historyporn

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Pratai, in Pro-segregation rally in Arkansas, USA, 1960s

Colorize that and it could pass as a trump rally from just yesterday.

fsxylo, in Pro-segregation rally in Arkansas, USA, 1960s

Man, communism really never meant anything other than “shit we don’t like” in America.

PugJesus,
@PugJesus@kbin.social avatar

My favorite modern example is 'Marxist corporations'

BustinJiber, in Pro-segregation rally in Arkansas, USA, 1960s

Did they had a lot of blacks in communist USSR in the 60s?

FireTower,
@FireTower@lemmy.world avatar

I don’t know about blacks but they had a lot of reds. /s

1050053, in Pro-segregation rally in Arkansas, USA, 1960s

Guy in the white shirt looks like a very confused Colin Farrell from the future.

postmateDumbass,

Flag peen guy on the far right…

carnimoss, (edited ) in Pro-segregation rally in Arkansas, USA, 1960s

I might get flack for this but I don’t get the segregation thing because race is more trivial than AGAB. Usually people use AGAB to talk about health concerns. It seems race is a thing because we make it a problem.

OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe,

I mean, race is a thing when it comes to likelihood of certain diseases and handfuls of medications affect some groups differently than others. There are legitimate differences in trends of bone structure/length/shaping. Like, even if you’re not outwardly presenting as being black, like if your family is Hispanic mixed but mostly Hispanic, sickle cell anemia is highly prevalent in the black community and you SHOULD know things like that if only for the doctor to better understand the results and tests

Race, or at least what regions your genetic makeup best adheres to, can be important for dietary changes, as there have been some (I haven’t looked at this in a decade) minor research in regard to whether eating foods similar to genetic ancestors might help that was inconclusive (I think. Mostly, if I remember, they just found some data to suggest people who have medditeranean ancestry benefit from adding fish to their diet, but so does everyone else for the most part).

Skin color matters for things like external medication absorption, varying levels of need for sunlight and vitamin d production. But other than that and the fringe elements above, yeah it’s mostly just a thing because we make it a thing, but we’ve made it a thing for so long it’s seemingly one of our ‘stickiest’ holdovers.

Sanctus, in Pro-segregation rally in Arkansas, USA, 1960s
@Sanctus@lemmy.world avatar

Reminder that our dark past is still ongoing.

alignedchaos, (edited ) in "My turn next!" Testing bulletproof vests, 1923

What a creative way to write “demoing”

charonn0, in Pro-segregation rally in Arkansas, USA, 1960s
@charonn0@startrek.website avatar

It just goes to show how empty and dishonest racist rhetoric really is.

zzzz,

And anti-communist rhetoric, for that matter.

AngryCommieKender,
Gloria, (edited ) in Pro-segregation rally in Arkansas, USA, 1960s

OCTOBER 3, 2018 The Cruelty Is the Point

But it’s not the burned, mutilated bodies that stick with me. It’s the faces of the white men in the crowd. There’s the photo of the lynching of Thomas Shipp and Abram Smith in Indiana in 1930, in which a white man can be seen grinning at the camera as he tenderly holds the hand of his wife or girlfriend. There’s the undated photo from Duluth, Minnesota, in which grinning white men stand next to the mutilated, half-naked bodies of two men lashed to a post in the street—one of the white men is straining to get into the picture, his smile cutting from ear to ear. There’s the photo of a crowd of white men huddled behind the smoldering corpse of a man burned to death; one of them is wearing a smart suit, a fedora hat, and a bright smile.

Their names have mostly been lost to time. But these grinning men were someone’s brother, son, husband, father. They were human beings, people who took immense pleasure in the utter cruelty of torturing others to death—and were so proud of doing so that they posed for photographs with their handiwork, jostling to ensure they caught the eye of the lens, so that the world would know they’d been there. Their cruelty made them feel good, it made them feel proud, it made them feel happy. And it made them feel closer to one another.

www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/…/572104/

superbirra,

paywalled :/

IndiBrony, in French Soldiers in Tunnel, WW1 (1910s)
@IndiBrony@lemmy.world avatar

Merde, Pierre! You didn’t have to use the flash!

Mr_Blott, in Pro-segregation rally in Arkansas, USA, 1960s

Crazy to think that over 20 years before that, US army generals had to brief their troops that were stationed in the UK to be ready to meet black troops in the pubs

ThatWeirdGuy1001, in Pro-segregation rally in Arkansas, USA, 1960s
@ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world avatar

I regularly think about how many of our sweet old grandparents were among these crowds.

How many of our doting loving grandmother’s were hurling racial slurs at the top of their lungs?

How many grandfather’s strung up the rope for the lynch mob?

These things ended less than a full generation ago

ricecake,

Most of them were probably just quiet racist beliefs at home and in implicit ways in public.

It’s easier to miss, but it’s also easier to retreat from, since it’s not such a public belief.

Just like most people weren’t civil rights activists, most also weren’t frothing rally style racists.

antidote101, in Pro-segregation rally in Arkansas, USA, 1960s

Mental note, make meme, top panel, this picture and text “Race mixing is communism”

Bottom panel, Trump in a tux with the text “Race mixing is Cultural Marxism”.

Manmikey, (edited ) in American-made M3 tank used by the British in the Burma Campaign, WW2, 1945
@Manmikey@lemmy.world avatar

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3_Lee

The design was unusual because the main weapon – a larger caliber, medium-velocity 75 mm gun – was in an offset sponson mounted in the hull with limited traverse. The sponson mount was necessary because, at the time, American tank plants did not have the design experience necessary to make a gun turret capable of holding a 75 mm weapon.

setsneedtofeed, (edited )
@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world avatar

Good context. All true, the M3 was indeed kludged together in a very short time after America didn’t invest a lot into interwar tank design.

In addition, the configuration of putting the main gun in the hull was not unprecedented. The French Char B1 did the same thing, and it was considered a very capable tank, even by the Germans up against in in 1940.

If you put yourself in the mindset of a 1930s designer trying to figure out the role of a tank and assuming a kind of breakthrough role, it does make sense to put the lighter weapon meant to target more mobile targets on a traversing turret and the heavier weapon for targeting heavy defensive positions in the hull rather than trying to figure out how to fit such a large gun into a turret.

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/03f5384c-7d17-4316-82e6-96040f6e4569.jpeg

someguy3, in Pro-segregation rally in Arkansas, USA, 1960s

The guy on the right always gets me how he holds the flag. (I think this photo is cropped, I think there’s a larger one.)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • historyporn@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #