HipPriest,

I tried both, lurked a while and Kbin just seemed a bit more user friendly for me. Nothing deeper for me, just a matter of taste really.

NotAPenguin,
livus,
@livus@kbin.social avatar

Why I joined

  • had a more intuitive interface
  • had a better aesthetic
  • had a much cooler name
  • the dev seemed like a cool guy
  • before federation it felt exciting like being on the ground floor of something

Why I stayed

  • has heaps of cool features and functions that are easy to use
  • I like the Mastodon interface too
  • turns out the dev definitely is awesome and everything is very open
  • it has a really chill community
  • I still just like it more than the various Lemmys
mrbubblesort,
@mrbubblesort@kbin.social avatar

Kbin's UI is just better. I realize both can be customized, but I'd prefer not to mess around with any of that yet. Plus I know people on mastadon, so that sealed it for me.

freeman,

Customizations brought vulns on Lemmy with the custom emojis introducing XSS vulns and a few takeovers in the recent weeks.

Swedneck,
@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

but that’s not the fault of the UI, that’s the fault of the server and/or operator for allowing something like that to be even theoretically possible in the first place.

This is why you place UIs on separate domains from the servers, and always treat user input like it’s radioactive AND toxic.

freeman,

The custom emoji’s was a developed feature of Lemmy pushed out in their UI code. Even the project mainters instance was affected. Its why 0.18.2 was released.

join-lemmy.org/…/2023-07-11_-_Lemmy_Release_v0.18…

Thats not on server/infra operators. It was a vuln in the core UI code. Some operators DID patch it themselves (i think Beehaw is one), others were less affected (ie: My instance is closed and i dont use custom emjis anyhow), but those are features introduced by the maintainers and some of the bigger instances would get requests for them anyhow. So it was a problem.

Swedneck,
@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

but the fundamental vulnerability is not in the UI, by that logic you could just run your own UI and get into servers without issue, the vulnerability is always in either the server software or in the specific deployment.

snowe,
@snowe@programming.dev avatar

The vulnerability was in the ui.

Swedneck,
@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

again, that makes no sense whatsoever, by that logic anyone can just merrily wreak havoc by using a client specially made to have vulnerabilities.

rayman30,
@rayman30@lemmy.world avatar

Subjective. I don’t like the UI on Kbin more than the Lemmy one.

A_Chilean_Cyborg,
@A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl avatar

Kbin has a way better UI, but it needs better servers and having apps for Lemmy like liftoff makes me wait to get something similar before switching back to kbin.

DharkStare,

I have a kbin account which I switch to everytime lemmy.world goes down and the only real advantages I see are the better UI and the integrated microblog thing. It’s basically Lemmy and Mastodon wrapped up in a single piece of software.

legion,
@legion@kbin.social avatar

The UI! It's so much better than the other Lemmy instances. Also I can curse without getting banned lmao

CthuluVoIP,

Uhhhhh. Not sure which fucking Lemmy instance banned you, but sounds like a real bum out.

Ultra980,

It’s like lemmy + mastodon - you can microbilor and boost posts and comments. But after using it for a while, I switched back to lemmy because:

  • it has no API AFAICT the API is read-only, so there aren’t any apps (the dev is making one but I don’t think it’s finished and can’t compile it)
  • it has some performance issues
  • it doesn’t work sometimes
  • the UI looks worse
  • there are way less instances of it
  • it’s written in php instead of rust
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • asklemmy@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #