardian.com

Plume, to news in French parliament backs proposal to ban vapes

Ban vapes, but won’t ban cigarettes…

danieljoeblack,

Don’t ban them, that’ll just start up a black market for them which way less safe and also makes sure the government doesn’t get any portion of the sales to fund healthcare.

I say slowly ramp up the tax on them, incentiving smokers to quit. The higher price would also help prevent future smokers from picking up the habit since they’ll be so expensive, for pretty much no gain.

Plume,

I say slowly ramp up the tax on them, incentiving smokers to quit.

That’s what they’ve been doing for years. It doesn’t really seem to work and is effectively just a tax on the poors.

Aussiemandeus,
@Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone avatar

Vapes harm people and cigarette companies spent a lot of money to hide the fact that so do their products

marco,
@marco@beehaw.org avatar

I’m still pretty convinced that vaping is less harmful than smoking, but it’s also easier …

ShellMonkey,
@ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com avatar

Hoho, buy how vuld we maintain ze image of ze snooty fenchman with ah rideeculously long cigarette holder zhen?

tux0r, to news in French parliament backs proposal to ban vapes
@tux0r@feddit.de avatar

Good. Vapers look like clowns with a flute.

Lophostemon,

A flute carved from a stick of fuckwit.

BlinkerFluid,
@BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one avatar

If they smoked, they’d be dead.

I wouldn’t have to look at them anymore.

cwagner,

As someone with box mods: Huh, you know weird flutes.

tux0r,
@tux0r@feddit.de avatar
ConstableJelly, to news in Fears raised after Hong Kong journalist fails to return from China trip

Worked at the paper for 18 years, good. But it’s owned by Alibaba Holdings in China, bad. The paper claims they’re in the contact with family and have confirmed she’s safe and taking time for personal issues, good. But her friends, colleagues, and Hong Kong Journalists Association remain concerned for her safety, bad.

I don’t know anything about all the elements at play here but it certainly sounds suspicious.

jmcs,

Why are they in contact with the family and not with the reporter directly? It’s not like we are 1823 and communication has to be sent on precious missives traversing dangerous seas.

ConstableJelly,

Theoretically, should an emergency occur, I may contact one close acquaintance, like a family member, and ask that they notify anyone else who needs to know, like work, so that I don’t have to provide updates through multiple channels all the time. Or I don’t feel like answering questions about something private to someone, like my boss, who has no business with the details.

That part doesn’t strike me as suspicious, but the persisting concern from friends and colleagues (as well as the potential unreliability of the paper’s representatives) does.

jarfil, (edited )

It says she previously worked at the Apple Daily… wasn’t that an “”“extremist”“” paper linked to the detention of that one lady for screaming at an apple in public?

theguardian.com/…/hong-kong-grandma-wong-arrested…

CaptnNMorgan, to movies in ‘I was told not to make eye contact with Tom Cruise’: meet the world’s most prolific film extra

Nobody here has mentioned that “no eye contact” is really common in Hollywood. To the point that various celebrities including Conan O’Brien had that rule for their staff but was totally unaware and as soon as they found out, they put a stop to it immediately.

I’m not saying Tom Cruise didn’t know but it’s definitely a possibility.

agamemnonymous, (edited )
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

I wouldn’t be surprised, especially for A-listers, especially on-set. Eye-contact promotes conversations which, even when they are more stimulating than “Oh wow! You’re _____!! I loved you in that thing”, eat up time in a very busy production schedule. It’s even worse if the star is genuinely nice and personable, and sincerely appreciates their fans. It adds up to hours gone every day in 3-6 minute increments.

livus,
@livus@kbin.social avatar

@CaptnNMorgan that's an interesting point.

As far as I can tell she never worked in Hollywood - she lives in the UK and the films mentioned in the article include a lot of British movies.

That might be why the Tom Cruise eye contact thing stood out to her as an example of ridiculous heirarchy.

I wonder if it was a Hollywood studio shooting on location, or some sort of co-pro.

CaptnNMorgan,

It still could be someone on his team telling people that and he is totally unaware. Idk why I’m trying to defend Tom Cruise I’m just not convinced this is what makes him a bad person

livus,
@livus@kbin.social avatar

@CaptnNMorgan yeah I'm happy to be agnostic on it. Ironically though, him acting unaware of his cult's behaviour probably is a big part of what makes him a bad person.

I just liked this article because I thought Jill Goldston's life sounds super interesting.

livus, to movies in ‘I was told not to make eye contact with Tom Cruise’: meet the world’s most prolific film extra
@livus@kbin.social avatar

Other stars who met with Jill’s approval included ex-Bond Timothy Dalton: “He didn’t get on with his co-star Joanne Whalley, so I had to do the love scenes with him. I used to pray, ‘Please, God, don’t let my hands sweat when he holds them!’” And Michael Caine: “He put his jacket over my head to stop me getting wet in the rain. A true gentleman.” She liked Warren Beatty too, though she says he somehow found the time to proposition her for a three-way with him and Jack Nicholson while producing, directing and also starring in the 1981 film Reds. “It might have ended more than friends. But not with Jack Nicholson as well! I said: ‘Sorry, no. I’m happily married!’”

Lophostemon, to movies in ‘I was told not to make eye contact with Tom Cruise’: meet the world’s most prolific film extra

The idea that anyone could have the gumption to have lackeys order people not to make eye contact, is breathtakingly shitty.

Even the Queen never ordered that sort of crap.

livus,
@livus@kbin.social avatar

@Lophostemon well no, as far as monarchs go she was fairly modern.

But it is kind of funny though. Like, what's so scary about eye contact.

danekrae, (edited )

If you’re as short as Tom, people are looking down at you.

Lophostemon,

They’d have to get down on their knees and probably tousle his hair, saying “hello little fella! How are you today? Have you had a nap today?”

Warwick Davis certainly towers over him, metaphorically anyway, if we’re talking about morals, ethics and humility.

cryostars, to movies in ‘I was told not to make eye contact with Tom Cruise’: meet the world’s most prolific film extra

Tom Cruise is a piece of shit

livus,
@livus@kbin.social avatar

@cryostars doesn't seem to have bothered her though:

“Extras are the lowest and you don’t ever speak to a star unless they speak to you. We’ve been told: ‘Tom Cruise is about to come on set. Please do not make eye contact.’” She has always found the strictly enforced on-set hierarchy more amusing than demeaning. “I had self-worth, because I was part of the film. Films would be very boring without extras. You’d get on the tube train, and there’d be no one else in it!”

SinningStromgald,

He’s still a piece of shit.

Smurfe,

Yes, he is. I worked on one of his films and he is everything you read about him. I witnessed him flip his shit but to be fair, that was when he and Katie Holmes were breaking up.

livus, (edited )
@livus@kbin.social avatar

Totally, not disputing that.

Massive contrast with Bowie in the same article, who came up to talk to her because he remembered her from being extras together before he got famous.

Moneo,

Aww that is such a sweet story

tesseract, to privacyguides in Australian privacy watchdog refuses to investigate employer that allegedly accessed worker’s personal emails

These companies dig up everything from a prospective employee’s past, starting from childhood. Things that you said come back to bite you, even if you got wiser and changed your stance. But companies get to pull shit like this without consequences.

There should be a public blacklist database with every company and their dirty infractions like these. That way, at least very competent and desirable candidates can avoid them and look for better jobs.

JamesWords, to privacyguides in Australian privacy watchdog refuses to investigate employer that allegedly accessed worker’s personal emails

Bad but not surprising. Unlike many other privacy laws, Australia’s has an exception for employer access www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/…/employment#

b0rlax, to privacyguides in Australian privacy watchdog refuses to investigate employer that allegedly accessed worker’s personal emails

Easy solution, stop using company property for personal things.

Cheradenine, to privacyguides in Australian privacy watchdog refuses to investigate employer that allegedly accessed worker’s personal emails

Madzikanda had used his work laptop for personal activity, including saving his passwords for online banking, emailing from his personal account and accessing his online cloud storage.

Work device, work stuff

Personal device, personal stuff

Deceptichum, (edited ) to privacyguides in Australian privacy watchdog refuses to investigate employer that allegedly accessed worker’s personal emails
@Deceptichum@kbin.social avatar

Fucking pathetic.

I suppose when I enter company property they also have the right to do an anal cavity search on me because I am on company property after all.

furrowsofar,

Keep in mind that he was using a company device. Just do not do that. Similarly never use personal device for work. Similarly do not leave email on the server. This has always been the thing at least in the US.

casmael, to upliftingnews in Zimbabwean ranger brings unloved painted dogs back from brink

That was a pleasant read thanks

HeartyBeast, to upliftingnews in Zimbabwean ranger brings unloved painted dogs back from brink
@HeartyBeast@kbin.social avatar

They have a small pack of these in London zoo - always were a favourite of mine.

uriel238, to fuck_cars in Britain's addiction to cars is built on a financial house of cards
@uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

One might hypothesize car culture is a symptom of a society controlled by financial elites doing shenanigans to stay in power

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #